TOEFL Experts Reading Practice 6

 
Reading Section
 
 
This section measures your ability to understand academic passages in English. You can skip questions and go back to them later as long as there is time remaining.
 
 
 
 
Now begin the Reading section.
 
Reading Section
 
 
This section measures your ability to understand academic passages in English. You can skip questions and go back to them later as long as there is time remaining.
 
 
 
 
Now begin the Reading section.

Modern Schools of Acting

TragicComicMasksHadriansVillamosaic-e1416899356853

   The eminent Russian theatre director Konstantin Stanislavski brought his Moscow Art Theatre to New York City in 1922. The piercing, psychological truths portrayed by actors trained in his technique surprised and captivated the American theatrical community, since this realism was largely unknown in the mannered, external style then current in the United States. The Stanislavski technique soon became the new standard. Its rise was spearheaded by a handful of young professional actors in New York; these disciples would form The Group Theatre, which dedicated itself to training and performing in that mode. This technique would begin to dominate theatre acting. Later it would spread to film in the United States, then throughout the Western world. However, a philosophical schism split The Group Theatre, and three dominant sects emerged, each led by a former original member. While all won success and respect, each became more convinced in the superiority of his or her approach.

   Lee Strasberg and The Actors’ Studio. Undoubtedly, Lee Strasberg (1901–82) garnered the greatest share of fame and fortune. His school, The Actors’ Studio, at which a mere handful of the thousand annual applicants were accepted, won world renown as the epicenter of theatrical craft without commercial constraints. This was not surprising, as Strasberg had already basked in the limelight as co-founder and acknowledged leader of The Group Theatre—itself known for both its acting and intensive summer retreats devoted to training in virtually an athletic sense—during its groundbreaking successes in the 1930s. Furthermore, Strasberg codified Stanislavski’s approach into a famous educational system of actor training known as “The Method.” Strasberg’s training revolved around “affective memory,” infusing the emotional memories from the actor’s own life into that of the character.

   Public recognition of Strasberg as the guru of the art form was bolstered by the notable list of stars who had studied with him. In addition, while he rarely worked as an actor, one such performance earned him an Academy Award nomination for Best Supporting Actor. Today, decades after his death, The Actors’ Studio remains an acclaimed institution, although belief in its superiority is now more prevalent in the general public than in the professional community.

   Sanford Meisner and The Neighborhood Playhouse. Sanford Meisner (1905–97) was Strasberg’s junior by four years. The younger man became a founding member of The Group Theatre and scored several artistic triumphs, including directing a production of Waiting for Lefty, which won acclaim both artistically and for its condemnation of the suffering of the working class during the Great Depression. Eventually, however, Meisner disagreed with Strasberg over the effectiveness of “affective memory.” After it became known that Stanislavski himself had abandoned this technique, this disagreement became an artistic breach between the two men. 

   Meisner then headed the acting program at The Neighborhood Playhouse School of the Theatre. In that capacity, he transformed the school into a prestigious institution that exists to this day and developed his own acting curriculum, in which the actor prepared by channeling emotional imagination rather than delving into past experiences. While Meisner also trained an abundance of stars, he remained less widely known than Strasberg. Professionally, however, the Meisner technique is now the preferred and predominant technique in modern actor training. Sadly, the friendship between these two men did not survive their artistic divorce. While they both largely remained in Manhattan, they rarely spoke in the decades before Strasberg’s death.

   Stella Adler and the Stella Adler Studio of Acting. Stella Adler (1901–92), another original member of The Group Theatre, also broke with Strasberg over “affective memory” and developed her own version of actor training in the studio that she created. Unlike the men, who were the children of tradesmen, Stella Adler was part of a legendary acting family of the Yiddish theatre in New York. While she had a more extensive acting career, she too became most admired as an acting coach. Some of the great stars, including Marlon Brando, publicly credited their success to Adler’s coaching. Although the studio she founded continues, her version of actor training has been less impactful, probably because the two men had a stronger institutional base and because the force of her singular personality was an immensely important component of her teaching.

