Torts Practice questions

A courtroom scene with legal books and a gavel, depicting the various aspects of tort law and legal responsibility.

Torts Law Challenge

Test your knowledge of tort law with our engaging practice quiz! This quiz will cover a variety of scenarios that involved different torts, helping you understand the complexities of law and legal responsibility.

Whether you are a student preparing for exams or just someone interested in learning more about tort law, this quiz is perfect for you. Topics include:

  • Intentional Torts
  • Negligence
  • Liability
  • Defenses
  • Damages
29 Questions7 MinutesCreated by ChallengingLawyer452
Brian opens a twitter account and makes a highly insensitive tweet. The tweet causes many people to become upset and some even throw up because they are so upset
Brian is liable for Assault
Brian is not liable because he used reasonable care when he wrote the tweet.
Brian is liable for the tort of Trespass to Chattels for misusing his Twitter Account.
Brian is not liable.
Brian is liable for IIED
False imprisonment might be a valid claim in which of the following situations:
Megan tells her roommate to wait in her room while she carries some boxes through the hallway.
Megan knows her roommate is sleeping and locks the door to her room so that the roommate does not come out while Meghan is carrying the boxes. The roommate does not wake up until after Meghan unlocks the door
Meghan’s roommate is highly allergic to peanuts. She and Meghan have a fight and Meghan sits outside the roommates’ door eating peanuts and won’t move when asked
Meghan tells the roommate that the door is locked and that she cannot leave, but the door is not locked, and Meghan never checks to see if it is unlocked.
Quagmire and Peter are neighbors. Peter owns a falcon named Xerxes. Peter spends hours taking care of Xerxes. Moreover, Peter deeply loves his wife Lois. Quagmire is angry at Peter for losing Quagmire’s cat. Quagmire kills Xerxes, then without telling Peter serves what appears to be chicken to Peter at dinner. He then tells Peter it was Xerxes. Quagmire then shoots Lois with a real-looking gun. In fact, the gun is loaded with a stun dart. Lois falls down unconscious after being shot, and Peter thinks she is dead. Quagmire then says, “that’s what you get for losing my cat.” Peter goes into shock and has a heart attack. Quagmire has likely committed which of the following torts against Peter?
IIED
Negligence
Conversion
Battery
A and C
A and D
Under the above facts, Quagmire committed which of the following Torts against Lois?
Battery
False Imprisonment
Trespass
All of the Above
Tom and Peyton were watching a game at Peyton’s house. Peyton became angry when they discussed the best pitcher in the history of baseball. Tom thought the best pitcher was a pitcher who had won several World Series games and pitched well in all of them. That same player also held many records. Peyton thought the best pitcher was the one who didn’t have as many wins in major games but held a few more statistical records. They argued for an hour and when Peyton was fed up, he angrily took a cup of beer Tom was holding. Peyton placed the cup on the table in front of Tom and ordered Tom to leave his house immediately
Peyton is not liable for any tort.--- if there had been no anger/offensiveness then this could be the answer
Peyton could be liable for false imprisonment for keeping Tom there before asking Tom to leave
Peyton could be liable for battery
Peyton could be liable for conversion for taking the cup of beer.—he could have picked it up again
Both C. and D
In 2017 Miami Dolphins cornerback Bobby McClain threw a punch at then New England Patriots receiver Danny Amendola. McClain was ejected from the game. Amendola had a few deep cuts from the punch and later said, “I might expect that kind of cheap shot thing from the Jets, but not the Dolphins (he didn’t really say this).” Amendola sued McClain for his injuries
Amendola assumed the risk of injury by playing football so will not win the lawsuit. (assumption of risk is dead negligence concept)
Amendola was comparatively negligent for not being Julian Edelman (another Patriots receiver).
McClain can’t be held liable unless Amendola sues the Dolphins as a team.
McClain will likely lose the lawsuit.
The privilege of Defense of Property allows a property owner to:
Use deadly force to protect his or her property
Use reasonable force to protect the property
Use any force necessary to protect the property
Do nothing to protect the property
Steven has a chihuahua named Bonecrusher. He keeps the dog inside most of the time, but he allows Bonecrusher outside to run around a bit and go to the bathroom. There is a properly functioning invisible fence around Steven’s yard. When Bonecrusher saw Angela, Steven’s neighbor, walking on the sidewalk he ran through the invisible fence and viciously bit Angela’s lower leg, severing her Achilles tendon. He also severed her pinky finger after she fell. Angela sues Steven. Which of the following is an accurate statement of the law:
Steven is liable for assault.
Angela is liable for trespass
Bonecrusher is liable for battery
Angela cannot recover for any intentional tort
Bellatrix drove her car at a high rate of speed across the campus of Hogwarts University. Harry and Hermine walked across campus while discussing their recent chemistry class. At the same time Professor Dumbledore was riding his bike across campus. Harry and Hermione walked into the crosswalk without looking as Beatrix was approaching at a high rate of speed. Bellatrix swerved to avoid them and hit Professor Dumbledore who was riding his bicycle along the bike path. Dumbledore sues Bellatrix and Bellatrix impleads Harry and Hermine.
