OMT 2 2223 Vragen uit handboek

A classroom setting with students engaging in a lively discussion about research methodology, with books and laptops around, educational theme

Understanding Research Methodology Quiz

Test your knowledge on research methodology with our engaging quiz! This quiz is designed to challenge your understanding of key concepts in research, including validity, reliability, and the ethics of conducting studies.

  • Multiple choice questions
  • Covering fundamental principles
  • Perfect for students and enthusiasts
77 Questions19 MinutesCreated by LearningEagle202
Which of the following jobs most likely involves producer-ofresearch skills rather than consumer-of-research skills?
Police officer
University professor
Physician
Journalist
As a true empiricist, one should:
Base one’s conclusions on direct observations
Strive to prove all theories with research.
Be sure that one’s research can be applied in a real-world setting.
Discuss one’s ideas in a public setting, such as on social media.
A statement, or set of statements, that describes general principles about how variables relate to one another is a(n)
Prediction
Hypothesis
Empirical observation
Theory
Why is publication an important part of the research process?
Because publication enables practitioners to use the research in applied settings.
Because when a study is published, other scientists can verify or challenge it, making science self-correcting.
Because journalists can make the knowledge available to the general public.
Because publication is the first step of the theory-data cycle.
Which of the following research questions best illustrates an example of basic research?
Has our company’s new marketing campaign led to an increase in sales?
How satisfied are our patients with the sensitivity of the nursing staff?
Does wearing kinesio-tape reduce joint pain in figure skaters?
Can 2-month-old human infants tell the difference between four objects and six objects?
Destiny concluded that her new white noise machine helped her fall asleep last night. She based this conclusion on personal experience, which might have confounds. In this context, a confound means:
Another thing might have also occurred last night to help Destiny fall asleep
Destiny’s experience has left her puzzled or confused.
Destiny has not compared last night with times she didn’t use the white noise machine.
What does it mean to say that research results are probabilistic?
Researchers refer to the probability that their theories are correct.
Research predicts all possible results
Research conclusions explain a certain proportion of possible cases but may not explain all.
If there are exceptions to a research result, it means the theory is probably incorrect.
After two students from his school commit suicide, Marcelino concludes that the most likely cause of death in teenagers is suicide. In fact, suicide is not the most likely cause of death in teens. What happened?
Marcelino was probably a victim of the bias blind spot.
Marcelino was probably influenced by the availability heuristic; he was too influenced by cases that came easily to mind
Marcelino thought about too many examples of teens who died from other causes besides suicide.
Marcelino did not consider possible confounds.
When is it a good idea to base conclusions on the advice of authorities?
When authorities have an advanced degree, such as a Ph.D. Or a master’s degree
When authorities base their advice on research that systematically and objectively compares different conditions.
When the authority’s website has an official-looking logo or domain name
When authorities state they have many years of experience in their area.
Which of the following is the most reliable source for reading the details of a psychological study?
Scientific journals
Online podcasts
Newspaper science pages
Full-length books
In reading an empirical journal article, what two questions should you be asking as you read?
What is the argument? What is the evidence to support the argument?
Why was this research done? Were there any significant findings?
How reputable is (are) the author(s)? Did the findings include support for the hypotheses?
How does this research relate to other research? What are ways to extend this research further?
Which of the following variables are manipulated, rather than measured? (Could be more than one.)
Number of shoes owned, in pairs
A person’s height, in cm
Amount of aspirin a researcher gives a person to take, either 325 mg or 500 mg
Degree of happiness, rated on a scale from 1 to 10.
Which of the following headlines is an association claim?
Chewing Gum Can Improve Your Mood and Focus
Handling Money Decreases Helpful Behavior in Young Children
Workaholism Is Tied to Psychiatric Disorders
Eating Kiwis May Help You Fall Asleep
Which of the following headlines is a frequency claim?
Obese Kids Are Less Sensitive to Tastes
Eighty Percent of Women Feel Dissatisfied with How Their Bodies Look
Feeling Fat? Maybe Facebook Is to Blame
Daycare and Behavior Problems Are Not Linked
Which of the following headlines is a causal claim?
Taking a Deep Breath Helps Minimize High Blood Pressure, Anxiety, and Depression
Younger People Can’t Read Emotions on Wrinkled Faces
Strange But True: Babies Born in the Autumn Are More Likely to Live to 100
Check the Baby! Many New Moms Show Signs of OCD
Which validity would you be interrogating by asking: How well did the researchers measure sensitivity to tastes in this study?
Construct validity
Statistical validity
External validity
Internal validity
In most experiments, trade-offs are made between validities because it is not possible to achieve all four at once. What is the most common trade-off?
Internal and external validity
Construct and statistical validity
Statistical and internal validity
External and statistical validity.
In a study of a new drug for asthma, a researcher finds that the group receiving the drug is doing much better than the control group, whose members are receiving a placebo. Which principle of the Belmont Report requires the researcher to also give the control group the opportunity to receive the new drug?
Informed consent
Justice
Beneficence
Respect for persons
What type of research misconduct involves representing the ideas or words of others as one’s own?
Plagiarism
Obfuscation
Suppression
Data falsification
Which of the following is not one of the three principles of the Belmont Report?
Respect for persons
Justice
Beneficence
Fidelity and responsibility
To study a sample of participants from only one ethnic group, researchers must first demonstrate that the problem being studied is especially prevalent in that ethnic group. This is an application of which principle from the Belmont Report?
Respect for persons
Beneficence
Special protection
Justice
Following a study using deception, how does the researcher attempt to restore an honest relationship with the participant?
By apologizing to the participant and offering monetary compensation for any discomfort or stress.
By debriefing each participant in a structured conversation.
By reassuring the participant that all names and identifiers will be removed from the data.
By giving each participant a written description of the study’s goals and hypotheses, along with references for further reading.
Which of the following correlation coefficients best describes the pictured scatterplot?
R = .78
R = −.95
R = .03
R = −.45
Classify each of the following results as an example of internal reliability, interrater reliability, or test-retest reliability.
  1. A researcher finds that people’s scores on a measure of
    extroversion stay stable over 2 months.
  2. An infancy researcher wants to measure how long a 3-month-old
    baby looks at a stimulus on the right and left sides of a screen.
    Two undergraduates watch a tape of the eye movements of ten
    infants and time how long each baby looks to the right and to the
    left. The two sets of timings are correlated r = .95
  3. A researcher asks a sample of 40 people a set of five items that
    all capture how extroverted they are. The Cronbach’s alpha for
    the five items is found to be .85.
1. Interrater reliability 2. test-retest reliability 3. Internal reliability
1. test-retest reliability 2. Interrater reliability 3. Internal reliability
1. Interrater reliability 2. Internal reliability 3. test-retest reliability
1. Internal reliability 2. Interrater reliability 3. test-retest reliability
Classify each result below as an example of face validity, content validity, convergent and discriminant validity, or criterion validity.
 