Modern Schools of Acting

TragicComicMasksHadriansVillamosaic-e1416899356853

   The eminent Russian theatre director Konstantin Stanislavski brought his Moscow Art Theatre to New York City in 1922. The piercing, psychological truths portrayed by actors trained in his technique surprised and captivated the American theatrical community, since this realism was largely unknown in the mannered, external style then current in the United States. The Stanislavski technique soon became the new standard. Its rise was spearheaded by a handful of young professional actors in New York; these disciples would form The Group Theatre, which dedicated itself to training and performing in that mode. This technique would begin to dominate theatre acting. Later it would spread to film in the United States, then throughout the Western world. However, a philosophical schism split The Group Theatre, and three dominant sects emerged, each led by a former original member. While all won success and respect, each became more convinced in the superiority of his or her approach.

   Lee Strasberg and The Actors’ Studio. Undoubtedly, Lee Strasberg (1901–82) garnered the greatest share of fame and fortune. His school, The Actors’ Studio, at which a mere handful of the thousand annual applicants were accepted, won world renown as the epicenter of theatrical craft without commercial constraints. This was not surprising, as Strasberg had already basked in the limelight as co-founder and acknowledged leader of The Group Theatre—itself known for both its acting and intensive summer retreats devoted to training in virtually an athletic sense—during its groundbreaking successes in the 1930s. Furthermore, Strasberg codified Stanislavski’s approach into a famous educational system of actor training known as “The Method.” Strasberg’s training revolved around “affective memory,” infusing the emotional memories from the actor’s own life into that of the character.

   Public recognition of Strasberg as the guru of the art form was bolstered by the notable list of stars who had studied with him. In addition, while he rarely worked as an actor, one such performance earned him an Academy Award nomination for Best Supporting Actor. Today, decades after his death, The Actors’ Studio remains an acclaimed institution, although belief in its superiority is now more prevalent in the general public than in the professional community.

   Sanford Meisner and The Neighborhood Playhouse. Sanford Meisner (1905–97) was Strasberg’s junior by four years. The younger man became a founding member of The Group Theatre and scored several artistic triumphs, including directing a production of Waiting for Lefty, which won acclaim both artistically and for its condemnation of the suffering of the working class during the Great Depression. Eventually, however, Meisner disagreed with Strasberg over the effectiveness of “affective memory.” After it became known that Stanislavski himself had abandoned this technique, this disagreement became an artistic breach between the two men. 

   Meisner then headed the acting program at The Neighborhood Playhouse School of the Theatre. In that capacity, he transformed the school into a prestigious institution that exists to this day and developed his own acting curriculum, in which the actor prepared by channeling emotional imagination rather than delving into past experiences. While Meisner also trained an abundance of stars, he remained less widely known than Strasberg. Professionally, however, the Meisner technique is now the preferred and predominant technique in modern actor training. Sadly, the friendship between these two men did not survive their artistic divorce. While they both largely remained in Manhattan, they rarely spoke in the decades before Strasberg’s death.

   Stella Adler and the Stella Adler Studio of Acting. Stella Adler (1901–92), another original member of The Group Theatre, also broke with Strasberg over “affective memory” and developed her own version of actor training in the studio that she created. Unlike the men, who were the children of tradesmen, Stella Adler was part of a legendary acting family of the Yiddish theatre in New York. While she had a more extensive acting career, she too became most admired as an acting coach. Some of the great stars, including Marlon Brando, publicly credited their success to Adler’s coaching. Although the studio she founded continues, her version of actor training has been less impactful, probably because the two men had a stronger institutional base and because the force of her singular personality was an immensely important component of her teaching.

(P1)  The eminent Russian theatre director Konstantin Stanislavski brought his Moscow Art Theatre to New York City in 1922. The piercing, psychological truths portrayed by actors trained in his technique surprised and captivated the American theatrical community, since this realism was largely unknown in the mannered, external style then current in the United States. The Stanislavski technique soon became the new standard. Its rise was spearheaded by a handful of young professional actors in New York; these disciples would form The Group Theatre, which dedicated itself to training and performing in that mode. This technique would begin to dominate theatre acting. Later it would spread to film in the United States, then throughout the Western world. However, a philosophical schism split The Group Theatre, and three dominant sects emerged, each led by a former original member. While all won success and respect, each became more convinced in the superiority of his or her approach.

