Unlock hundreds more features
Save your Quiz to the Dashboard
View and Export Results
Use AI to Create Quizzes and Analyse Results

OR
Sign inSign in with Facebook
Sign inSign in with Google
Quizzes > Personality & Relationships

Machiavellianism Test: What's Your Strategic Style?

Quick, free quiz to discover your type. Instant results from the Mach IV test.

Editorial: Review CompletedCreated By: Mayda PtriUpdated Aug 28, 2025
2-5mins
Profiles
Paper art illustration for Machiavellianism personality test on dark blue background

This Machiavellianism test helps you see how you use strategy, trust, and influence, and gives you an instant Mach IV score. For a broader picture of darker traits, take the dark triad test. If you're curious about your tactics in everyday life, try a quick manipulation test, or explore how your habits come across with a difficult person test.

A sponsor grows indecisive two weeks before launch. What is your first move?
Run contingency plans and present two low-risk paths with decision trees.
Reframe the narrative to their priorities and rebuild confidence with a tailored message.
Pause, re-read the context, and adjust the plan based on shifting incentives.
Hold a candid alignment chat to surface fears and re-commit to shared goals.
undefined
You hear a rumor that could give your team an edge. How do you handle it?
Quietly verify and, if solid, exploit timing to outmaneuver competitors.
Use the rumor to craft a low-friction nudge that guides stakeholders your way without calling it out.
Hold action until context is clearer; switch tactics depending on confirmation quality.
Decline to use it until facts are confirmed and sources can be made transparent.
undefined
In a negotiation, the other side anchors high. What is your instinctive response?
Counter with data-backed scenarios and walk-away thresholds you prepared earlier.
Reshape the frame: highlight shared wins, re-anchor with benefits they value most.
Probe the context; if collaborative, go open-book, if not, hedge and adapt midstream.
Name the tactic, restate fair terms, and seek a principled agreement standard.
undefined
Two teammates argue over credit. What do you do first?
Map incentives and propose a split that optimizes future cooperation and output.
Reframe the win so both see status preserved; broker language that lets each feel valued.
Assess the environment: if zero-sum, contain; if collaborative, co-create acknowledgment norms.
Facilitate a transparent conversation focused on facts, fairness, and shared outcomes.
undefined
You inherit a messy stakeholder map. How do you chart influence?
Build a power-interest grid and identify leverage points and contingencies.
List rapport doors and craft tailored appeals for each persona.
Map context volatility and choose an adaptive engagement cadence by quadrant.
Surface shared values and create open forums to align on transparent goals.
undefined
It is your first week in a volatile org. What is your operating stance?
Quiet observation, network mapping, and low-visibility tests of influence pathways.
Quick wins through well-timed favors and messages that echo local language.
Sense and respond: keep options open, commit only as clarity improves.
Request transparent norms and set expectations for respectful collaboration early.
undefined
You must secure budget under strict scrutiny. What is your approach?
Present a phased ROI model with risk buffers and kill-switch criteria.
Tell a compelling value story tied to the sponsor's personal wins and timing.
Offer modular options so stakeholders can adapt commitment as context shifts.
Use transparent benchmarks and invite oversight to build trust in the spend.
undefined
A critic calls you out publicly. What is your move?
Stay calm, gather facts, and respond with a measured, evidence-based plan forward.
Acknowledge feelings, reframe the debate, and win the audience with tone and timing.
Read the crowd; de-escalate or go private depending on the heat and stakes.
Own mistakes, state facts plainly, and invite a constructive path without spin.
undefined
Designing pilot metrics, what do you prioritize?
Leading indicators, control groups, and clear decision thresholds.
Signals that resonate with sponsors and make wins easy to recognize socially.
Flexible dashboards that shift with context and stakeholder learning needs.
Open, understandable measures that teams can trust and discuss openly.
undefined
A deadline looms and your team is stressed. How do you delegate?
Assign by comparative advantage and build a fallback tree for critical tasks.
Pair tasks with morale boosts and micro-acknowledgments to keep momentum soft but steady.
Shift roles dynamically as bottlenecks appear to maintain flow efficiency.
Co-create a clear plan with transparent commitments and mutual support norms.
undefined
A competitor makes a move you did not expect. Your next step?
Run fast scenario analysis and adjust positioning to exploit second-order effects.
Shape perception: communicate advantages of your direction with finesse and timing.
Pause and sample more signals; pivot only as the landscape truly shifts.
Inform stakeholders openly, align on facts, and choose a principled response together.
undefined
You are pitching a risky idea. How do you reduce perceived risk?
Stage-gate the plan with quantified downside controls and exit points.
Tell a story that links to identity, timing the ask when enthusiasm peaks.
Offer parallel paths and invite input to adapt the route as learning emerges.
Be transparent about risks and fairness in who bears them, then share decisions openly.
undefined
A friend at a partner company asks for non-public info. What do you do?
Decline and log the interaction; keep leverage for later, without burning bridges.
Deflect gracefully, offering harmless insights that preserve rapport but reveal nothing material.
Check context and policy; if appropriate, share only what is allowed and useful now.
State boundaries clearly and explain why transparency and trust matter to the partnership.
undefined
Your mentoring style most often looks like what?
Teaching structured thinking, decision trees, and risk-aware planning.
