MBA CENTRAL APTITUDE QUIZ-2

Generate an image of a professional educational setting with MBA students taking a quiz, featuring elements like books, calculators, and a diverse group of focused individuals.

MBA Central Aptitude Quiz - Version 2

Test your knowledge and enhance your critical thinking skills with our comprehensive MBA Central Aptitude Quiz. This quiz covers various topics, including verbal aptitude, logical reasoning, and quantitative skills. Engage with thought-provoking questions designed to challenge your understanding and improve your analytical abilities.

  • Assess your comprehension of verbal skills.
  • Evaluate your logical reasoning capabilities.
  • Measure your quantitative aptitude.
27 Questions7 MinutesCreated by ThinkingFox121
VERBAL APTITUDE
 
QUESTION 1 TO 5.

Philippe Legrain, a liberal economist has already written a book stoutly defending globalisation. Now he takes on an even more emotive subject in the book ‘Immigrants: Your country needs them’. There is not a shadow of doubt about

his own views. He wants open borders. He believes that they will, on balance, enrich both sending and receiving countries; and he detests bureaucratic restrictions on human freedoms. “Immigrants are not an invading army,” he points out. “They are no different from someone who moves from Manchester to London, or Oklahoma to California, because that is where the jobs are.”

Mr. Legrain has assembled powerful evidence to undermine the economic arguments against immigration. In the case of skilled migrants, that is relatively easy. But for migrants there are hardly any legal tracks across borders. Yet, he argues, they too bring economic benefits and do “little or no harm” to the wages or employment prospects of native workers.

Mr Legrain makes a robust economic case – though he surely understates the impact of immigrants on holding back the pay of the poorest. He is more successful at rebutting the argument that taxpayers give willingly only to those with whom they feel some kinship and that immigration, therefore, jeopardizes support for the welfare state. A willingness to pay taxes to support the poor is independent of levels of immigration, he shows.

Less convincing are his proposals for encouraging immigrants to go home after a period of working abroad. If immigration were temporary people might tolerate it more readily. So why not get immigrants to post a bond on arrival or have a portion of their wages withheld until they leave? The trouble with such ingenious ideas is that immigrants from the world’s poorer countries have many reasons to stay overseas, especially in Europe or America. The financial gains are huge, but they are by no means the only rewards. Life is much easier where there is the rule of law, less petty corruption and a better health-care system than exists at home.

But hospitality to immigration is not just about economics. It is based on fear of change and on racism. It has also been based on growing worries about Muslim terrorism. Such anxieties are not easily assuaged by economic logic. It is striking how little serious protest there was in Britain at the absorption of over 500,000 east European immigrants in the two years after Poland and nine other countries acceded to the European Union in May 2004. Surely at least one reason was that these white Christian Europeans look and think extraordinarily like most British people, and their children will be distinguishable only by their unpronounceable names.

By contrast, many Muslim immigrants and their children have become more estranged. Their ambivalence towards the West and its secular liberalism has appeared to grow, not diminish. It is wholly unreasonable to see most Muslims as potential terrorists – but reason may not have much chance here.

So no government in the rich world is likely to open its borders to all comers, as Mr Legrain urges. For politicians, the tricky question is who to let in. The harsh truth is that voters find it easier to accept immigrants who look and behave as they do than those who are different. That, as a basis for policy, still leaves most of mankind outside the gates.

VERBAL APTITUDE
 
QUESTION 1 TO 5.

Philippe Legrain, a liberal economist has already written a book stoutly defending globalisation. Now he takes on an even more emotive subject in the book ‘Immigrants: Your country needs them’. There is not a shadow of doubt about

his own views. He wants open borders. He believes that they will, on balance, enrich both sending and receiving countries; and he detests bureaucratic restrictions on human freedoms. “Immigrants are not an invading army,” he points out. “They are no different from someone who moves from Manchester to London, or Oklahoma to California, because that is where the jobs are.”

Mr. Legrain has assembled powerful evidence to undermine the economic arguments against immigration. In the case of skilled migrants, that is relatively easy. But for migrants there are hardly any legal tracks across borders. Yet, he argues, they too bring economic benefits and do “little or no harm” to the wages or employment prospects of native workers.

