Unlock hundreds more features
Save your Quiz to the Dashboard
View and Export Results
Use AI to Create Quizzes and Analyse Results

Sign inSign in with Facebook
Sign inSign in with Google

Put Your Behavior Therapy Knowledge to the Test

Ready to ace this behavior modification quiz? Challenge your mastery of extinction, reinforcement, and punishment

Difficulty: Moderate
2-5mins
Learning OutcomesCheat Sheet
Paper art illustration of behavior modification quiz on extinction reinforcement and punishing consequences coral background

Use this behavior therapy quiz to figure out when a consequence can be a punisher and when it is not. Practice extinction and reinforcement cases, spot common traps, and get more operant conditioning practice so you can check gaps before class or an exam.

What is a punisher in behavior analysis?
A stimulus that decreases the future frequency of a behavior
A stimulus that follows behavior but has no effect on it
A stimulus that increases the future frequency of a behavior
A stimulus presented before the behavior occurs
In behavior analysis, punishment refers to any consequence that decreases the future occurrence of the behavior it follows. A punisher is the specific event or stimulus that, when contingent on a response, suppresses that response. It is distinct from reinforcement, which increases behavior.
What is positive punishment?
Presentation of a pleasant stimulus to increase behavior
Removal of an aversive stimulus to increase behavior
Presentation of an aversive stimulus to decrease behavior
Removal of a desired stimulus to decrease behavior
Positive punishment involves presenting or adding an aversive stimulus immediately following a response, which reduces the likelihood of that response in the future. The term 'positive' refers to the addition of a stimulus, not to its value. This is contrasted with negative punishment, which removes a desired stimulus.
What is negative reinforcement?
Presentation of a reinforcer to increase behavior
Presentation of an aversive stimulus after a response
Removal of a desired stimulus to decrease behavior
Removal of an aversive stimulus to increase behavior
Negative reinforcement occurs when the removal of an aversive stimulus contingent on a response increases the future probability of that response. The term 'negative' refers to subtraction of a stimulus, not to the valence of the effect. It strengthens behavior by escape or avoidance of unpleasant events.
What is extinction in behavior analysis?
Presentation of a reinforcer to maintain behavior
Presentation of a punisher to eliminate a behavior
Removal of reinforcement leading to a decrease in behavior
Removal of an aversive stimulus to increase behavior
Extinction is the process by which a previously reinforced behavior is weakened by discontinuing reinforcement. When the reinforcer is withheld following the response, the behavior's rate declines. Extinction is not punishment but a withdrawal of reinforcement.
Which is an example of positive reinforcement?
Taking away video games for misbehavior
Ignoring a tantrum until it stops
Assigning additional chores after bad behavior
Giving a child candy for doing chores
Positive reinforcement involves presenting a desirable stimulus following a target behavior, increasing its future likelihood. In this example, candy is presented contingent on completing chores. This follows the classical definition of adding a reinforcer to strengthen behavior.
Which is an example of negative punishment?
Presenting loud noise until behavior stops
Providing extra candies for good grades
Giving a child time?out after misbehavior
Removing a toy after the child hits a sibling
Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus contingent on a response, resulting in a decrease in that response. Removing a toy after hitting is removal of a positive stimulus to reduce behavior. Time?out is also negative punishment but was not the correct example here.
Which is an unconditioned punisher?
Electric shock following an undesired response
Money taken away for bad grades
Verbal reprimand with no aversive history
A warning tone previously paired with shock
Unconditioned punishers are stimuli that are inherently aversive without prior learning, such as pain or electric shock. They decrease behavior by their mere presentation after a response. Conditioned punishers acquire aversive properties through pairing.
Which is a conditioned punisher?
Food deprivation
Cold water spray without any history
Loud noise that naturally startles
Verbal reprimand previously paired with timeout
A conditioned punisher acquires its punishing effect through pairing with an unconditioned punisher or other punishers. A verbal reprimand initially neutral can become aversive if followed by timeout repeatedly. This learned aversiveness suppresses behavior.
If a child receives extra chores after a tantrum and the tantrums decrease, this consequence is an example of what?
Extinction
Positive reinforcement
Negative punishment
Positive punishment
Extra chores are an aversive task added contingent on the tantrum, reducing its future occurrence. This addition of an aversive stimulus to suppress behavior is positive punishment. It contrasts with negative punishment, which involves removal of a positive stimulus.
Removing television privileges after misbehavior is an example of:
Negative punishment
Negative reinforcement
Extinction
Positive punishment
Negative punishment involves taking away a valued stimulus, such as TV, to reduce a target behavior. The removal of a positive reinforcer following the undesired behavior decreases its future frequency. This is distinct from extinction, which withdraws contingent reinforcement.
A worker is allowed a break after completing disliked tasks, which increases productivity. This is an example of:
Positive punishment
Negative reinforcement
Negative punishment
Positive reinforcement
The removal of an aversive condition (disliked tasks) contingent on task completion increases future productivity. This removal is negative reinforcement because escape from work is reinforcing. It differs from positive reinforcement, which adds a stimulus.
An aversive noise stops only when a lever is pressed. The lever press is being maintained by:
Escape extinction
Negative punishment
Positive punishment
Negative reinforcement
When the behavior (lever press) terminates an aversive stimulus, the relief reinforces the response. This escape behavior is maintained by negative reinforcement. In contrast, escape extinction would involve discontinuing the removal of the aversive stimulus.
A teacher stops praising a student to reduce excessive attention-seeking. This procedure is best described as:
Positive punishment
Negative punishment
Extinction
Time?out
