LAW 1101
Assume that Congress passes a law establishing a new administrative agency to oversee cyberlaw issues. The agency writes rules to enable it to carry out its duties. The rules written by the agency will be known as a part of:
Administrative law
Statutory law
Constitutional law
Restatement of the law
The Illinois state legislature passes a law raising the speed limit on certain state roads. This law becomes part of a body of law known as:
Uniform law
Case law
Administrative law
Statutory law
The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) passes a new uniform act related to texting while driving. This uniform act:
Automatically becomes the law in every state.
Becomes the law in every state that has joined the NCCUSL.
Becomes a part of the United States Code and is therefore the law of the land in every state and territory of the United States.
Becomes the law in every state that adopts the uniform act through legislative action.
Richard is a state appeals court judge. In making judicial decisions, Richard issues rulings that are consistent with precedents established in similar cases within his jurisdiction. Richard is following the principle of:
Laches
Stare decisis
Courts of equity
Constitutional constructionism
All of the cases that have been decided by U.S. judges, as well as by English judges prior to the American Revolution, constitute a body of law known as:
The common law
The civil law
The law of equity
The statutory law
Sarah prevails in her lawsuit against Carl for injuries she sustained in a car accident. As a result, Sarah is entitled to a remedy. In the U.S. Legal system, Sarah's remedy will most likely be in the form of:
Specific performance
Recission
Injuction
Damages
Elaine is involved in a car accident where the other driver ran a red light. To determine whether she has a case, her attorney would apply which of the following classifications of law?
Procedural law
Substantive law
Administrative law
Cyber law
Most appellate court judges write opinions in which they give the reasons for their decisions. These opinions are collected and published in volumes of books known as:
Reporters
Case citations
Law journals
The United states code
Monroe is reviewing an appellate case for class and must correctly identify the parties to the case. The party appealing the case is known as the:
Appellee
Appellant
Respondent
Defendent
The city of Flagstaff passes legislation to make it illegal to carry an open container of alcohol on any city street at any time. This legislation is called:
A uniform law
A citation
An ordinance
An administrative rule
AT&T wants to obtain additional rights to operate within the 700 MHz spectrum in the U.S. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has rules and regulations that govern wireless spectrum auction. The FCC is:
An administrative agency
A executive agency
A legislative agency
A judicial agency
Toybox, Inc., manufactures the Spintop, a toy that the company discovers can cause harm. Before anyone is injured, Anne, a pediatric nurse who has not purchased a Spintop, files a suit against Toybox, Inc. In seeking to have the suit dismissed, Toybox, Inc.'s, best argument is that Anne does not have:
Certiorari.
Standing to use
Jurisdiction
Judicial review
Quentin is going to give testimony in a negligence case against Tilbury, Inc. Quentin will be questioned by an attorney in
A trial court
Appellate court
Supreme court
US court of appeals
Dexter loses his breach-of-contract case against Micheletta in a Georgia state trial court. Dexter appeals to the state court of appeals. Losing again, he files his next appeal with
US Supreme Court
US district court
Georgia Supreme Court
US court of appeals
Vinny decides to sue Allison. To begin the suit, Vinny must file a complaint. A complaint should contain
B. A statement indicating the key evidence behind the suit.
C. A motion for judgment n.o.v.
D. A motion for summary judgment.
A. A statement of the basis for the court's jurisdiction.
Motor Sports, Inc., sues A-Z Speed. Motor Sports alleges that A-Z breached (failed to perform) a contract that required A-Z to sell ten Jet Skis to Motor Sports. Under the rules governing discovery, Motor Sports is most likely entitled to obtain
Physical examinations of key employees of A-Z.
Permission for Motor Sports' president to personally inspect the contents of all of A-Z's paper records and computer files.
Documents in A-Z's possession relating to the contract.