Q: According to paragraph 1, what most interested actors and theatergoers in the United States about the Stanislavski technique initially?
The arrival of Russian artists
The revelation of psychological truths
The use of this technique in film
The conflict among the three Group Theatre members
(P1)  The eminent Russian theatre director Konstantin Stanislavski brought his Moscow Art Theatre to New York City in 1922. The piercing, psychological truths portrayed by actors trained in his technique surprised and captivated the American theatrical community, since this realism was largely unknown in the mannered, external style then current in the United States. The Stanislavski technique soon became the new standard. Its rise was spearheaded by a handful of young professional actors in New York; these disciples would form The Group Theatre, which dedicated itself to training and performing in that mode. This technique would begin to dominate theatre acting. Later it would spread to film in the United States, then throughout the Western world. However, a philosophical schism split The Group Theatre, and three dominant sects emerged, each led by a former original member. While all won success and respect, each became more convinced in the superiority of his or her approach.

Q: According to paragraph 1, the Stanislavski technique was considered groundbreaking in the United States because
It portrayed realism
It originated in Russia
It produced mannered, artificial performances
It was also applicable to film acting
(P2)  Lee Strasberg and The Actors’ Studio. Undoubtedly, Lee Strasberg (1901–82) garnered the greatest share of fame and fortune. His school, The Actors’ Studio, at which a mere handful of the thousand annual applicants were accepted, won world renown as the epicenter of theatrical craft without commercial constraints. This was not surprising, as Strasberg had already basked in the limelight as co-founder and acknowledged leader of The Group Theatre—itself known for both its acting and intensive summer retreats devoted to training in virtually an athletic sense—during its groundbreaking successes in the 1930s. Furthermore, Strasberg codified Stanislavski’s approach into a famous educational system of actor training known as “The Method.” Strasberg’s training revolved around “affective memory,” infusing the emotional memories from the actor’s own life into that of the character.

Q:  According to paragraph 2, as part of their educational development, Strasberg trained actors to
Apply for admission to the Actors’ Studio
Portray athletes on stage
Draw on their personal experiences while acting
Find alternatives to Stanislavski’s techniques
(P2)  Lee Strasberg and The Actors’ Studio. Undoubtedly, Lee Strasberg (1901–82) garnered the greatest share of fame and fortune. His school, The Actors’ Studio, at which a mere handful of the thousand annual applicants were accepted, won world renown as the epicenter of theatrical craft without commercial constraints. This was not surprising, as Strasberg had already basked in the limelight as co-founder and acknowledged leader of The Group Theatre—itself known for both its acting and intensive summer retreats devoted to training in virtually an athletic sense—during its groundbreaking successes in the 1930s. Furthermore, Strasberg codified Stanislavski’s approach into a famous educational system of actor training known as “The Method.” Strasberg’s training revolved around “affective memory,” infusing the emotional memories from the actor’s own life into that of the character.

Q:  Which of the sentences below best expresses the essential information in the highlighted sentence in paragraph 2? Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or leave out essential information.
Additionally, Strasberg and Stanislavski worked together to write a training manual called “The Method.“
In addition, Strasberg created a covert code called “The Method” so that actors could study acting privately.
Moreover, Stanislavski approved of “The Method,” Strasberg’s training system for actors.
Strasberg also organized Stanislavski’s techniques into the well-known training system, “The Method.”
→(P3)  Public recognition of Strasberg as the guru of the art form was bolstered by the notable list of stars who had studied with him. In addition, while he rarely worked as an actor, one such performance earned him an Academy Award nomination for Best Supporting Actor. Today, decades after his death, The Actors’ Studio remains an acclaimed institution, although belief in its superiority is now more prevalent in the general public than in the professional community.

