Psych220- Lecture 6
What are the three things all social groups have?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
Social norms are a groups's prescriptions for....
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
What is group comprehensiveness?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
How do groups affect us?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
What is a socio-evaluative threat?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
What happens in your brain when you get really stressed out?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
What is social loafing?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
What is group polarization?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
What is group think?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
What was the challenger disaster an example of?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
What was the exploding whale an example of?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
How do we prevent group think?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
What is conformity?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
What is compliance?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
How does conformity operate?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
What situations increase informational social influence?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
What experiment was done to test informational social influence?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
How do you resist informational social influence?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
What is normative social influence?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
What causes normative social influence?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
What is the social impact theory?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
What factors increase conformity based on normative social influence?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
How do you resist normative social influence?
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
What is minority dissent
Social facilitation and social loafing can have effects on individual performances. Created by an interaction of: task complexity, individual evaluation and arousal
A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unamity override their motivation to realisticallu appraise alternative courses of action
Cortisol will be released, which will constric blood vessels in the hippocampus, inhibiting learning and memory
Group think
Look for non-human evidence, remember that you have a consistency bias, and speak out if something goes wrong
Tendency to preform worse on simple tasks and better on complex tasks if they are in a group instead of alone
Tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of their members.
Situations that lead us to conform in order to be liked
Ambiguity, crisis, and when you think others are experts
The behaviour, values and beliefs of a group's members
The study of the factors that increase conformity based on normative social influence
Change in behaviour due to the real or imagined influence of other people
Change in behaviour due to direct requests from another person
Informative social influence and normative social influence
Sherif's dot study
Group think
EXTREME evaluation apprehension, in which the body responds with cortisol
Observing minority dissenters may not result in explicit behaviour change, but has a deeper impact on impact on implicity attitudes.This was tested with the green-blue screen
The power of social norms and conformity and social approval
Strength, immedicacy and number of group members
Find an ally, social norms allow for the occasional deviation, and idiosyncrasy credits
-Social norms, social roles, group comprehensiveness
-Ask someone to be devil's advocate, leader remains impartial, seek feedback from others outside the group, create subgroups which suggest ideas to the whole group, anonymous opinions from group members
The degree to which a groups is or is perceived to be close knit and similar
{"name":"Psych220- Lecture 6", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"What are the three things all social groups have?, Social norms are a groups's prescriptions for....","img":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/3012/images/ogquiz.png"}