  1. A professor gives a class of 40 people his five-item measure of
    conscientiousness (e.g., “I get chores done right away,” “I follow
    a schedule,” “I do not make a mess of things”). Average scores
    are correlated (r = −.20) with how many times each student has
    been late to class during the semester.

  2. A professor gives a class of 40 people his five-item measure of
    conscientiousness (e.g., “I get chores done right away,” “I follow
    a schedule,” “I do not make a mess of things”). Average scores
    are more highly correlated with a self-report measure of tidiness
    (r = .50) than with a measure of general knowledge (r = .09).

  3. The researcher e-mails his five-item measure of
    conscientiousness (e.g., “I get chores done right away,” “I follow
    a schedule,” “I do not make a mess of things”) to 20 experts in
    personality psychology and asks them if they think his items are
    a good measure of conscientiousness.

  4. The researcher e-mails his five-item measure of
    conscientiousness (e.g., “I get chores done right away.” “I follow
    a schedule,” “I do not make a mess of things”) to 20 experts in
    personality psychology and asks them if they think he has
    included all the important aspects of conscientiousness.
1. Content validity 2. Convergent and discriminant validity 3. Face validity 4. Criterion validity
1. Criterion validity 2. Convergent and discriminant validity 3. Content validity 4. Face validity
1. Criterion validity 2. Convergent and discriminant validity 3. Face validity 4. Content validity
1. Convergent and discriminant validity 2. Criterion validity 3. Face validity 4. Content validity
The following item appears on a survey: “Was your cell phone purchased within the last two years and have you downloaded the most recent updates?” What is the biggest problem with this wording?
It is a leading question.
It involves negative wording.
It is a double-barreled question.
It is not on a Likert scale.
In which of the following situations do people most accurately answer survey questions?
When they are describing the reasons for their own behavior.
When they are describing what happened to them, especially after important events
When they are describing their subjective experience; how they personally feel about something.
People almost never answer survey questions accurately
Which of the following makes it more likely that behavioral observations will have good interrater reliability?
A masked study design
A clear codebook
Using naive, untrained coders
Open-ended responses
Which one of the following is a means of controlling for observer bias?
Using unobtrusive observations
Waiting for the participants to become used to the observer
Making sure the observer does not know the study’s hypotheses.
Measuring physical traces of behavior rather than observing behavior directly
Which of the following is a way of preventing reactivity?
Waiting for the participants to become used to the observer.
Making sure the observers do not know the study’s hypotheses
Making sure the observer uses a clear codebook.
Ensuring the observers have good interrater reliability.
Which of the following four terms is not synonymous with the others?
Generalizable sample
Externally valid sample
Representative sample
Biased sample
A researcher’s population of interest is New York City dog owners. Which of the following samples is most likely to generalize to this population of interest?
A sample of 25 dog owners visiting dog-friendly New York City parks.
A sample of 25 dog owners who have appointments for their dogs at veterinarians in the New York City area.
A sample of 25 dog owners selected at random from New York City pet registration records.
A sample of 25 dog owners who visit New York City’s ASPCA website.
Which of the following samples is most likely to generalize to its population of interest?
A convenience sample of 12,000
A quota sample of 120
A stratified random sample of 120
A self-selected sample of 120,000
Externally valid samples are more important for some research questions than for others. For which of the following research questions will it be most important to use an externally valid sampling technique?
Estimating the proportion of U.S. Teens who are depressed.
Testing the association between depression and illegal drug use in U.S. teens
Testing the effectiveness of support groups for teens with depression.
Suppose you hear that conscientious people are more likely to get regular health checkups. Which of the following correlations between conscientiousness and getting checkups would probably support this claim?
R = .03
r = .45
R = -.35
R = -1.0
Which of these associations will probably be plotted as a bar graph rather than a scatterplot?
The more conscientious people are, the greater the likelihood they’ll get regular health checkups.
Level of depression is linked to the amount of exercise people get.
Students at private colleges get higher GPAs than those at public colleges
Level of chronic stomach pain in kids is linked to later anxiety as adults
A study found that people who like spicy foods are generally risk takers. Which of the following questions interrogates the construct validity of this correlation?
How strong is the effect?
Did the study use a random sample of people?
Were there any outliers in the relationship?