Q:  The word bolstered in the passage is closest in meaning to
Supported
Celebrated
Undermined
Tainted
(P2)  Lee Strasberg and The Actors’ Studio. Undoubtedly, Lee Strasberg (1901–82) garnered the greatest share of fame and fortune. His school, The Actors’ Studio, at which a mere handful of the thousand annual applicants were accepted, won world renown as the epicenter of theatrical craft without commercial constraints. This was not surprising, as Strasberg had already basked in the limelight as co-founder and acknowledged leader of The Group Theatre—itself known for both its acting and intensive summer retreats devoted to training in virtually an athletic sense—during its groundbreaking successes in the 1930s. Furthermore, Strasberg codified Stanislavski’s approach into a famous educational system of actor training known as “The Method.” Strasberg’s training revolved around “affective memory,” infusing the emotional memories from the actor’s own life into that of the character.
 
→(P3)  Public recognition of Strasberg as the guru of the art form was bolstered by the notable list of stars who had studied with him. In addition, while he rarely worked as an actor, one such performance earned him an Academy Award nomination for Best Supporting Actor. Today, decades after his death, The Actors’ Studio remains an acclaimed institution, although belief in its superiority is now more prevalent in the general public than in the professional community.

Q:  According to paragraphs 2 and 3, all of the following are mentioned as Strasberg’s achievements EXCEPT:
He founded a successful school.
He helped start a professional theatre.
He won several Academy Awards.
He taught many successful film stars.
→(P4)  Sanford Meisner and The Neighborhood Playhouse. Sanford Meisner (1905–97) was Strasberg’s junior by four years. The younger man became a founding member of The Group Theatre and scored several artistic triumphs, including directing a production of Waiting for Lefty, which won acclaim both artistically and for its condemnation of the suffering of the working class during the Great Depression. Eventually, however, Meisner disagreed with Strasberg over the effectiveness of “affective memory.” After it became known that Stanislavski himself had abandoned this technique, this disagreement became an artistic breach between the two men. 

Q:  The word condemnation in the passage is closest in meaning to
Example
Promotion
Criticism
Exploitation
→(P4)  Sanford Meisner and The Neighborhood Playhouse. Sanford Meisner (1905–97) was Strasberg’s junior by four years. The younger man became a founding member of The Group Theatre and scored several artistic triumphs, including directing a production of Waiting for Lefty, which won acclaim both artistically and for its condemnation of the suffering of the working class during the Great Depression. Eventually, however, Meisner disagreed with Strasberg over the effectiveness of “affective memory.” After it became known that Stanislavski himself had abandoned this technique, this disagreement became an artistic breach between the two men. 

Q:  According to paragraph 4, all of the following are true statements about Sanford Meisner EXCEPT:
He was younger than Strasberg.
He acted in Waiting for Lefty.
He disagreed with Strasberg.
He was artistically successful.
→(P5)  Meisner then headed the acting program at The Neighborhood Playhouse School of the Theatre. In that capacity, he transformed the school into a prestigious institution that exists to this day and developed his own acting curriculum, in which the actor prepared by channeling emotional imagination rather than delving into past experiences. While Meisner also trained an abundance of stars, he remained less widely known than Strasberg. Professionally, however, the Meisner technique is now the preferred and predominant technique in modern actor training. Sadly, the friendship between these two men did not survive their artistic divorce. While they both largely remained in Manhattan, they rarely spoke in the decades before Strasberg’s death.

Q:  According to paragraph 5, which of the following is true of Meisner and his career?
His technique made use of imagination rather than memory.
His technique was shunned by professionals.
His methods relied on accurate portrayals of physical mannerisms.
He taught in the neighborhood where he lived.
→(P5)  Meisner then headed the acting program at The Neighborhood Playhouse School of the Theatre. In that capacity, he transformed the school into a prestigious institution that exists to this day and developed his own acting curriculum, in which the actor prepared by channeling emotional imagination rather than delving into past experiences. While Meisner also trained an abundance of stars, he remained less widely known than Strasberg. Professionally, however, the Meisner technique is now the preferred and predominant technique in modern actor training. Sadly, the friendship between these two men did not survive their artistic divorce. While they both largely remained in Manhattan, they rarely spoke in the decades before Strasberg’s death.

