Imm & Asylum
EU Immigration and Asylum Quiz
Test your knowledge on EU immigration and asylum laws with our comprehensive quiz! This quiz covers various aspects of EU citizenship rights, family reunification directives, and protection mechanisms for refugees and asylum seekers. Whether you're a student, legal professional, or simply interested in the topic, this quiz will help enhance your understanding.
- 21 engaging questions
- Multiple choice and checkbox formats
- Score your knowledge and learn more
Article 21 (1) TFEU establishes an individual right to every Union citizen to move and reside with the EU. Is this statement true?
No, it is Directive 2004/38 that establishes such a right
Yes. However, this right is subject to limitations and conditions.
No, such a right does not exist under EU law
A law firm requires a certificate of bilingualism for applying for jobs with them. The certificate has to be issued by a local authority after an examination held only in London. This rule is contrary to:
The right to move freely within the EU pursuant Article 21 (1) TFEU
The principle of non-discrimination based on Article 18 TFEU
The principle of Legal certainty
In order to be lawfully resident in the EU for a period up to 5 years, a Union citizen has to:
Not become a burden for the social security system of the host Member State.
Not become a burden for the host Member State and have a regular job.
Not become a burden for the host Member State, have a regular job, and not have committed any serious offense.
A Member State is allowed to automatically expel a Union citizen before he/she becomes a permanent resident, when he/she has become a burden for the social security system of the host Member State. Is this statement true?
Yes.
The Member State may expel a Union citizen but never on an automatic basis.
No, under EU law, Union citizens cannot be expelled on that ground.
After 5 years of lawful residence, a Union citizen would be treated equally as the citizens of the host Member State:
Yes.
Yes but only if he/she does not become a burden for the social security system
No, there would always be limitations.
Mrs. McCarthy, a dual Irish-UK national, wishes to rely on her EU citizenship rights in order to secure a derived right of residence for her Jamaican husband in the UK. Mrs. McCarthy has never resided in another Member State. She has never been in a position of employment, is not self-sufficient and relies of social welfare benefits. Should a derived right of residence be granted to McCarthy's husband?
Yes under Article 20 TFEU.
No.
Yes but only if her husband has sufficient economic resources.
Mrs. Jelo, a third country national mother of a minor child, Union citizen wishes to have her permit of stay renewed. They both reside in the Member State of the nationality of the minor child, they never moved into another Member State and unfortunately she lost her job. Is she entitled to a derived right of residence under EU law?
Yes through her child, on the basis of Article 20 TFEU.
Yes, on the basis of Directive 2004/38.
No.
Article 4 of the Family Reunification Directives obliges the Member States to authorize the entry and residence of certain family members of a third country national lawfully resident in the territory of a Member State. Is this statement true?
Yes.
The Member State may authorize such entry. However, they are not under any obligation.
Yes, but only if the family members come from a 'safe' country.
Under the Family Reunification Directive, the sponsor must fulfill certain requirements:
He/she must have a valid residence permit for at least 1 year and must have reasonable prospect of obtaining the right to permanent residence.
He/she must have a valid residence permit for three years and must have reasonable prospect of obtaining the right to permanent residence.
He/she must have a valid residence permit for at least 1 year and must have reasonable prospect of obtaining the right to permanent residence and have a driving license.
Member States may require third country nationals to pass a civic integration exam, such an assessment of basic knowledge both of the language of the host Member State and of its society. It this statement true?
Yes, provided that the conditions of such a requirement do not make impossible or extremely difficult to exercise the right to family reunification.
No, as the right to family reunification is an absolute fundamental right which should not be submitted to any restriction.
Yes, but only with regards to those third country nationals who have not proved to have sufficient economic resources.
Under the Return Directive, Member States are allowed to impose a detention measure to third country nationals irregularly staying in the territory of a Member State whenever they think it is necessary. Is this statement true?
Yes, as long as they comply with fundamental rights.
No, they can only impose a detention measure on the basis of the grounds provided in Article 15 of that Directive.
No, detention can not be imposed under the Return Directive, as it will delay the removal process.
Mr. Kadzoev while waiting to be returned to Russia, he was held in a detention center in Bulgaria for over three years. Is his detention unlawful?
His detention is unlawful as the maximum duration of detention under the Return Directive is 18 months.
His detention may be considered as lawful if it ascertained that the return had been delayed due to the uncooperative conduct of Mr. Kadzoev.
