TOEFL Experts Reading Practice 19

 
Reading Section
 
 
This section measures your ability to understand academic passages in English. You can skip questions and go back to them later as long as there is time remaining.
 
 
 
 
Now begin the Reading section.
 
Reading Section
 
 
This section measures your ability to understand academic passages in English. You can skip questions and go back to them later as long as there is time remaining.
 
 
 
 
Now begin the Reading section.
Operation Barbarossa and Napoleon
 
 maxresdefault

  On June 22, 1941, one year to the day after the signing of an armistice following his successful invasion of France, Adolf Hitler launched Operation Barbarossa, the code name for Nazi Germany’s invasion of Russia (then the dominant part of the Soviet Union). Hitler had amassed an invading army of over 3 million soldiers, still the largest invading force in world history. What followed paralleled, in many ways, another failed invasion of Russia more than 100 years earlier by another tyrant: Napoleon Bonaparte, ruler of France. For both leaders, invading Russia would be the turning point in a war they had previously dominated, and would lead to their final defeat elsewhere in Europe.

  Operation Barbarossa involved an invasion along three fronts. Army Group North was to conquer the Baltic countries and ultimately Leningrad. Army Group Center was to invade the heartland of present-day Russia and proceed to Moscow, the Soviet capital. Army Group South had orders to invade and conquer Ukraine and various southern cities in Russia to capture key economic resources, such as grain and oil. The conquest was one of annihilation: Nazi Germany viewed Soviet communism (“Bolshevism”) as the mortal enemy of the Nazi’s “National Socialist” political doctrine. Furthermore, National Socialism viewed Slavic and Jewish people—both predominant in Russia—as inferior to Germans. Therefore, the war was about conquest of land at all costs, and many civilians were targeted for forced labor or assassination.

  By contrast, Napoleon’s invasion was based on a trade disagreement. The real enemy of Napoleon was Britain, with whom France was at war, and his invasion of Russia was intended to force the Russian nobility to stop trading with Britain. His goal was to use his grande armée (French for “great army”) to swiftly defeat the inferior Russian defending forces, march to Moscow, and force Tsar Alexander I to sign an agreement ceasing all trade with Britain. This would culminate in Britain’s inability to continue to wage war with France, Napoleon reasoned. Britain would have to seek peace, thereby ending the decade-long Napoleonic Wars. Supposedly thus “fighting for an end to fighting,” Napoleon’s forces began the invasion on June 24, 1812, crossing the Neman River into Russia.

  For each leader, the invasion had substantial initial success but ultimately met disaster. Russia is an enormous country geographically, and the distance to Moscow dwarfed that covered by any other invasion that either leader had successfully completed before. Supply lines for both invading armies quickly became stretched thin; troops and equipment were faced with exhaustion. To make matters worse, Russians engaged in scorched-earth tactics: as they retreated from the invading army, they burned or otherwise destroyed everything of value, so that no invading forces could use it. This dashed any hopes of living off the land. In addition, the Russian winter is exceptionally cold, and both leaders failed to make appropriate provisions for winter warfare, as both thought their invasion could be successfully completed before winter set in.Finally, while Russian armed resistance was light at first, it dramatically intensified as the invaders approached Moscow. By the end, invading troops met fierce Russian opposition while also combating hunger, privation, and extremely cold temperatures.

  Unlike Hitler, Napoleon did successfully reach Moscow, only to find it ablaze and vacated. He waited with his army, trying to force the Russian tsar, now in exile, to sign a treaty. Meanwhile his army continued to starve, and the weather turned sharply colder. Napoleon was thus forced to leave Moscow to find provisions and shelter for his army, and this departure turned into an all-out retreat as appropriate provisions and shelter could not be found. As it attempted to flee Russia, Napoleon’s army was massacred by hunger and temperatures of –25⁰ Celsius much more than by Russian troops.