Mr Legrain makes a robust economic case – though he surely understates the impact of immigrants on holding back the pay of the poorest. He is more successful at rebutting the argument that taxpayers give willingly only to those with whom they feel some kinship and that immigration, therefore, jeopardizes support for the welfare state. A willingness to pay taxes to support the poor is independent of levels of immigration, he shows.

Less convincing are his proposals for encouraging immigrants to go home after a period of working abroad. If immigration were temporary people might tolerate it more readily. So why not get immigrants to post a bond on arrival or have a portion of their wages withheld until they leave? The trouble with such ingenious ideas is that immigrants from the world’s poorer countries have many reasons to stay overseas, especially in Europe or America. The financial gains are huge, but they are by no means the only rewards. Life is much easier where there is the rule of law, less petty corruption and a better health-care system than exists at home.

But hospitality to immigration is not just about economics. It is based on fear of change and on racism. It has also been based on growing worries about Muslim terrorism. Such anxieties are not easily assuaged by economic logic. It is striking how little serious protest there was in Britain at the absorption of over 500,000 east European immigrants in the two years after Poland and nine other countries acceded to the European Union in May 2004. Surely at least one reason was that these white Christian Europeans look and think extraordinarily like most British people, and their children will be distinguishable only by their unpronounceable names.

By contrast, many Muslim immigrants and their children have become more estranged. Their ambivalence towards the West and its secular liberalism has appeared to grow, not diminish. It is wholly unreasonable to see most Muslims as potential terrorists – but reason may not have much chance here.

So no government in the rich world is likely to open its borders to all comers, as Mr Legrain urges. For politicians, the tricky question is who to let in. The harsh truth is that voters find it easier to accept immigrants who look and behave as they do than those who are different. That, as a basis for policy, still leaves most of mankind outside the gates.

