The Hood - 2017 Amendments Poll
The Hood - 2017 Amendments Poll
Welcome to the Hood's 2017 Amendments Poll! This quiz will help gauge opinions on several proposed changes to our league settings. Your input is valuable in shaping the future of our fantasy league!
- Vote on exciting changes like FAAB waivers and trade deadlines.
- Have your say on team name rules and roster adjustments.
- Help us decide on implementing a keeper system.
Proposition 1: FAAB Waivers.
Moving from a continual rolling list waiver system into a FAAB w/ Continual rolling list tiebreak.
Detailed information below:
We are currently on a continual rolling list system, that starts by giving the team with the 12th pick in the draft the 1st waiver priority. As waivers are used, the order can change. This amendment change would move us into a FAAB system. (with continual rolling list being our tiebreaker format)
FAAB Waivers
Free Agent Acquisition Budgets (FAAB) add another level of realism to the game. Not only do you have to think about the best players to draft, but you also have to take into account your team's acquisition budget.
In a FAAB waivers system, each manager receives a dollar amount to place blind bids on players that are on waivers. The manager with the highest bid at the end of the waiver period claims that player and that bid amount is deducted from the team's acquisition budget.
FAAB Rules
- The FAAB doesn't apply to free-agent pickups.
- Bids are hidden to other managers until a player clears waivers. The winning bid will display in the Transaction log.
- Players with multiple bids placed on them will display under "FAAB Bids" on a league's Transactions log.
- The FAAB system charges you the exact amount you bid if your bid is successful.
- The FAAB budget for teams is $200.
- There isn't an option to force managers to make a minimum bid amount.
-
The waiver priority will only change if 2 or more managers bid the same exact dollar amount on the same player.
- Tiebreakers in which two managers bid the same amount on the same player will be resolved by a continual rolling list.
Yes
No
Proposition 2: Move trade deadline to the Saturday of the 10th NFL week.
The current trade deadline falls on the Saturday within Week 8 of the NFL season. This amendment proposal would move the deadline back 2 weeks to fall on the Saturday within Week 10.
Yes
No
Proposition 3: Lock team names after the regular season starts.
This proposition would directly affect the current ability to change your team name throughout the year. This proposal adds an amendment to the Constitution that instates that after the first game of the season begins, team names will be locked for the remainder of the season. The off-season would then be used for name changes.
Yes
No
Proposition 4: Remove 7th bench spot; add IR spot.
This proposition moves the current bench size of 7 into a bench size of 6. This proposition also adds an IR spot.
For more information, please refer to this page: IR Rules
Yes
No
Proposition 5: Keepers
This proposition would implement a keeper system into our league. There are many different types of keeper settings that we can discuss and try to come to an agreement on in the case that this proposition is passed. This proposition is simply for the general idea of implementing a keeper system, not for any specific type of keeper system.
For more information om what Keepers are and how they work, please refer to this page: Keeper League Info
Yes
No
Proposition 6: Change our PPR settings from 1 PPR to 0.5 PPR
Our current settings award players 1 point per reception. This proposition would change our league settings to award 0.5 per reception.
Yes
No
{"name":"The Hood - 2017 Amendments Poll", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"Welcome to the Hood's 2017 Amendments Poll! This quiz will help gauge opinions on several proposed changes to our league settings. Your input is valuable in shaping the future of our fantasy league!Vote on exciting changes like FAAB waivers and trade deadlines.Have your say on team name rules and roster adjustments.Help us decide on implementing a keeper system.","img":"https:/images/course8.png"}