  Hitler’s invasion took a somewhat different path to disaster. While Army Groups North and South succeeded in fulfilling their objectives, Hitler’s Army Group Center was stopped about 15 miles short of Moscow by a Soviet counteroffensive. Army Group Center successfully fended off the Soviets and survived the cold Russian winter, but had suffered heavy losses. In 1942, German strategic objectives changed, and much of the strength of the invading force was redirected to southern Russia. The German advance to Moscow was thereby halted, and resounding defeats at the Battles of Stalingrad and Kursk permanently crippled the German war machine. It was only a matter of time before Soviet forces from the East and other Allied troops from the West could overwhelm and defeat Nazi Germany.

Operation Barbarossa and Napoleon
 
 maxresdefault

  On June 22, 1941, one year to the day after the signing of an armistice following his successful invasion of France, Adolf Hitler launched Operation Barbarossa, the code name for Nazi Germany’s invasion of Russia (then the dominant part of the Soviet Union). Hitler had amassed an invading army of over 3 million soldiers, still the largest invading force in world history. What followed paralleled, in many ways, another failed invasion of Russia more than 100 years earlier by another tyrant: Napoleon Bonaparte, ruler of France. For both leaders, invading Russia would be the turning point in a war they had previously dominated, and would lead to their final defeat elsewhere in Europe.

  Operation Barbarossa involved an invasion along three fronts. Army Group North was to conquer the Baltic countries and ultimately Leningrad. Army Group Center was to invade the heartland of present-day Russia and proceed to Moscow, the Soviet capital. Army Group South had orders to invade and conquer Ukraine and various southern cities in Russia to capture key economic resources, such as grain and oil. The conquest was one of annihilation: Nazi Germany viewed Soviet communism (“Bolshevism”) as the mortal enemy of the Nazi’s “National Socialist” political doctrine. Furthermore, National Socialism viewed Slavic and Jewish people—both predominant in Russia—as inferior to Germans. Therefore, the war was about conquest of land at all costs, and many civilians were targeted for forced labor or assassination.

  By contrast, Napoleon’s invasion was based on a trade disagreement. The real enemy of Napoleon was Britain, with whom France was at war, and his invasion of Russia was intended to force the Russian nobility to stop trading with Britain. His goal was to use his grande armée (French for “great army”) to swiftly defeat the inferior Russian defending forces, march to Moscow, and force Tsar Alexander I to sign an agreement ceasing all trade with Britain. This would culminate in Britain’s inability to continue to wage war with France, Napoleon reasoned. Britain would have to seek peace, thereby ending the decade-long Napoleonic Wars. Supposedly thus “fighting for an end to fighting,” Napoleon’s forces began the invasion on June 24, 1812, crossing the Neman River into Russia.

  For each leader, the invasion had substantial initial success but ultimately met disaster. Russia is an enormous country geographically, and the distance to Moscow dwarfed that covered by any other invasion that either leader had successfully completed before. Supply lines for both invading armies quickly became stretched thin; troops and equipment were faced with exhaustion. To make matters worse, Russians engaged in scorched-earth tactics: as they retreated from the invading army, they burned or otherwise destroyed everything of value, so that no invading forces could use it. This dashed any hopes of living off the land. In addition, the Russian winter is exceptionally cold, and both leaders failed to make appropriate provisions for winter warfare, as both thought their invasion could be successfully completed before winter set in.Finally, while Russian armed resistance was light at first, it dramatically intensified as the invaders approached Moscow. By the end, invading troops met fierce Russian opposition while also combating hunger, privation, and extremely cold temperatures.

  Unlike Hitler, Napoleon did successfully reach Moscow, only to find it ablaze and vacated. He waited with his army, trying to force the Russian tsar, now in exile, to sign a treaty. Meanwhile his army continued to starve, and the weather turned sharply colder. Napoleon was thus forced to leave Moscow to find provisions and shelter for his army, and this departure turned into an all-out retreat as appropriate provisions and shelter could not be found. As it attempted to flee Russia, Napoleon’s army was massacred by hunger and temperatures of –25⁰ Celsius much more than by Russian troops.

