<div> <div style="padding-bottom: 5px;"> </div> <span style="font-size: 18pt;"><img class="img-auto" style="min-width: 100px; display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="//cdn.poll-maker.com/44-1456124/4h-canada-bc-rev-white--use-this-one.png" alt="4H-Canada_BC_Rev-White,-use-this-one" width="180" height="199" /><strong>Llama Judging Beginner</strong></span></div> | Take the Quiz


Nose
Jaw
Throat
Poll


Neck
Shoulders
Withers
Chest


Back
Hip
Tail
Thigh


Thigh
Knee
Pastern
Toe


I placed this class of yearling male llamas 1-2-3-4	1 2 3 4 5 6
I placed 1 over 2 because 1 was more proportionate throughout the body, with a straighter topline. 1 moved out straighter and smoother than 2. 1 also had more consistent fibre than 2. I grant that 2 had more correctly banana shaped ers, however, 2 was smaller and lacked the presence of 1.	1 2 3 4 5 6
I placed2 over 3because 2 had more overall conditioning than 3 and a more correct tail set. 2 was broader in chest and stood more correctly on feet and legs than 3. I fault 3 because he was knock kneed and was suggish in his movement.	1 2 3 4 5 6
I placed 3 over 4 because 3 stood on a greater substance of boneand moved out straigher and more evenly than 4. I grant that 4 was more alert and regal than 3.	1 2 3 4 5 6
I placed I placed 4 last because he was sickle hocked and would swing out in the back end when he moved. His topline was uneven and he was low on his withers.	1 2 3 4 5 6
For these reasons I placed this class of yearling male llamas 1-2-3-4.	1 2 3 4 5 6

I placed 1 over 2 because 1 was more proportionate throughout the body, with a straighter topline. 1 moved out straighter and smoother than 2. 1 also had more consistent fibre than 2. I grant that 2 had more correctly banana shaped ers, however, 2 was smaller and lacked the presence of 1.

More Quizzes