Bellatrix could be entirely responsible to pay for Dumbledore’s injuries
Harry and Hermione could be entirely responsible to pay for Dumbledore’s injuries
Harry and Hermione are comparatively negligent
None of the above
Both A & B
The University of the NY Jets Stink (UNYJS) has responded to the many school shootings around the US by setting up a highly efficient system (which they stole from the University of Belicheck). The system sends out texts, emails, tweets and phone calls the moment the University police or administration become aware of an active shooter risk. Kyle and Kenny were in Professor Edelman’s greatness class when an alert went out. Professor Edelman followed procedures and turned the lights out and asked the students to move out of the line of sight from the doors. Eric Cartman, the shooter, was a student at UNYJS. He went from room to room kicking doors open and checking for students. The doors in the classrooms didn’t lock. When Cartman kicked the door open to Kyle and Kenny’s classroom and was preparing to fire on the students, Professor Edelman jumped up and moved to disarm Cartman. Edelman was fast, but before he tackled Cartman, Cartman was able to fire one burst which killed Kenny. All the other students were okay. Kenny’s family sued the University for negligence arguing the doors should have locked from the inside to prevent entry. The University defended arguing its policies were strong and that a shooter kicking in doors to darkened classrooms with no visible students, faculty, or staff was unforeseeable given all the other precautions it took.
The University will likely be liable for not taking all reasonable precautions
The University will not be liable because it had an efficient notification system in place for active shooters
The University will not be liable because it had no special relationship with Kenny
The University will not be liable because Cartman’s actions were an intervening superseding cause of Kenny’s injury.
Assume the same facts as above, but the University had installed proper locking mechanisms on all doors. Cartman shot the door open and entered killing everyone in the classroom
The University will be liable because it had a special relationship with the students
The University will be liable because school shootings were foreseeable
The University will not be liable
The University will not be liable because Cartman’s actions cut the causal chain of liability
Patrick is a lawyer. One day a client visits Patrick at Patrick’s office without a scheduled appointment. Patrick is busy getting ready for a trial in a different case and instructs his staff to tell the client he would be happy to meet at a scheduled time and that the client could schedule an appointment before leaving. The client became angry that Patrick would not meet that day. The client sues Patrick.
Patrick will win the suit
The client will win the suit because Patrick breached his duty of care
The client will win because Patrick is a professional and did not meet the professional standard of care
The client will lose because the client cannot prove he suffered any emotional distress
Cause in fact always requires that
The defendant’s breach of duty proximately caused the plaintiff’s injury
The defendant’s breach of duty contributed in some way to the plaintiff’s injury
The defendant’s breach of duty was a substantial factor in bringing about plaintiff’s injury
The defendant’s breach of duty was a but-for cause of plaintiff’s injury
If A is injured by B’s negligence and then a month later injured again by C’s negligence which of the following statements is accurate
A can collect from B for all harm caused by B, but not for harm caused by C
A can collect for all the harm caused by both accidents from C
B is responsible for all the harm from the time of his negligence, including any harm caused by C
A cannot collect because it is unclear who caused the injuries
Kenny is standing on the corner of Main Street and North Boulevard when a car driven by Cartman collides with a vehicle being driven by Kyle. Cartman was texting while driving and speeding. Kyle was not negligent. Kyle’s car is pushed into a light post by the impact knocking the post over. The light post falls on Kenny killing him. Which of the following is accurate
Both Cartman and Kyle are liable for Kenny’s death
Cartman is liable for Kenny’s death because Kenny was both in the immediate vicinity of Cartman’s negligent actions and it was foreseeable that people near the road could be injured
Cartman is not liable because the light pole falling was an intervening cause
Cartman is not liable because the light pole falling was an intervening superseding cause
Cartman is liable because he should have known Kenny was likely to be killed anytime he is present
Assume the same facts as above but Kyle’s car barely touches the light pole and immediately after Kyle’s car touches the light pole there is an earthquake which loosens the pole before it falls on Kenny
Kyle may be liable for Kenny’s injuries
Cartman is liable for the same reasons as in the prior question
The earthquake is liable
The earthquake was likely an intervening superseding cause
Lois is walking across campus while texting and listening loudly to music on her headphones. She steps into the intersection without looking and is struck by a car driven by Quagmire
Quagmire does not have to pay anything because Lois was contributorily negligent
Lois will be partially responsible for her injuries
Quagmire had the last clear chance to avoid the accident so he will be responsible
