Psych220- Lecture 6
What are the three things all social groups have?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
Social norms are a groups's prescriptions for....
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
What is group comprehensiveness?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
How do groups affect us?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
What is a socio-evaluative threat?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
What happens in your brain when you get really stressed out?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
What is social loafing?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
What is group polarization?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
What is group think?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
What was the challenger disaster an example of?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
What was the exploding whale an example of?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
How do we prevent group think?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
What is conformity?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
What is compliance?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
How does conformity operate?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
What situations increase informational social influence?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
What experiment was done to test informational social influence?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
How do you resist informational social influence?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
What is normative social influence?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
What causes normative social influence?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
What is the social impact theory?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
What factors increase conformity based on normative social influence?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
How do you resist normative social influence?
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
What is minority dissent
Group think
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Sherif's dot study
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Informative social influence and normative social influence
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Group think
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
{"name":"Psych220- Lecture 6", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"What are the three things all social groups have?, Social norms are a groups's prescriptions for....","img":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/3012/images/ogquiz.png"}
More Quizzes
Harry Potter Trivia Round 3 (Picture Round)
1050
Aula De Imagenologia - 13/07/2020
13612
Quanto sei scout?
10513
Summer Bridge Final Quiz
13614
Thai Language Vocabulary - Free Practice
201020005
Pharmacy Assistant - Free Knowledge Assessment
201017913
Am I Dehydrated - Free Hydration Self-Check
201019111
CFCM Practice - Free Federal Contract Manager Prep
201028683
Geometry Unit 1 Test - Free Vocabulary & Angles
201019397
US Airport - Identify Airports on the Map
201019300
Vital Signs - Free Online Practice Questions
201018234
Body Orientation - Planes & Directional Terms
201025691