Coaching presence, timing, and persuasive communication craft.
Helping others read context and pivot methods without losing integrity.
Modeling candid feedback, consent, and fair process as performance drivers.
undefined
You are setting a meeting agenda with diverse stakeholders. What anchors it?
Decisions required, scenarios prepared, and pre-read analysis to streamline choices.
Story arc, key emotional beats, and audience-specific framing to build buy-in.
Decision gates that can flex based on updated information during the session.
Ground rules for respectful dialogue, clear roles, and transparent outcomes.
undefined
A tactic you tried backfired. How do you recover?
Debrief privately, adjust the plan, and shift moves with minimal noise.
Acknowledge the miss publicly with poise, reset expectations, and reframe momentum.
Reassess the environment; if norms shifted, choose a new playbook fast.
Be transparent about lessons learned and invite input to rebuild trust and process.
undefined
You must onboard a skeptical expert. What is your opening move?
Show the roadmap, dependencies, and where their expertise is pivotal to success.
Praise their strengths, mirror their language, and make a well-timed ask for small help first.
Ask context questions to learn constraints, then adapt your plan to fit their reality.
Be clear about expectations, decision rights, and norms of respectful debate.
undefined
Cross-cultural deal, uncertain etiquette. How do you proceed?
Prepare a strategic brief with red lines, fallback options, and interpreters for key steps.
Lean on relationship-building rituals, observe closely, and match tempo with grace.
Start neutral, learn norms fast, and adjust tactics as trust and clarity evolve.
Name intentions openly, confirm shared principles, and set mutual-respect boundaries.
undefined
Your boss hints at a shortcut that skirts policy. What is your reaction?
Suggest a compliant path that still achieves the objective, with tradeoffs mapped.
Deflect with tact, propose a face-saving alternative, and preserve rapport.
Ask clarifying questions; if risk is high, recalibrate the approach or escalate appropriately.
State your boundary and why fairness and compliance matter, then offer ethical options.
undefined
Crisis communications: a system outage hits customers. What do you prioritize?
Stabilization plan, incident tiers, and clear owner-by-owner action trees.
Empathetic messaging cadence that maintains trust while updates roll out.
Adaptive channels and thresholds that adjust as scope and severity evolve.
Transparent facts, ownership of impact, and clear restitution commitments.
undefined
Your team requests decision autonomy. How do you respond?
Define guardrails, decision rights, and escalation paths with measurable signals.
Empower them publicly, celebrate wins, and nudge norms through recognition.
Pilot autonomy in phases and adapt scope as capabilities and context mature.
Co-create a transparent charter that aligns autonomy with shared values and trust.
undefined
A partner reneges on a promise. What do you do first?
Review contract levers and prepare a path that restores advantage with minimal fallout.
Approach them privately with face-preserving language to reopen their commitment window.
Diagnose whether incentives shifted; renegotiate terms suited to the new terrain.
Address it openly, name the impact, and request a fair remedy with transparent steps.
undefined
There is a chance to cut corners for a quick market lead. Your view?
Only if risk is bounded and reversible; design safeguards and exit ramps first.
Prefer a perception play to gain momentum without eroding trust or breaking rules.
It depends on norms and stakes; adapt speed with guardrails as context allows.
Decline shortcuts that trade integrity for speed; choose durable trust instead.
undefined
You must decide who gets a stretch assignment. How do you choose?
Pick the person whose growth maximizes future optionality for the team plan.
Select the one with stakeholder goodwill to ensure smoother adoption and support.
Rotate based on context fit and learning goals for current environment needs.
Choose transparently with clear criteria and provide equitable support to succeed.
undefined
A senior leader wants results but with minimal visibility. Your play?
Operate with quiet milestones, reporting via secure channels and contingency buffers.
Build subtle consensus and make the outcome feel like a natural evolution, not a push.
Keep options open until the visibility constraint eases, then accelerate publicly.
Clarify ethical limits and ensure that low visibility does not compromise fairness or consent.
undefined
You are designing a feedback system. What principle guides you most?
Actionability with trend analysis and closed-loop remediation steps.
Psychological safety through tone, timing, and face-saving phrasing.
Adaptivity so that inputs change weight as contexts and goals shift.
Transparency in criteria and fair process to build trust in outcomes.
undefined
A client requests a bespoke feature with low ROI. Your reaction?
Offer a configurable alternative that fits roadmap leverage and reduces risk.
Recast the value story to steer them toward higher-impact options they will like.
Explore the why; if context demands, time-box a pilot and revisit after learning.
Be candid about tradeoffs and align on a fair choice that respects both sides.
undefined
Your default approach to risk is best described how?
Quantify it, hedge it, and design reversible moves.
Shape perception so risk feels smaller through trust and timing.
Let context set appetite; flex exposure as information changes.
Share risks openly and ensure they are fairly distributed and consented to.
undefined
When conflict arises, you usually try what first?
Find the hidden lever or trade that unlocks movement.
Lower the temperature and use language that saves face for everyone.
Check whether the context calls for openness or guardedness, then proceed accordingly.
Put facts on the table, speak plainly, and commit to a fair process.
undefined
Trust and clarity reduce rework and accelerate teams.
True
False
undefined
0