How well did they measure each variable: risk taking and liking spicy foods?
Darrin reads a story reporting that students at private colleges get higher GPAs than those at public colleges. He wonders if this means going to a private college causes you to have a higher GPA. If so, he’ll go to a private college! Applying the three causal criteria, Darrin knows there is covariance here. He also knows there is temporal precedence because you choose a college first, and then you get your GPA. Which of the following questions would help Darrin ask about the third criterion, internal validity?
Could there be restriction of range?
Is the link between private college and high grades the same for both men and women?
. How did they decide what qualifies a college as private or public?
Is there some other reason these two are related? Maybe better students are more likely to go to private colleges, and they are also likely to get better grades?
Which of the following sentences describes a moderator for the relationship between risk taking and liking spicy foods?
There is a positive relationship between liking spicy foods and risk taking for men, but no relationship for women.
Older adults tend to like spicy foods less than younger adults.
The relationship between liking spicy foods and risk taking is the same for people in cities and in rural areas.
A headline about social media use makes the following (bivariate) association claim: “Social media use is linked to lower grades in college.” The two variables in this headline are:
Social media use and quality of grades
High social media use or low social media use.
Good grades or poor grades.
Suppose a researcher uses a longitudinal design to study the relationship between social media use (e.g., Instagram and Snapchat) and grades over time. She measures both of these variables in Year 1 and then measures both variables again in Year 2. Which of the following is an example of an autocorrelation in the results?
The correlation between social media use in Year 1 and social media use in Year 2.
The correlation between social media use in Year 1 and grades in Year 2.
The correlation between grades in Year 1 and social media use in Year 2
The correlation between grades in Year 1 and social media use in Year 1
In the longitudinal study described in Question 2, which pattern of cross-lag correlations would indicate that social media use leads to lower grades (rather than the reverse)?
Grades at Year 1 shows a strong correlation with social media use at Year 2, but social media use at Year 1 shows a weak correlation with grades at Year 2.
Grades at Year 1 shows a weak correlation with social media use at Year 2, but social media use at Year 1 shows a strong correlation with grades at Year 2.
Grades at Year 1 shows a strong correlation with social media use at Year 2, and social media use at Year 1 shows a strong correlation with grades at Year 2.
Consider this statement: “People who use social media got worse grades in college, even when the researchers controlled for the level of college preparation (operationalized by SAT scores) of the students.” What does it mean?
Social media use and grades are correlated only because both of these are associated with SAT score.
SAT score is a third variable that seems to explain the association between social media use and grades.
SAT score can be ruled out as a third variable explanation for the correlation between social media use and college grades.
Which of the following statements is an example of a mediator of the relationship between social media use and college grades?
Social media use and college grades are more strongly correlated among nonathletes, and less strongly correlated among athletes
Social media use and college grades are only correlated with each other because they are both related to the difficulty of the major. Students in more difficult majors get worse grades, and those in difficult majors have less time to use social media
Social media use and college grades are correlated because social media use leads to less time studying, which leads to lower grades.
A news outlet reported on a study of people with dementia. The study found that among patients with dementia, bilingual people had been diagnosed 3–4 years later than those who were monolingual. What are the variables in this bivariate association?
Being bilingual or monolingual
Being bilingual or not, and age at dementia diagnosis
Age at dementia diagnosis
The journalist reported that the relationship between bilingualism and age at diagnosis did not change, even when the researchers controlled for level of education. What does this suggest?
That the relationship between bilingualism and dementia onset is probably attributable to the third variable: level of education.
That the relationship between bilingualism and dementia onset is not attributable to the potential third variable: level of education.
That being bilingual can prevent dementia.
Researchers speculated that the reason bilingualism is associated with later onset of dementia is that bilingual people develop richer connections in the brain through their experiences in managing two languages, and these connections help stave off dementia symptoms. This statement describes:
A mediator
A moderator
A third variable
Why does Max’s experiment satisfy the causal criterion of temporal precedence?
 