Q:  The phrase delving into in the passage is closest in meaning to
Fantasizing about
Closely examining
Largely ignoring
Disagreeing with
→(P6)  Stella Adler and the Stella Adler Studio of Acting. Stella Adler (1901–92), another original member of The Group Theatre, also broke with Strasberg over “affective memory” and developed her own version of actor training in the studio that she created. Unlike the men, who were the children of tradesmen, Stella Adler was part of a legendary acting family of the Yiddish theatre in New York. While she had a more extensive acting career, she too became most admired as an acting coach. Some of the great stars, including Marlon Brando, publicly credited their success to Adler’s coaching. Although the studio she founded continues, her version of actor training has been less impactful, probably because the two men had a stronger institutional base and because the force of her singular personality was an immensely important component of her teaching.

Q:  The word singular in the passage is closest in meaning to
Abrasive
Pleasant
Ordinary
Striking
→(P6)  Stella Adler and the Stella Adler Studio of Acting. Stella Adler (1901–92), another original member of The Group Theatre, also broke with Strasberg over “affective memory” and developed her own version of actor training in the studio that she created. Unlike the men, who were the children of tradesmen, Stella Adler was part of a legendary acting family of the Yiddish theatre in New York. While she had a more extensive acting career, she too became most admired as an acting coach. Some of the great stars, including Marlon Brando, publicly credited their success to Adler’s coaching. Although the studio she founded continues, her version of actor training has been less impactful, probably because the two men had a stronger institutional base and because the force of her singular personality was an immensely important component of her teaching.

Q:  What is the author’s purpose in presenting the information in paragraph 6
To demonstrate that Adler was the most successful of the three
To illustrate the importance of the Yiddish theatre
To contrast Stella Adler’s career with those of her two former colleagues
To offer a feminist critique of New York theatre in the 1930s
In paragraph 6 of the passage, there is a missing sentence. The paragraph is repeated below and shows four letters [A], [B], [C], and [D] that indicate where the following sentence could be added.
 
Thus, a history of the Stanislavski technique in the United States in the twentieth century would arguably state that there were two lasting versions of his technique but three great acting coaches.
 
Where would the sentence best fit?

→(P6)   Stella Adler and the Stella Adler Studio of Acting. Stella Adler (1901–92), another original member of The Group Theatre, also broke with Strasberg over “affective memory” and developed her own version of actor training in the studio that she created.[A] Unlike the men, who were the children of tradesmen, Stella Adler was part of a legendary acting family of the Yiddish theatre in New York.[B] While she had a more extensive acting career, she too became most admired as an acting coach. Some of the great stars, including Marlon Brando, publicly credited their success to Adler’s coaching.[C] Although the studio she founded continues, her version of actor training has been less impactful, probably because the two men had a stronger institutional base and because the force of her singular personality was an immensely important component of her teaching.[D]
Directions: An introductory sentence for a brief summary of the passage is provided below. Complete the summary by selecting the THREE answer choices that express the most important ideas in the passage. Some sentences do not belong in the summary because they express ideas that are not presented in the passage or are minor ideas in the passage. This question is worth 2 points

 
  • In 1922, the Stanislavski technique came to New York and irrevocably changed how actors trained and performed.
Today Stanislavski’s approach remains the basis of several variations of actor training, but the dominant one was developed by a less known personage.
One of the leading practitioners of Stanislavski’s method acting infused it with the culture of the Yiddish theatre.
The three major disciples of Stanislavski in the United States created prominent schools of acting with long lists of alumni.
Acting according to Stanislavski’s approach proved to be more influential in film acting than in theatre acting.
The dispute that led to major variations of Stanislavski’s techniques involved how to infuse realistic emotions into acting portrayals.
The innovation of modern acting training destroyed a friendship.
{"name":"TOEFL Experts Reading Practice 6", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"Reading Section This section measures your ability to understand academic passages in English. You can skip questions and go back to them later as long as there is time remaining. Now begin the Reading section.","img":"https://cdn.poll-maker.com/27-996543/tragiccomicmaskshadriansvillamosaic-e1416899356853.jpg?sz=1200"}
Powered by: Quiz Maker