Profiles

These profiles decode your Machiavellianism test results, revealing where you land on the Mach IV test spectrum. From principled strategist to Machiavellian mastermind, discover your defining traits and a quick tip to harness your style responsibly.
  1. The Principled Diplomat -

    Scoring low on the Mach IV test, you value honesty, transparency, and mutual respect. You influence through genuine connection rather than manipulation. Tip: Use your integrity to foster trust and lead with empathy.

  2. The Tactical Negotiator -

    With a modest Machiavellian personality test score, you blend strategic thinking with ethical considerations. You excel at compromise, charm, and building alliances. Tip: Leverage your diplomacy to secure win-win outcomes in any negotiation.

  3. The Calculated Operator -

    Your Machiavellianism test places you above average in strategic planning and subtle influence. You're goal-oriented and skilled at anticipating others' moves. Tip: Channel your tactics responsibly to achieve objectives without burning bridges.

  4. The Strategic Architect -

    A high Mach IV test score marks you as a master planner and persuasive communicator. You construct elaborate strategies and rarely reveal your full hand. Tip: Stay mindful of ethical boundaries to maintain credibility and respect.

  5. The Machiavellian Mastermind -

    Your exceptional Mach IV test result indicates a top-tier manipulator with laser focus on power and control. You see every interaction as a game to win. Tip: Balance your ambition with empathy to avoid isolation and foster sustainable success.

Make a Quiz (FREE) Copy & Edit This Quiz Create a Quiz with AI

Personality Quizzes

Powered by: Quiz Maker