Max ran an experiment in which he asked people to shake hands with an
experimenter (played by a female friend) and rate the experimenter’s
friendliness using a self-report measure. The experimenter was always the
same person and used the same standard greeting for all participants.
People were randomly assigned to shake hands with her either after she
had cooled her hands under cold water or after she had warmed her hands
under warm water. Max’s results found that people rated the experimenter
as friendlier when her hands were warm than when they were cold
Because Max found a difference in rated friendliness between the two conditions, cold hands and warm hands
Because the participants shook the experimenter’s hand before rating her friendliness.
Because the experimenter acted the same in all conditions, except having cold or warm hands.
Because Max randomly assigned people to the warm hands or cold hands condition.
In Max’s experiment, what was a control variable?
 
Max ran an experiment in which he asked people to shake hands with an
experimenter (played by a female friend) and rate the experimenter’s
friendliness using a self-report measure. The experimenter was always the
same person and used the same standard greeting for all participants.
People were randomly assigned to shake hands with her either after she
had cooled her hands under cold water or after she had warmed her hands
under warm water. Max’s results found that people rated the experimenter
as friendlier when her hands were warm than when they were cold
The participants’ rating of the friendliness of the experimenter.
The temperature of the experimenter’s hands (warm or cold).
The gender of the students in the study
The standard greeting the experimenter used while shaking hands
What type of design is Max’s experiment?
 
Max ran an experiment in which he asked people to shake hands with an
experimenter (played by a female friend) and rate the experimenter’s
friendliness using a self-report measure. The experimenter was always the
same person and used the same standard greeting for all participants.
People were randomly assigned to shake hands with her either after she
had cooled her hands under cold water or after she had warmed her hands
under warm water. Max’s results found that people rated the experimenter
as friendlier when her hands were warm than when they were cold.
Posttest-only design
Pretest/posttest design
Concurrent-measures design
Repeated-measures design
Max randomly assigned people to shake hands either with the “warm hands” experimenter or the “cold hands” experimenter. Why did he randomly assign participants?
 