Extinction involves withholding a previously delivered reinforcer - in this case, social praise - to reduce the occurrence of attention-seeking. No aversive event is presented or removed; rather, reinforcement is simply discontinued. Time?out and punishment involve added or removed stimuli differently.
Giving a child candy to stop them from crying is an example of:
Positive punishment
Negative punishment
Negative reinforcement
Positive reinforcement
Giving candy removes the aversive crying state, which increases the likelihood that the child will cry again to obtain candy. The removal of an aversive condition contingent on a response is negative reinforcement. It is not punishment, as the behavior is strengthened.
A dog's fetching behavior stops after the owner no longer gives treats. This change illustrates:
Negative reinforcement
Positive punishment
Extinction
Punishment
When the treats (reinforcer) are withheld after the fetch response, the behavior gradually decreases - a process called extinction. There is no addition of an aversive stimulus, so it is not punishment. Extinction simply discontinues the reinforcement contingency.
A child is placed in time?out for hitting, but the hitting actually increases in frequency. This outcome is likely due to:
Response maintenance
Behavioral contrast
Misapplication of the time?out procedure
Schedule thinning
If hitting increases despite time?out, the procedure may be misapplied - perhaps the time?out was too brief or inadvertently reinforced. Proper implementation requires clear boundaries and consistent contingencies. Misapplication can inadvertently strengthen the behavior.
In Sidman avoidance, shocks occur unless a response is made. The shock functions as:
Positive reinforcement
A conditioned punisher
An unconditioned punisher
Negative reinforcement
Shock is inherently aversive without prior conditioning, classifying it as an unconditioned punisher. In Sidman avoidance, responding postpones shock, demonstrating negative reinforcement. The shock itself suppresses responses if it occurs.
Under what condition is a stimulus considered a punisher?
It decreases the frequency of behavior when presented or removed contingently
It is unpleasant regardless of contingency
It follows behavior but has no effect
It increases future behavior
A punisher must functionally reduce the target behavior's future rate when presented or withdrawn contingent on that behavior. Mere unpleasantness does not suffice unless it reliably decreases the behavior. Contingency and functional effect are key criteria.
Which statement best distinguishes negative punishment from extinction?
Negative punishment adds an aversive stimulus
Negative punishment never affects behavior
Both remove a positive reinforcer, but extinction also removes all reinforcement
Extinction presents a punisher after behavior
Negative punishment removes a specific positive reinforcer contingent on behavior. Extinction withdraws the maintaining reinforcer for every instance of the behavior, not just one stimulus. Extinction is a broader withdrawal of reinforcement.
What is a conditioned generalized punisher?
A primary punisher like pain
A reinforcer paired with punishers
A stimulus paired with many reinforcers that can punish a variety of behaviors
A stimulus used only in negative reinforcement
A conditioned generalized punisher is a learned punisher that has been paired with multiple unconditioned or conditioned punishers. Because of these pairings, it can suppress a wide range of behaviors. Money loss often serves as a generalized punisher after pairing with various aversive events.
Which statement accurately describes response cost?
It involves removal of a specified reinforcer contingent on behavior
It is the same as negative reinforcement
It adds an aversive stimulus after behavior
It always removes conditioned reinforcers
Response cost is a form of negative punishment where a specific reinforcer is removed in response to undesired behavior. This decreases the likelihood of that behavior. It differs from generalized punishment in its specificity.
What is an extinction burst?
Gradual decrease in behavior from the start
Immediate stabilization of responding
Emergence of novel behaviors only
An initial increase in response rate when reinforcement is withdrawn
An extinction burst is a temporary increase in the frequency, duration, or intensity of the extinguished behavior upon removal of reinforcement. It often precedes the eventual decline in responding. Understanding this helps practitioners prepare for initial surge.
Why must a punisher be both contingent on and functionally related to a behavior to be effective?
Contingency ensures temporal contiguity but function has no role
Contingency ensures the punisher reliably follows behavior and function confirms it suppresses that behavior
Any aversive event is sufficient regardless of contingency
Punisher effectiveness is based only on intensity
For a punisher to reduce behavior consistently, it must occur only when the target behavior occurs (contingency) and must actually decrease the behavior (functional relation). Without contingency, the link is unclear; without functional effectiveness, behavior won't change. This principle underlies effective behavior intervention.
How does temporal suppression differ from long-term suppression when using punishment?
Temporal suppression is immediate but behavior often recovers, whereas long-term suppression endures
Long-term suppression always increases behavior over time
Both only produce short-term effects
Temporal suppression strengthens behavior
Temporal suppression refers to the immediate but transient reduction in behavior during or right after punishment. Long-term suppression indicates that the behavior remains reduced even after the punisher is withdrawn. Effective punishment aims for durable change, not just momentary suppression.
In overcorrection procedures, which component functions as the punishing contingency?
Restitutional and positive practice requirements that demand effort and time
Providing reinforcement for correct alternatives
Delivering continuous reinforcement after the behavior
Ignoring the problem behavior completely
Overcorrection involves requiring the individual to correct the environmental consequences of their misbehavior (restitutional) and then repeatedly practice the appropriate behavior (positive practice). These added requirements act as punishers by making the behavior more effortful. The added effort decreases future occurrences.
0
{"name":"What is a punisher in behavior analysis?", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"What is a punisher in behavior analysis?, What is positive punishment?, What is negative reinforcement?","img":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/3012/images/ogquiz.png"}