  Hitler’s invasion took a somewhat different path to disaster. While Army Groups North and South succeeded in fulfilling their objectives, Hitler’s Army Group Center was stopped about 15 miles short of Moscow by a Soviet counteroffensive. Army Group Center successfully fended off the Soviets and survived the cold Russian winter, but had suffered heavy losses. In 1942, German strategic objectives changed, and much of the strength of the invading force was redirected to southern Russia. The German advance to Moscow was thereby halted, and resounding defeats at the Battles of Stalingrad and Kursk permanently crippled the German war machine. It was only a matter of time before Soviet forces from the East and other Allied troops from the West could overwhelm and defeat Nazi Germany.

(P1)  On June 22, 1941, one year to the day after the signing of an armistice following his successful invasion of France, Adolf Hitler launched Operation Barbarossa, the code name for Nazi Germany’s invasion of Russia (then the dominant part of the Soviet Union). Hitler had amassed an invading army of over 3 million soldiers, still the largest invading force in world history. What followed paralleled, in many ways, another failed invasion of Russia more than 100 years earlier by another tyrant: Napoleon Bonaparte, ruler of France. For both leaders, invading Russia would be the turning point in a war they had previously dominated, and would lead to their final defeat elsewhere in Europe.

Q:  The author uses the phrase “What followed paralleled, in many ways, another failed invasion of Russia more than 100 years earlier” for which of the following reasons?
To point out that Napoleon’s invasion and Hitler’s invasion occurred in different centuries
To initiate a comparison between Operation Barbarossa and Napoleon’s invasion of Russia
To introduce a broad category of military actions consisting of failed invasions of Russia
To compare the size of Hitler’s army with that of Napoleon’s army
(P1)  On June 22, 1941, one year to the day after the signing of an armistice following his successful invasion of France, Adolf Hitler launched Operation Barbarossa, the code name for Nazi Germany’s invasion of Russia (then the dominant part of the Soviet Union). Hitler had amassed an invading army of over 3 million soldiers, still the largest invading force in world history. What followed paralleled, in many ways, another failed invasion of Russia more than 100 years earlier by another tyrant: Napoleon Bonaparte, ruler of France. For both leaders, invading Russia would be the turning point in a war they had previously dominated, and would lead to their final defeat elsewhere in Europe.

Q:  According to paragraph 1, which of the following was true of both Operation Barbarossa and Napoleon’s invasion of Russia?
Both Hitler and Napoleon were considered tyrants.
Both invasions failed because of inadequate planning.
Both invasions followed military victories in France.
Both invasions precipitated events that eventually led to defeat.
(P2)  Operation Barbarossa involved an invasion along three fronts. Army Group North was to conquer the Baltic countries and ultimately Leningrad. Army Group Center was to invade the heartland of present-day Russia and proceed to Moscow, the Soviet capital. Army Group South had orders to invade and conquer Ukraine and various southern cities in Russia to capture key economic resources, such as grain and oil. The conquest was one of annihilation: Nazi Germany viewed Soviet communism (“Bolshevism”) as the mortal enemy of the Nazi’s “National Socialist” political doctrine. Furthermore, National Socialism viewed Slavic and Jewish people—both predominant in Russia—as inferior to Germans. Therefore, the war was about conquest of land at all costs, and many civilians were targeted for forced labor or assassination.

Q:  The word “annihilation” in the passage is closest in meaning to
Eradication
Dismissal
Introduction
Victory
→(P2)  Operation Barbarossa involved an invasion along three fronts. Army Group North was to conquer the Baltic countries and ultimately Leningrad. Army Group Center was to invade the heartland of present-day Russia and proceed to Moscow, the Soviet capital. Army Group South had orders to invade and conquer Ukraine and various southern cities in Russia to capture key economic resources, such as grain and oil. The conquest was one of annihilation: Nazi Germany viewed Soviet communism (“Bolshevism”) as the mortal enemy of the Nazi’s “National Socialist” political doctrine. Furthermore, National Socialism viewed Slavic and Jewish people—both predominant in Russia—as inferior to Germans. Therefore, the war was about conquest of land at all costs, and many civilians were targeted for forced labor or assassination.

