English mindfuck
Adams v Lindsell
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Stilk v Myrick
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Merritt v Merritt
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Tweddle V Atkinson
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Butler Machine Tool Co v Ex - Cello - O Corp
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Currie V Misa
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre v Selfridge & Co. Ltd
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Ramsgate Hotel V Montefiore
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Re McArdle/ Thomas V Roscorla
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Thomas v Thomas
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Byrne V Tienhoven
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Routledge v Grant
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Felthouse V Bindley
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Collins v Godefroy
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Lampleigh V Braith waite
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Partridge v Crittenden
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Pha rmaceutical Society v Boots
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Lucy v Zehmer
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Hyde v Wrench
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
Balfour v Balfour
when spouses have separated, the presumption is that they intend to be bound by their agreements
Acceptance must be communicated clearly and cannot be imposed due to the silence of one of the parties
Consideration cannot be past ie you need “ fresh ” consideration for a contract to be valid
The “ last shot rule ” in the Battle of the Forms
promiss ory estoppel , if a promise is intended to be binding, intended to be acted upon, and was acted on, it is binding under the agreed upon and enforceable terms
Adequacy of consideration. IE consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate (ie bad bargains are valid bargains)
An exception to the rule governing consideration ie when there is a request to perform a service, past consideration or executed consideration can form the basis of a binding contract
A display of goods in a shop is an invitation to treat, not an offer
Postal acceptance rule /mailbox rule
An offer can be withdrawn any time be fore acceptance
established th e notion of the unilateral contract + some advertisements are an offer to the world + intention to be bound on the part of the offeror + communication of acceptance waived + performance of the action is acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts
a valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss of responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other
An offer lapses after a “ reasonable period of time ”
performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Confirmed the doctrine of privity of contract
An advert is an invitation to treat, not an offer/advertisements for bilateral contracts are an invitation to treat
Domestic arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding
Third parties to a contract, even when they are a beneficiary of the contract , do not provide any consideration and therefore cannot have the contract enforced
Intention to contract is established by the objective, outward expression of a person and not in relation to their secret and unexpressed su bjective intent.
A counter offer negates the original offer, variation of the terms of an offer amounts to a counter offer+ the mirror image rule
a pre - existing contractual duty is not valid consideration
The withdrawal of the offer is not effective until it is communicated
{"name":"English mindfuck", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/Q03UIP1","txt":"Adams v Lindsell, Stilk v MyrickStilk v Myrick","img":"https://cdn.poll-maker.com/15-656705/0448690.jpg?sz=1200-00297004790950005300"}