Access to the contents of A-Z's top executives' safe-deposit boxes. Hide Feedback
In preparation for a trial between George and ABC Corporation, ABC's attorney places George under oath and asks George questions that are recorded by a court reporter. This is known as
A deposition
An interrogatory
Voir dire
Request for admissions
Jackson, a homeowner, files a lawsuit against Johnson, his construction contractor. Prior to trial, they meet with their attorneys to try to resolve their dispute before going to trial. This proceeding is known as
Negotiation
Arbitrability
Early neutral case evaluation
Summary jury trial
Britney files a lawsuit against Kevin and wants her case settled as quickly and with as little cost as possible. Her best option is
Arbitration
Mediation
Litigation
Appeal
Transpac Corp. and Alliance, Inc., agree to a contract that includes an arbitration clause. After a dispute arises, the case goes to arbitration. The arbitrator finds in Transpac's favor. Alliance files a lawsuit, alleging that the award should not be enforced because the arbitrator made an error in her findings of fact. The court will likely
Do nothing
Review the sufficiency of the award
Set aside the arbitrator's award
Review the merits of the dispute
Ethan is larger and stronger than Nate. Ethan threatens to beat Nate, punches Nate in the face, and knocks out Nate's tooth. Nate may bring a lawsuit against Ethan:
For assault only
For assault and battery
For battery only
Only if nate can prove ethan's motive
Wilhelm has an argument with his apartment roommate, Arthur. Wilhelm tells Arthur that if he leaves their apartment, Wilhelm will lock Arthur in his room when he returns. Arthur, frustrated with Wilhelm, leaves the apartment to take a walk. If Arthur were to sue Wilhelm for false imprisonment, Arthur would most likely:
Not be successful because Wilhelm is his roommate
Be successful because Arthur suffered emotional distress.
Be successful because Whelm committed false imprisonment
Not be successful because threats of future harm do not constitute false imprisonment.
Mel sent Jasper an e-mail message telling Jasper that his wife had been killed in a car accident, and Mel knew this was untrue. Jasper may be able to sue Mel for:
Libel
Battery
Infliction of emotional distress
Violations of the First Amendment
Stephanie stands in front of her home with a bullhorn shouting that her new neighbor, Kyle, has just been released from prison for child molestation. Stephanie knows this statement is false. Under what legal theory may Kyle recover damages from Stephanie?
Libel
Appropriation
Slander per se
Fraud
Ted is running down the sidewalk at a high rate a speed and bumps into Robin, knocking her down. She jumps back up and continues on. In a negligence action, all of the following elements would be met except:
Duty
Breach
Causation
Damages
While Jessica, Ashley, and Bryan are snowboarding, they ignore warning signs indicating that they have left the marked trail and are entering dangerous territory. They become lost, and a rescue effort begins. Climbing the mountain, a snowplow accidentally cuts a nearby town's main electrical cable. Due to the loss of her electric heat, Ethel, an elderly woman, dies of hypothermia. The boarders' negligence in ignoring the warning signs is:
Not the cause of Ethel's death.
The superseding cause of Ethel's death.
The proximate cause of Ethel's death.
The causation in fact, but not the proximate cause, of Ethel's death.
Jason is rushed to State General Hospital after a severe car accident. Brenda, a skilled emergency physician, rushes to Jason's aid. She immediately applies the latest knowledge in medical care and makes repeated attempts to alleviate Jason's injuries. After three hours of effort by Brenda and her staff, Jason dies from his injuries. Jason's estate sues Brenda for negligence. Jason's estate will most likely:
Not prove negligence because Brenda had no duty of care to Jason
Prove negligence because Brenda possessed superior knowledge as a physician.
Prove negligence because Jason died at the hospital.
Not prove negligence because Brenda exercised a standard level of professional knowledge and ability in treating Jason.