Quagmire will be held 100% responsible for Lois’ injuries
Dave and Mary, two MSU Law students, lease an apartment from Susan. The apartment is well maintained, and Dave and Mary are quite careful in making sure that the driveway and sidewalks are shoveled. One day Bob, the local UPS Delivery Person, stops to drop off a package for Dave and Mary. He rings the doorbell, and when no one answers he rings it again. He is suddenly electrocuted by the doorbell. He survives and sues Dave and Mary for his injuries. Dave and Mary implead Susan
Dave and Mary are liable because today a lease is treated like a complete sale of property
Susan is liable because lessors are strictly liable for risks unknown to the lessees
Bob is liable for his own injuries because he should not have rung the bell a second time
None of the above
Assume the same facts as above, but the apartment is located in a large apartment building owned by Susan’s company, Apartments ‘R’ Us. Bob is not electrocuted when he rings the doorbell, but rather is buzzed in by the guard. The guard is unaware that Hans Gruber and his gang of jewel thieves have broken into the building through the garage using a rare diamond tipped drill and custom designed stealth suits in order to steal Dave and Mary’s valuable MSU Law rings. Gruber and his team shoot the guard and Bob. Bob’s estate sues Susan’s company
Susan’s company is not likely to be liable
Susan’s company is liable because they had a duty to protect the building’s common areas
Hans Gruber and his team are liable for negligence in shooting Bob
The Guard was liable for negligence because he did not stop Hans and his team
Peter is temporarily in charge of Pewterschmidt Industries while his father-in-law, the regular CEO of the company, undergoes surgery. Peter sends his CFO Quagmire to deliver some important documents to a branch office. On the way Quagmire stops at a gas station along the road to fill up and get the oil changed in his car. A few minutes later Quagmire is ready to leave the gas station and looks down to turn the radio dial as he pulls away from the pump and he hits Cleveland’s car. Cleveland sues Pewterschmidt Industries.
Cleveland should have sued only Quagmire
Pewterschmidt Industries is likely liable for the damage to Cleveland’s injuries
Quagmire is the only one liable for the damage to Cleveland’s car.
Peter is personally liable for the damage to Cleveland’s car
Stan, who is a senior Vice President for Tegrity Products was driving to work at a high rate of speed. He ran into Kyle and Bebe who were walking on the sidewalk. They sue Tegridy Products
Tegridy Products is unlikely to be liable under the facts as stated in the question
Stan is likely liable for Kyle and Bebe’s injuries
Tegridy Products is likely liable for Stan and Bebe’s injuries due to vicarious liability
Both Stan and Tegridy products are likely to be liable
Both a and b
The state Quahog has imposed a mask mandate to prevent the spread of the Plague 2 disease that causes 10% of people exposed to melt and explode within 30 seconds of exposure. Anybody who does not melt and explode will survive but may carry the Plague 2 without knowing it. The mandate applies indoors and outdoors anytime people who do not live together interact because the disease spreads very easily. There is no vaccine or treatment for Plague 2. Cartman, who is 36 years old, believes that the disease is not real despite knowing several people who have died from it, and he refuses to wear a mask. He meets Kenny on the sidewalk who is also 36 and forgot to wear his mask despite signs everywhere reminding people to wear masks. Kenny catches the Plague 2 from Cartman and 20 seconds later melts before exploding. His estate sues Cartman for negligence
Cartman will likely be liable for Kenny’s death
Kenny will likely be held responsible for his own death
The state of Quahog will likely be liable for not mandating that everyone stay home all the time
Both A and B
All of the above
Both A and C
Gary drives a gas truck for Oil is Us, Inc. One day Gary was driving the truck 15 miles an hour above the speed limit. At the same time Lisa was driving a supply truck for a construction company. She too was driving 15 miles an hour above the speed limit. As a result of both of them speeding they collided and while Gary was not injured because he was wearing a fireproof suit when the oil truck exploded Linda sustained significant injuries. The jury found that Gary’s negligence was 60% responsible and Linda’s 40%. Total damages were set at $200,000. Which of the following is a potential outcome
Gary could collect $80,000 from Linda
Linda could collect $120,000 from Oil is Us, Inc
Linda could collect $200,000 from Gary
Linda and Gary could collect $120,000 and $80,000, respectively, from Oils is Us., Inc
Things did not go smoothly at the South Park Stalmart when it opened at 7:00 a.m. The day after Thanksgiving. A large crowd waited outside the store because of the amazing sales prices available that day. Stalmart had a well-trained and well-staffed security force, but when the doors opened people did not follow instructions and rushed in. Also, many people on power scooters drove in. Kenny, a 5th grader at South Park Elementary School, entered the store shortly after the rush with his parents. Unfortunately, just as they walked through the door Kenny was trampled by several aggressive customers fighting over a new toy. The trampling sprained his ankle. Two security guards carefully brought Kenny safely away from the crowd and immediately called for an ambulance. Kenny’s parents accompanied them and helped keep Kenny calm.
 