Max ran an experiment in which he asked people to shake hands with an
experimenter (played by a female friend) and rate the experimenter’s
friendliness using a self-report measure. The experimenter was always the
same person and used the same standard greeting for all participants.
People were randomly assigned to shake hands with her either after she
had cooled her hands under cold water or after she had warmed her hands
under warm water. Max’s results found that people rated the experimenter
as friendlier when her hands were warm than when they were cold.
Because he had a within-groups design.
Because he wanted to avoid selection effects.
Because he wanted to avoid an order effect.
Because he wanted to generalize the results to the population of students at his university.
Which of the following questions would you use to interrogate the
construct validity of Max’s experiment?
 
Max ran an experiment in which he asked people to shake hands with an
experimenter (played by a female friend) and rate the experimenter’s
friendliness using a self-report measure. The experimenter was always the
same person and used the same standard greeting for all participants.
People were randomly assigned to shake hands with her either after she
had cooled her hands under cold water or after she had warmed her hands
under warm water. Max’s results found that people rated the experimenter
as friendlier when her hands were warm than when they were cold.
How large is the effect size comparing the rated friendliness of the warm hands and cold hands conditions?
How well did Max’s “experimenter friendliness” rating capture participants’ actual impressions of the experimenter?
Were there any confounds in the experiment?
Can we generalize the results from Max’s friend to other experimenters with whom people might shake hands?
Dr. Weber conducted a long-term study in which people were tested on happiness, asked to make two new friends, and then tested on happiness 1 month later. He noticed that six of the most introverted people dropped out by the last session. Therefore, his study might have which of the following internal validity threats?
Attrition
Maturation
Selection
Regression
How is a testing threat to internal validity different from an instrumentation threat?
A testing threat can be prevented with random assignment; an instrumentation threat cannot
A testing threat applies only to within-groups designs; an instrumentation threat applies to any type of study design
A testing threat can be prevented with a double-blind study; an instrumentation threat can be prevented with a placebo control.
A testing threat refers to a change in the participants over time; an instrumentation threat refers to a change in the measuring instrument over time.
A regression threat applies especially:
When there are two groups in the study: an experimental group and a control group
When the researcher recruits a sample whose average is extremely low or high at pretest.
In a posttest-only design
When there is a small sample in the study
Dr. Banks tests to see how many training sessions it takes for dogs to learn to “Sit and stay.” She randomly assigns 60 dogs to two reward conditions: one is miniature hot dogs, the other is small pieces of steak. Surprisingly, she finds the dogs in each group learn “Sit and stay” in about the same number of sessions. Given the design of her study, what is the most likely explanation for this null effect?
The dogs loved both treats (her reward manipulation has a ceiling effect).
She used too many dogs.
She didn’t use a manipulation check.
There were too many individual differences among the dogs.
Dr. Banks modifies her design and conducts a second study. She uses the same number of dogs and the same design, except now she rewards one group of dogs with miniature hot dogs and another group with pieces of apple. She finds a big difference, with the hot-dogs group learning the command faster. Dr. Banks avoided a null result this time because her design:
Increased the between-groups variability
Decreased the within-groups variability
Improved the study’s internal validity
When a study has a large number of participants and a small amount of unsystematic variability (low measurement error, low levels of situation noise), then it has a lot of:
Internal validity
Manipulation checks
Dependent variables
Power and precision
Why might the Wood team have conducted their study as a factorial design?
To test how well positive self-statements work, compared to no statements.
To compare the moods of high self-esteem and low self-esteem people.
To test whether the effect of positive self-statements would depend on a person’s level of self-esteem.
What are the factors in this study?
Self-esteem level: high versus low
Self-statement instructions: positive versus none
Self-esteem level: high versus low; and self-statement instructions: positive versus none
Positive mood
There is an interaction in the results. How do you know?
When the cell means are graphed, the lines are not parallel.
The difference between low and high self-esteem is larger for the positive self-statement condition and smaller for the “no statement” condition.
Positive self-statements raised the mood of high self-esteem people and lowered the mood of low self-esteem people
All of the above.
Which of the following sentences describes the main effect for selfesteem in the Wood study?
Overall, the moods of high self-esteem people are more positive than the moods of low self-esteem people.
Mood depended on both the participants’ level of self-esteem and what self-statement condition they were in.
Overall, the moods of people in the “I am a lovable person” condition are about the same as the moods of people in the “no statement” condition