Q1.) The word ‘here’ in ‘’.... But reason may not have much chance here’’ refers to
The United Kingdom
issues such as immigration
People’s attitude
The book by Philippe Legrain
Q2. Which of the following is NOT the reviewer’s views?
Mr.Legrain does not feel that immigrants hurt the wages of domestic labour.
Tax payers are not willing to support an immigrant population.
Mr. Legrain’s suggestion of allowing immigrants to stay for a fixed period is not feasible.
Immigration is not an issue that can be settled by economics alone.
Q3. The reviewer uses the example of European immigrants to show that
The real issue involved in the acceptance of migrants is racism and fear.
a case by case decision has to be made by the government where immigration is concerned.
people with unpronounceable names are looked at skeptically.
how quickly a given population of immigrants can homogenize with the native population determines their chances of acceptance.
Q4.All of the following are arguments used in favour of open borders EXCEPT:
Immigrants enrich both their country of birth and adoption.
They move where jobs are available.
They are like the native labourers moving in search of better prospects.
They are in favour of globalisation.
Q5.The conclusion ‘no government in the rich world is likely to open its border to all’ is
the reviewer's opinion.
Mr.Legrain’s opinion.
The immigrant’s opinion.
The politician’s view.
Logical Reasoning
Question: 1 to 5
These questions are based on the information given below.
In a zoo there are 7 cages in which 7 different animals – Tiger, Lion, Elephant, Chimpanzee, Gorilla, Deer and Bear are present. The cages are in a row one beside the other, not necessarily in the same order. Further it is known that
(A) the cage in which the Tiger is present is at the extreme right end.
(B) the Deer’s cage is to the right of the Gorilla’s cage.
(C) the Chimpanzee’s cage is three places to the right of
the Elephant’s cage.
(D) the Lion’s cage is to the immediate right of the
Bear’s cage which is to the immediate right of the
Elephant’s cage.
(E) the Gorilla’s cage is not at the extreme end.
Logical Reasoning
Question: 1 to 5
These questions are based on the information given below.
In a zoo there are 7 cages in which 7 different animals – Tiger, Lion, Elephant, Chimpanzee, Gorilla, Deer and Bear are present. The cages are in a row one beside the other, not necessarily in the same order. Further it is known that
(A) the cage in which the Tiger is present is at the extreme right end.
(B) the Deer’s cage is to the right of the Gorilla’s cage.
(C) the Chimpanzee’s cage is three places to the right of
the Elephant’s cage.
(D) the Lion’s cage is to the immediate right of the
Bear’s cage which is to the immediate right of the
Elephant’s cage.
(E) the Gorilla’s cage is not at the extreme end.
Q1. Which of the following animal’s cage is at the extreme left end?
Lion
Elephant
Deer
Gorilla
Q2. . If the cages are numbered from 1 to 7 starting from left end, then which among the following animals is in cage 3?
Gorilla
Deer
Lion
Bear
Q3.Which among the following animals is two places away to the right of the Lion?
Gorilla
Deer
Elephant
Chimpanzee
Q4. Which among the following animals is at the centre?
Gorilla
Deer
Elephant
Chimpanzee
Q5. Which among the following statements is definitely true?
Chimpanzee’s cage and Gorilla’s cage are adjacent to each other.
Deer’s cage is adjacent to Chimpanzee’s cage.
Bear’s cage is two places to the left of Deer’s cage.
There are two cages in between Bear’s cage and Chimpanzee’s cage.
QUANTITATIVE APTITUDE:
QUESTIONS 1 to 10
QUANTITATIVE APTITUDE:
QUESTIONS 1 to 10
Q1.. The average speed for an entire journey is 60 km/hr without considering the stoppages. When the stoppages are considered, the average speed becomes 48 km/hr. How many minutes per hour on an average were the stoppages?
10 minutes
16 minutes
12 minutes
18minutes
Q2. . A person covered the first 40 km of his journey at 50 km/hr, the next 70 km at 35 km/hr and the remaining distance in 12 minutes. If the average speed for the entire journey is 52 km/hr, then find the distance covered in the last stretch of the journey (in km).
46
47
48
49
Q3. Under simple interest, due to the fall in the interest rate by 0.5 percentage point my yearly income from savings came down by ₹884. Find the savings (in ₹)?
178600
176800
177600
178800
Q4. A person invested ₹p at a certain rate of simple interest. After 1, 2 and 3 years it amounted to ₹3/2p, ₹2p, ₹5/2p respectively.
‚¹6p
‚¹10p
‚¹11p
‚¹7p
Q5. Rajesh and Rakesh working alone can complete a piece of work in 12 and 24 days respectively, Rajesh started the work and after a few days Rakesh joined him and the work was completed in 10 days. After how many days did Rakesh join Rajesh?
6
14
12
2
Q6. . A, B and C working independently can complete a certain piece of work in 20, 30 and 60 days respectively. All the three of them worked together for 5 days and then A left. B and C worked for the next 5 days and then B left. The remaining work was then completed by C. What portion of the work did C complete?
1/12
5/12
7/12
6/12
Q7. In a school there are 650 students. The ratio of the number of boys to that of the girls is 8 : 5. How many more girls should join the school so that the ratio becomes 4 : 3?
50
100
150
25
Q8. The ratio of the present ages of a man and his wife is 5 : 4. Which of the following can’t be a possible ratio of their ages 20 years ago?
7 : 5
13 : 10
3 : 2
6 : 5
Q9. The average age of 30 students of a class is 16 years. If the age of the class teacher is also included, than average age of the class, increases by 1 year. Find the age (in years) of the class teacher.
47
46
52
51
Q10. The average runs scored by a batsman, who has played 52 innings, increased by one after an innings of 126. Find the average runs of the batsman before this innings.
71
73
64
58
{"name":"MBA CENTRAL APTITUDE QUIZ-2", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"Test your knowledge and enhance your critical thinking skills with our comprehensive MBA Central Aptitude Quiz. This quiz covers various topics, including verbal aptitude, logical reasoning, and quantitative skills. Engage with thought-provoking questions designed to challenge your understanding and improve your analytical abilities.Assess your comprehension of verbal skills.Evaluate your logical reasoning capabilities.Measure your quantitative aptitude.","img":"https:/images/course2.png"}
Powered by: Quiz Maker