Meanwhile, an employee in the electronics department demonstrated the use of a new drone product. The employee used a phone charger he modified to charge one of the drones and the drone became overcharged. The instructions stated clearly, in large letters, and in numerous places, to only use the charger provided with the drone. The drone was NOT defective. The drone flew higher than the employee expected and knocked over a display of Joe Forman grills. Each grill weighed 15 pounds. The store had carefully erected the display so that it could not be knocked over even if someone ran into it with a power scooter. Unfortunately, however, the blades from one of the drone’s rotors destroyed the metal straps which held the display in place. The display was next to the area where Kenny, the guards and Kenny’s parents were awaiting the ambulance. A grill fell on Kenny’s arm which was badly injured.
 
Under the above facts the aggressive customers are most likely liable for
Conversion
False Imprisonment.
Battery
Trespass to chattles
Things did not go smoothly at the South Park Stalmart when it opened at 7:00 a.m. The day after Thanksgiving. A large crowd waited outside the store because of the amazing sales prices available that day. Stalmart had a well-trained and well-staffed security force, but when the doors opened people did not follow instructions and rushed in. Also, many people on power scooters drove in. Kenny, a 5th grader at South Park Elementary School, entered the store shortly after the rush with his parents. Unfortunately, just as they walked through the door Kenny was trampled by several aggressive customers fighting over a new toy. The trampling sprained his ankle. Two security guards carefully brought Kenny safely away from the crowd and immediately called for an ambulance. Kenny’s parents accompanied them and helped keep Kenny calm.
 
Meanwhile, an employee in the electronics department demonstrated the use of a new drone product. The employee used a phone charger he modified to charge one of the drones and the drone became overcharged. The instructions stated clearly, in large letters, and in numerous places, to only use the charger provided with the drone. The drone was NOT defective. The drone flew higher than the employee expected and knocked over a display of Joe Forman grills. Each grill weighed 15 pounds. The store had carefully erected the display so that it could not be knocked over even if someone ran into it with a power scooter. Unfortunately, however, the blades from one of the drone’s rotors destroyed the metal straps which held the display in place. The display was next to the area where Kenny, the guards and Kenny’s parents were awaiting the ambulance. A grill fell on Kenny’s arm which was badly injured.
 
Under the above facts Stalmart is most likely liable for
Any injury caused by the drone
Any injury that happens to a customer in their store
Any injury that happens to anyone in their store.
All of the above
Both A. and B
Stalmart is sued by Kenny’s family for the acts of the aggressive customers and the falling grills. Stalmart argues that it is not liable for the acts of the aggressive customers. Stalmart’s best argument on that issue is
Aggressive customers are not foreseeable on Black Friday
Stalmart had well trained security staff on duty, and they acted reasonably under the circumstances
Stalmart cannot be held responsible for the torts of customers on Black Friday
Stalmart cannot be held liable for any actions taken by its customers
All of the above
None of the above
Kenny can collect which of the following damages from the customers who injured him
Damages for any harm caused by their actions
Only punitive damages
Damages only for the value of the toys Kenny was hoping to buy at Stalmart
Only nominal damages
Both A. and C
Assume Stalmart guards told the customers to stop when they began to rush through the doors but didn’t take other actions to stop the customers. Michelle is injured when unidentified customers knocked her over. She sues Stalmart
Stalmart could be liable because she was an invitee
Stalmart could be liable because she is a licensee
Stalmart is liable because the customers who bumped into Michelle were trespassers
Stalmart could be liable for negligence
Assume the drone cut the straps when the operator lost control of the signal due to a Gamma Ray burst from a passing alien spaceship using Gamma Ray propulsion
The aliens are liable under the ancient common law rule of alien liability
Stalmart is still liable.
Stalmart is not liable, but the employee is
Both B. and C.
None of the above
{"name":"Torts Practice questions", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"Test your knowledge of tort law with our engaging practice quiz! This quiz will cover a variety of scenarios that involved different torts, helping you understand the complexities of law and legal responsibility.Whether you are a student preparing for exams or just someone interested in learning more about tort law, this quiz is perfect for you. Topics include:Intentional TortsNegligenceLiabilityDefensesDamages","img":"https:/images/course8.png"}
Powered by: Quiz Maker