Positive self-statements raised the moods of high self-esteem people and lowered the moods of low self-esteem people.
This study is an example of a(n):
Independent-groups factorial design
Within-groups factorial design
Mixed factorial design
Suppose these researchers ran their study again, but this time they compared how high or low self-esteem people responded to three kinds of statements: Positive self-statements, negative selfstatements, and no statements. What kind of design would this be?
2 x 2
2 x 3
2 x 2 x 2
6 x 1
What is the term for a quasi-experimental design with at least one treatment group and one comparison group, in which the participants are measured once and have not been randomly assigned to the groups?
Nonequivalent control group design
Independent-groups design
Factorial design
Reversal design
Which of these is not a reason for a researcher to select a quasiexperimental design?
To enhance external validity
To avoid the ethical issues a true experiment would cause.
To ensure internal validity
To take advantage of real-world opportunities to study phenomena and events.
Researchers studied preteens at an outdoor education camp that prevented kids from using devices with screens, such as cell phones (Uhls et al., 2014). They predicted the camp would improve children’s nonverbal communication skills. One group of sixth graders attended the camp in the spring. They were compared with a group of sixth graders from the same school who had not attended the camp. The kids were tested on how well they could read emotions in faces. The camp group took the emotion test on Monday and Friday (the first and last days of their camp week); the control group took the emotion test on Monday and Friday of a regular school week. What type of design was this?
Interrupted time-series design
Nonequivalent control group interrupted time-series design
Nonequivalent control group posttest-only design
Nonequivalent control group pretest/posttest design
For the kids’ camp study, you could ask: Did the researchers use a reliable and valid test of nonverbal communication skills? You would be asking about which kind of validity?
Construct validity
Statistical validity
Internal validity
External validity
The researchers found that the ability to read emotions in faces improved significantly in the kids who had been to the camp, but not in the control kids. Which of the following would be a threat to internal validity in this study?
If the kids who went to camp were selected for their low levels of emotional communication skills, but the control children were not
If the kids in the two groups were not representative of children from their local school district
If the sample size of the study was very small.
A psychologist is working with four siblings, all of whom exhibit violent behavior toward one another. The children’s parents are instructed to record the number of violent behaviors each child exhibits in the hour before dinner for 1 week. The parents then begin using a positive reinforcement technique to shape the behavior of the youngest child, while continuing to record the behavior of all children. The recording continues, and the technique is used on one additional child each week. By the end of 6 weeks, there is a significant decrease in violent behaviors for each of the children. What type of design did the psychologist use?
Stable-baseline design
Multiple-baseline design
Reversal design
Interrupted time-series design
Which of these is not a method for addressing the external validity of the conclusions of a small-N study?
Triangulate by comparing results with other research
Specify a limited population to which to generalize
Randomly assign people to the treatment and control conditions.
Specify that the result applies only to the participant studied
If you repeat a study and find the same results as the first time, what can you say about the original study?
It is replicable.
It is statistically significant.
It is valid.
It is consistent.
When researchers conduct a replication study in which they have the same variables at an abstract level but use different operationalizations of each variable, what type of study is it?
Direct replication
Meta-analysis
Conceptual replication
Replication-plus-extension
Which of these new research practices is most relevant for preventing HARKing?
Open data
Open materials
Preregistration
Using a larger sample
Which of the following claims is most likely to have been tested in generalization mode?
Four out of 10 teenagers can’t identify fake news when they see it.
Reading stressful news makes adults anxious
People who walk faster live longer.
Which of these is a field setting?
A psychology lab with a hidden camera
A neuropsychology lab with an MRI machine
A preschool playground with video cameras
A biology lab with galvanic skin response detectors
Which of these statements is true of external validity?
Psychologists usually strive to generalize to all people.
For generalization to a population, the larger the sample, the better
External validity comes from how the sample is obtained, rather than sample size
A sample that contains female college students can generalize to all female college students.
{"name":"OMT 2 2223 Vragen uit handboek", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"Test your knowledge on research methodology with our engaging quiz! This quiz is designed to challenge your understanding of key concepts in research, including validity, reliability, and the ethics of conducting studies.Multiple choice questionsCovering fundamental principlesPerfect for students and enthusiasts","img":"https:/images/course2.png"}
Powered by: Quiz Maker