Q:  All of the following are mentioned in paragraph 2 as places targeted by Operation Barbarossa EXCEPT:
France
Ukraine
Cities in southern Russia
Leningrad
→(P3)  By contrast, Napoleon’s invasion was based on a trade disagreement. The real enemy of Napoleon was Britain, with whom France was at war, and his invasion of Russia was intended to force the Russian nobility to stop trading with Britain. His goal was to use his grande armée (French for “great army”) to swiftly defeat the inferior Russian defending forces, march to Moscow, and force Tsar Alexander I to sign an agreement ceasing all trade with Britain. This would culminate in Britain’s inability to continue to wage war with France, Napoleon reasoned. Britain would have to seek peace, thereby ending the decade-long Napoleonic Wars. Supposedly thus “fighting for an end to fighting,” Napoleon’s forces began the invasion on June 24, 1812, crossing the Neman River into Russia.

Q:  The word “inferior” in the passage is closest in meaning to
Exceptional
High-handed
Substandard
Derivative
→(P3)  By contrast, Napoleon’s invasion was based on a trade disagreement. The real enemy of Napoleon was Britain, with whom France was at war, and his invasion of Russia was intended to force the Russian nobility to stop trading with Britain. His goal was to use his grande armée (French for “great army”) to swiftly defeat the inferior Russian defending forces, march to Moscow, and force Tsar Alexander I to sign an agreement ceasing all trade with Britain. This would culminate in Britain’s inability to continue to wage war with France, Napoleon reasoned. Britain would have to seek peace, thereby ending the decade-long Napoleonic Wars. Supposedly thus “fighting for an end to fighting,” Napoleon’s forces began the invasion on June 24, 1812, crossing the Neman River into Russia.

Q:  According to the paragraph, why did Napoleon believe that a successful invasion of Russia would lead Britain to seek peace, thereby ending the decade-long Napoleonic Wars?
Britain was supplying Russia with the means necessary to wage war against France.
Napoleon thought that Russia would be defeated if it were forced to sign a trade agreement ceasing all trade with Britain.
Both countries were trading with other countries in Europe, leading to the Napoleonic Wars.
Conquering Russia would force Russia to stop providing Britain with supplies for war against France.s
→(P4)  For each leader, the invasion had substantial initial success but ultimately met disaster. Russia is an enormous country geographically, and the distance to Moscow dwarfed that covered by any other invasion that either leader had successfully completed before. Supply lines for both invading armies quickly became stretched thin; troops and equipment were faced with exhaustion. To make matters worse, Russians engaged in scorched-earth tactics: as they retreated from the invading army, they burned or otherwise destroyed everything of value, so that no invading forces could use it. This dashed any hopes of living off the land. In addition, the Russian winter is exceptionally cold, and both leaders failed to make appropriate provisions for winter warfare, as both thought their invasion could be successfully completed before winter set in.Finally, while Russian armed resistance was light at first, it dramatically intensified as the invaders approached Moscow. By the end, invading troops met fierce Russian opposition while also combating hunger, privation, and extremely cold temperatures.

Q:  The word privation in the passage is closest in meaning to
Expansion
Hardship
Bounty
Restlessness
→(P4)  For each leader, the invasion had substantial initial success but ultimately met disaster. Russia is an enormous country geographically, and the distance to Moscow dwarfed that covered by any other invasion that either leader had successfully completed before. Supply lines for both invading armies quickly became stretched thin; troops and equipment were faced with exhaustion. To make matters worse, Russians engaged in scorched-earth tactics: as they retreated from the invading army, they burned or otherwise destroyed everything of value, so that no invading forces could use it. This dashed any hopes of living off the land. In addition, the Russian winter is exceptionally cold, and both leaders failed to make appropriate provisions for winter warfare, as both thought their invasion could be successfully completed before winter set in.Finally, while Russian armed resistance was light at first, it dramatically intensified as the invaders approached Moscow. By the end, invading troops met fierce Russian opposition while also combating hunger, privation, and extremely cold temperatures.