Baylee is driving her friend Sarah to the movies. Baylee loses control of the car and crashes into a fence. The vehicle's airbags deploy, and both Sarah and Baylee are shaken up but not physically injured. Sarah threatens to sue Baylee for negligence. Sarah's lawsuit is likely to be:
A. successful, because Baylee owed Sarah a duty of care.
B. successful, because Baylee was negligent.
C. unsuccessful, because Sarah was not injured.
Unsuccessful, because Sarah was also negligent
Astor Manufacturing stores hazardous and volatile chemicals in its warehouse. The warehouse has state-of-the-art equipment to make sure the chemicals do not explode. An unexpected earthquake shakes the warehouse, causing the chemicals to explode and injure William, a passerby on a nearby sidewalk. Astor Manufacturing is:
strictly liable for William's injuries.
Liable to William only if the company was grossly negligent.
Not liable to William because he satisfied its duty of care to passersby.
Not liable to William because Jason voluntarily assumed the risk of injury
Glen is a dairy farmer who owns 500 milk cows. His fences are in poor repair, and his cows are often found eating the grass on Hank's land. Hank believes that Glen is responsible for damages to Hank's land on a theory of strict liability. The court will most likely find that Glen is:
Liable, because cattle are animals, not humans.
Liable, because Glen did not contain his animals.
Liable, even though the animals did not pose a serious risk of harm to people.
None of the other choices are correct.
Mack is injured by a tractor manufactured by WestCo. In order to defend against a negligence claim based upon the product, WestCo may show that it exercised due care by all of the following except:
A. Using the appropriate production process.
B. Placing adequate warnings on the label to inform the user of dangers to which an ordinary person might not be aware.
C. Inspecting and testing any purchased components used in the final product.
D. Showing the absence of privity of contract between it and the consumer.
John purchases a blender from JuiceMart. A crack in the plastic casing causes the blade to swing out of control and nearly injure John's arm. John is shaken up by the incident but otherwise uninjured. John's strict product liability suit will most likely:
A. Fail because John did not incur physical harm to self or property.
B. Fail because the blender was not in a defective condition.
C. Succeed because JuiceMart was in the business of selling that product.
D. Succeed because the blender was not substantially changed from the time the product was sold to the time the injury was sustained.
Carl sues Goldman Manufacturing, alleging he suffered injuries as a result of a design defect in Goldman's food processor. To prevail in this lawsuit, Carl must show that Goldman:
A. Failed to adequately warn him of the danger of harm.
B. Had a reasonable alternative design available, which it failed to use.
C. Met his consumer expectations and that his injury was unintended.
D. Met the relevant statute of limitations or repose.
United Tires uses a faulty design in designing its tires that causes them to blow out after 50,000 miles. Jessa is injured when her right-rear tire incurs a blowout. She can sue United Tires under which of the following theories of strict liability?
Design defect
Manufacturing defect
Unreasonably dangerous product
Market-share liability
Emily, while driving a car manufactured by Toyosan, suffered a side impact collision from another driver. When Toyosan's air bag deployed, it caused damage to Emily's face and teeth as she hit her head against the steering wheel. If Emily sued Toyosan for strict product liability, the court would likely conclude that:
A. Toyosan's air bag did not have a defective product design.
B. Toyosan's air bag was defective because of the consumer-expectations test.
C. Emily misused the product in driving the car.
D. Emily was comparatively negligent for her own injuries.
Fred sued Document Security Company, alleging he had suffered injuries to his hands as a result of attempting to fix a jam in one of Document Security's paper shredders. Fred alleged the shredder was defective because it failed to contain warnings regarding the dangers to fingers and hands while attempting to fix jams. In order to succeed, Fred will have to show:
A. All risk of harm could have been reduced or avoided by the provision of reasonable instructions or warnings by the seller.
B. Paper shredders are inherently dangerous products.
C. The injuries would not have occurred but for the absence of the warnings.
D. Foreseeable risks of harm could have been reduced or avoided by the provision of reasonable instructions or warnings by the seller.