Study Outcomes

  1. Define Punishing Consequences -

    Outline the conditions under which a consequence qualifies as a punisher, drawing on the "a consequence can be considered a punisher if the" framework.

  2. Differentiate Reinforcement from Punishment -

    Compare positive and negative contingencies to accurately distinguish reinforcers from punishers in a punishment vs reinforcement quiz context.

  3. Apply Extinction and Reinforcement Principles -

    Use insights from the extinction and reinforcement test to predict behavioral outcomes when rewards or consequences are removed or introduced.

  4. Analyze Operant Conditioning Scenarios -

    Examine real-world and theoretical examples through operant conditioning questions to classify outcomes and forecast behavioral changes.

  5. Strengthen Behavior Modification Techniques -

    Integrate knowledge gained from this behavior modification quiz to design effective intervention strategies and enhance therapeutic outcomes.

Cheat Sheet

  1. Definition of a Punisher -

    A consequence can be considered a punisher if it reduces the future likelihood of the behavior it follows, according to Skinner's operant conditioning model. Use the mnemonic RIP (Reinforcement Increases, Punishment decreases) to recall this contrast. This clear distinction is essential when tackling punishment vs reinforcement quiz items.

  2. Positive vs. Negative Punishment -

    Positive punishment introduces an aversive event (e.g., a time-out buzzer) and negative punishment takes away a valued item (e.g., removing game privileges) to reduce behavior. Remember "Present vs. Pull-away" as you work through punishment vs reinforcement quiz items. These two forms often appear side by side in a behavior modification quiz and in extinction and reinforcement test items.

  3. Extinction vs. Punishment -

    Extinction involves withholding reinforcement until the behavior decreases, without adding aversive stimuli, unlike punishment. A handy trick: "Ignor-E (Extinction) rather than Injure (Punishment)" to recall this difference in operant conditioning questions. Extinction bursts may temporarily increase the behavior before it subsides, a phenomenon often featured in extinction and reinforcement test questions.

  4. Key Variables for Effective Punishment -

    For a consequence to function as a punisher, it must follow behavior with high immediacy, sufficient intensity, and consistent contingency, as research in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis suggests. Use the "3 I's" mnemonic (Immediacy, Intensity, and Consistency) to ace your operant conditioning questions. Weak or delayed punishers often lose effectiveness, a detail frequently tested in a punishment vs reinforcement quiz.

  5. Balancing Punishment with Reinforcement -

    While punishers can suppress unwanted behavior, they may also trigger aggression or fear, so always pair them with positive reinforcement, per APA guidelines. A simple rule: "Punish sparingly, reinforce generously" to balance strategies in your behavior modification quiz. Observers often confuse this balance in extinction and reinforcement test items, so stay alert to mixed schedules.

Powered by: Quiz Maker