His detention is lawful as it is up to the length and reasons for the detention of third country nationals irregularly staying in the territory of a Member State.
The fact that a third country national irregularly staying in the territory of a Member State does not possess a valid identity document constitutes by itself 'a risk of absconding' and therefore substantiate the lengthening of the detention beyond six months. Is this statement true?
No, the Court held in Mahdi that this is not the case.
Yes, the Court held in Bouzalmate that this is the case.
No, there is no possibility for the Member State to extend detention beyond the time limit of six months.
Under the Qualification Directive what are the reasons for persecution?
Article 10 provides five reasons for persecution, namely race, nationality, religion, membership of a particular social group and political opinion.
Article 10 provides four reasons of persecution, namely race, religion, membership of a particular social group and political opinion.
Article 10 provides that the reasons for persecution are unlimited thereby the Member States has to offer international protection when there are serious threats to human rights.
EU law prohibits removal of an asylum seeker until a decision on the asylum application is issued. Is this statement true?
Yes, in principle, asylum seekers are allowed to remain in the Member State for the purpose of the procedure until a decision by the responsible authority has been made.
No, they can be expelled at any time.
No, they can be automatically expelled if, for instance, while waiting for the decision to be adopted, they have committed a crime.
Third country nationals who are homosexual can they be regarded as forming a 'particular social group' pursuant Article 10 of the Qualification Directive?
Yes.
No.
Yes but only if they are refrained to express their sexual orientation in private.
Member States may revoke a person's refugee status...
Only where the circumstances on the basis of which the refugee status was granted, have undergone a significant, lasting change in the country of origin so that this person no longer appears to be exposed to the risk of acts of persecution in that country and the competent authorities are able to ensure the necessary protection for that person.
The refugees status cannot be revoked.
The refugee status cannot be revoked only on the person's request.
The principle of non-refoulement means that refugees whether formally recognized or not must not be returned to a country where they have a reason to fear persecution. Is this statement true?
Yes.
No, the principle of non-refoulement only applies to formally recognized refugees.
No, the principle of non-refoulement applies only when there is an ongoing war in the country of origin of the individual seeking for international protection.
In Hirsi vs Italy, the Strasbourg court held that the State must be proactive and undertake relevant investigation with regards to the situation in the State of reception. Is this statement true?
Yes. In particular, they have to make sure that the applicants for refugee status would not be exposed to treatment in breach of the ECHR and that they would be given an effective protection.
Yes, notably they have to rely their investigation on the statements of the competent authorities in the country of reception.
No, it is only up to the applicants for refugee to provide the proof that - if returned - he/she would be exposed to treatment in breach of article 3 ECHR.
The Dublin System is based on the principle of mutual trust which entails that in principle all Member States would provide an equivalent protection to asylum seekers. Is this statement true>
No, the Dublin system recognizes that there might be differences with regards to fundamental rights protection in the Member States.
No, the system imposes different obligations depending on the level of fundamental rights protection afforded in the Member States.
Yes, it is true.
Is the duty of a Member State to observe EU fundamental rights discharged when an asylum seeker is transferred to the Member State responsible, regardless of the situation in the Member State?
Yes.
No, Member States should make sure that an asylum seeker would not be transferred in the Member State of first entry if he/she would exposed to a risk of inhuman treatment.
Yes, it is the Member State responsible to deal with the application for international protection that has to ensure for an adequate fundamental rights protection.
{"name":"Imm & Asylum", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"Test your knowledge on EU immigration and asylum laws with our comprehensive quiz! This quiz covers various aspects of EU citizenship rights, family reunification directives, and protection mechanisms for refugees and asylum seekers. Whether you're a student, legal professional, or simply interested in the topic, this quiz will help enhance your understanding.21 engaging questionsMultiple choice and checkbox formatsScore your knowledge and learn more","img":"https:/images/course2.png"}
More Quizzes
Main concepts in public international law and human rights mechanisms
84128
Day 3 - International Law Quiz
10517
Nature & Definition of International Law
1587
Summative Assessment - Unit: Development
15820
Humanities - Migration Trimester 3
201026
History Study
1166
Law Quiz
52126
History of Public International Law
1478
The United Nations
12613
CONTEMPORARY GLOBAL GOVERNANCE
1051163
Articles human rights
301584
Formative Assessment Ex. b - SB p. 106
4259