Martha is walking from her office building to her car in a torrential downpour with an umbrella manufactured by Umbrellas USA, Inc. She is struck by lightning and files suit claiming the manufacturer failed to include a warning. A court would likely find that:
A. The umbrella should have included a warning label against using an umbrella in a lightning storm.
B. The seller should have provided a warning because of the foreseeable misuse of an umbrella in a rainstorm with lightning.
C. There is no duty to warn about risks that are obvious or commonly known, such as the risk of lightning occurring during a rainstorm.
D. The plaintiff was partially at fault under the doctrine of comparative negligence.
Harry discovers that a chemical compound has had an adverse impact on his land. The chemical compound is manufactured by five companies. Harry cannot identify which manufacturer's chemical caused the adverse impact to his land. Harry files a product liability lawsuit against all five companies. Harry's case will:
A. Be dismissed because he cannot identify which company contaminated his land.
B. Be dismissed because he cannot apportion liability amongst the five companies.
C. Not be dismissed because Harry can show harm to his land.
D. Not be dismissed against any manufacturer because of market-share liability.
Harvey is driving while intoxicated in his new truck when his tire blows out. He loses control of the truck and crashes into a tree, causing injury to himself and to his vehicle. The tire is determined to be defective. Which of the following defenses would be the most viable to be raised by the tire manufacturer in a product liability cause of action?
Product misuse
Comparative negligence
Preemption
Assumption of risk
Arthur is arrested for the crime of murder. Arthur denies that he committed the crime and is planning a vigorous defense. The state will be required to show evidence to prove its case:
A. By preponderance of the evidence.
B. Beyond a reasonable doubt.
C. With clear and convincing evidence.
D. By completely rebutting all evidence raised by the defendant.
Morris owns a bicycle store. He often leaves Daniel in charge of the store. One Saturday evening, after Daniel leaves the store, Morris discovers that he is missing $900 from the register. If Daniel took the cash, he could be found guilty of the crime of:
Robbery
Embezzlement
Misappropriation
Conversion
Rama advertises on the radio that she is selling a cream guaranteed to grow hair. Rama knows that the cream will not do what she claims it will. Rama may be tried:
A. Under state law only.
For the federal crime of wire fraud
The crime of embezzlement
B. Under international law under the Convention on International Transmissions.
Glenn gives Senator Smith $100,000 so that Senator Smith will make sure the federal government buys all its paper clips from Glenn's company. Glenn has:
Engage in money laundering
Committed the crime of robbery
Committed the crime of fraud
B. Done nothing illegal; this is how interest groups operate to support elected officials.
Justin is the accountant for a trucking company. A driver, Andrew, holds a gun to Justin's head and forces him to steal from the company. Justin falsifies records, obtains cash, and gives it to Andrew. If criminal charges are brought against Justin, he can assert the defense of:
Duress
Mistake of law
Entrapment
Justifiable use of force
Vince relies on his computer skills to have enough money to attend college. He breaks into computer systems to transfer funds to his own accounts. He occasionally gets paid by other students for breaking into the university's computers to alter their grades. Vince is what is commonly referred to as a:
Cyberstalker
Hacker
Tortfeasor
Cybersquatter
{"name":"LAW 1101", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"Assume that Congress passes a law establishing a new administrative agency to oversee cyberlaw issues. The agency writes rules to enable it to carry out its duties. The rules written by the agency will be known as a part of:, The Illinois state legislature passes a law raising the speed limit on certain state roads. This law becomes part of a body of law known as:, The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) passes a new uniform act related to texting while driving. This uniform act:","img":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/3012/images/ogquiz.png"}
More Quizzes
Light or dark academia
5224
Chile
14716
Lads
14713
Test
100
MinerGate mining Poll
420
Let's see what you know!!!
520
Vistara Travel Knowledge Quiz
178726
How ecotricity are you?
420
Pivot Zombie Movie Part 17: Annihilation (Quiz 1)
10515
Gold licences
1365
The Bipro Quiz (A Quiz of pleasure)
5230
Test for the Ministry of Internal Affairs
20100