Q:  Which of the following does the author conclude was an important factor in the failure of Napoleon’s invasion of Russia?
Napoleon’s decision to begin his invasion in the middle of winter
The relatively slight distances that invading troops were to cover
The scorched-earth response of the retreating defenders
Intense military resistance at the beginning of the invasion
→(P5)  Unlike Hitler, Napoleon did successfully reach Moscow, only to find it ablaze and vacated. He waited with his army, trying to force the Russian tsar, now in exile, to sign a treaty. Meanwhile his army continued to starve, and the weather turned sharply colder. Napoleon was thus forced to leave Moscow to find provisions and shelter for his army, and this departure turned into an all-out retreat as appropriate provisions and shelter could not be found. As it attempted to flee Russia, Napoleon’s army was massacred by hunger and temperatures of –25⁰ Celsius much more than by Russian troops.

Q:  The word “ablaze” in the passage is closest in meaning to
Burning
Embattled
Deserted
Trashed
→(P6)  Hitler’s invasion took a somewhat different path to disaster. While Army Groups North and South succeeded in fulfilling their objectives, Hitler’s Army Group Center was stopped about 15 miles short of Moscow by a Soviet counteroffensive. Army Group Center successfully fended off the Soviets and survived the cold Russian winter, but had suffered heavy losses. In 1942, German strategic objectives changed, and much of the strength of the invading force was redirected to southern Russia. The German advance to Moscow was thereby halted, and resounding defeats at the Battles of Stalingrad and Kursk permanently crippled the German war machine. It was only a matter of time before Soviet forces from the East and other Allied troops from the West could overwhelm and defeat Nazi Germany.

Q:  The word “crippled” in the passage is closest in meaning to
Surrendered
Empowered
Incapacitated
Extinguished
In paragraph 3 of the passage, there is a missing sentence. The paragraph is repeated below and shows four letters [A], [B], [C], and [D] that indicate where the following sentence could be added.
 
Napoleon correctly believed that the goods Russia was sending to Britain were helping Britain to wage war against France, and he felt it was imperative to stop these shipments.

 
Where would the sentence best fit?

→(P3)  By contrast, Napoleon’s invasion was based on a trade disagreement.[A] The real enemy of Napoleon was Britain, with whom France was at war, and his invasion of Russia was intended to force the Russian nobility to stop trading with Britain.[B] His goal was to use his grande armée (French for “great army”) to swiftly defeat the inferior Russian defending forces, march to Moscow, and force Tsar Alexander I to sign an agreement ceasing all trade with Britain.[C] This would culminate in Britain’s inability to continue to wage war with France, Napoleon reasoned. Britain would have to seek peace, thereby ending the decade-long Napoleonic Wars.[D] Supposedly thus “fighting for an end to fighting,” Napoleon’s forces began the invasion on June 24, 1812, crossing the Neman River into Russia.
Select from the eight phrases below TWO that characterize Operation Barbarossa (Hitler’s invasion) only, TWO that characterize Napoleon’s invasion only, and THREE that characterize BOTH invasions. One of the phrases will NOT be used. This question is worth 2 points.
 
Select from the eight phrases below TWO that characterize Operation Barbarossa (Hitler’s invasion) only, TWO that characterize Napoleon’s invasion only, and THREE that characterize BOTH invasions. One of the phrases will NOT be used. This question is worth 2 points.
 
Succeeded in reaching Moscow
Attempted to invade and conquer Ukraine
Supply lines for the invading army became stretched thin
Met fierce Russian opposition
Army was destroyed in Moscow
Goal of invasion was annihilation
Invasion was based on a trade disagreement
Failed to make appropriate provisions for winter warfare
{"name":"TOEFL Experts Reading Practice 19", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"Reading Section This section measures your ability to understand academic passages in English. You can skip questions and go back to them later as long as there is time remaining. Now begin the Reading section.","img":"https://cdn.poll-maker.com/28-1026507/maxresdefault.jpg?sz=1200-00000000001000005300"}
Powered by: Quiz Maker