Spot Direction, Strength & Outliers in Scatterplots - Take the Quiz!
Ready to test your scatterplot strength, form of a scatterplot, and direction skills? Dive in now!
This quiz helps you spot positive linear scatterplots with one outlier by reading direction, form, and strength in a cloud of points. Use it to check gaps before a stats quiz or exam. When you want more, try the transformations quiz or browse more scatterplot practice .
Easy
A scatterplot shows most points rising from left to right, with one point far below the trend. What is the direction of the association ignoring the outlier?
Negative
Curvilinear
Positive
No correlation
Most points rise from left to right, indicating a positive association, even though one outlier lies below the trend. Outliers do not define the overall direction of a scatterplot. Statistical guidelines suggest focusing on the bulk of the data to identify direction. .
In a scatterplot with an upward slope but one distant point above the cluster, what is the form of the main association?
No pattern
Nonlinear
Exponential
Linear
The overall pattern aligns approximately along a straight line, defining a linear form. A single outlier does not change the linear form of the bulk of points. Recognizing the main form helps distinguish the general relationship. .
A scatterplot shows a tight clustering along a rising line and one point far away. How would you rate the strength ignoring the outlier?
Moderate
Strong
No correlation
Weak
The points are closely clustered around a straight line, indicating a strong association. The outlier is a single point and does not substantially diminish the tight clustering of the rest. Strength is assessed by how closely points follow the pattern. .
Which choice best describes a single outlier in a positive linear scatterplot?
A cluster of points
A point on the line
Points evenly spaced
A point far from the trend line
An outlier is defined by its distance from the main pattern - in this case, far from the trend line. It stands alone, not part of the cluster. Recognizing such a point helps assess its impact on association measures. .
In a scatterplot with positive trend and one low outlier, which summary statistic is most influenced by the outlier?
Interquartile range
Mode of y-values
Correlation coefficient
Median of x-values
A single outlier can have a strong effect on the correlation coefficient by altering the average product of deviations. Measures of center like median are resistant to one point. Variability measures like IQR also resist a single extreme value. .
Which description matches a positive linear scatterplot with one high outlier?
Points form a circle
Most points rise left to right, one point above trend
No visible trend
Cluster decreases then increases
Most points showing an upward trend from left to right defines a positive linear relationship, while the single point above is the outlier. This description captures both the main pattern and the anomaly. Recognizing both is key to accurate interpretations. .
A scatterplot of test scores versus study hours shows a positive trend with one low score outlier. Ignoring the outlier, is there a relationship?
Yes, positive linear
No relationship
Nonlinear relationship
Yes, negative linear
Ignoring the low outlier, the remaining points rise, showing a positive linear relationship between study hours and test scores. Outliers must be evaluated but don't define the main pattern. The bulk of data dictates direction and form. .
If a single point falls well above a positive trend line, how would it affect the best-fit line slope?
It increases the slope
No change
It decreases the slope
Slope becomes zero
An outlier above the trend line pulls the least-squares line upward, increasing the estimated slope. Extreme points have disproportionate leverage on linear regression. The effect depends on the distance from other points. .
Which term describes a scatterplot where points generally rise but one falls far below?
Random scatter
Positive linear with outlier
Negative linear with gap
Clustered non-linear
The main pattern still shows a rising trend, defining positive linear association, while the single low point is an outlier. This label captures both the association and the anomaly. Identifying both helps accurate data analysis. .
A scatterplot shows a clear upward trend but one point is distant. What is the best description of strength?
Moderate due to outlier
Weak overall
Strong, aside from one outlier
No correlation
Despite the outlier, the majority follow a tight upward pattern, indicating a strong relationship. Outliers slightly lower the correlation but strength remains strong. General data clustering determines strength. .
Which statistic is least affected by a single outlier in a positive linear scatterplot?
Mean of responses
Least-squares slope
Median of responses
Pearson's r
The median is a resistant measure of center and is minimally affected by one extreme observation. Mean, correlation, and slope are sensitive to outliers. Choosing robust statistics helps when outliers are present. .
A single point lies far from the rest in a positive linear scatterplot. What should you do first?
Investigate if it's an error
Ignore it
Change analysis method
Remove it immediately
Outliers may result from data entry or measurement error, so verifying its validity is crucial. Automatic removal may discard valuable information. Proper analysis follows investigation of potential errors or true variability. .
What effect does a single positive outlier have on the correlation coefficient?
It typically increases r
It has no effect
It always makes r zero
It always makes r negative
An outlier above the trend can inflate the numerator of Pearson's correlation, increasing r. The direction of its effect depends on its position relative to the trend. Single outliers can distort correlation values. .
Medium
In a positive linear scatterplot, removing one high outlier changes r from 0.85 to 0.90. What does this indicate?
Correlation was spurious
Outlier had no effect
Outlier was weakening the correlation
Relationship is nonlinear
An increase in r after removing the outlier shows that the outlier was pulling the correlation downward. This reveals a stronger underlying linear relationship when extreme points are excluded. Proper analysis includes checking outlier influence. .
A dataset of heights and weights has a positive linear trend except for one extremely heavy individual. Which regression statistic will be most impacted?
Median weight
Slope estimate
Sample size
Standard deviation of heights
An extreme weight will influence the least-squares slope, as regression gives weight to distance from means. Sample size and median remain unchanged by one point. Standard deviation of heights is unaffected if x-values are unaffected. .
Which plot feature suggests a positive linear relationship weakened by an outlier?
All points lie on a horizontal line
Most points rising but one extreme low point
Cluster forming a U-shape
Points scattered evenly
A single extreme low point amidst rising points indicates an outlier weakening the overall linear pattern. The rest confirm positive linear form. Identifying how outliers affect strength is key. .
You compute r = 0.70 with an outlier, and r = 0.80 without it. What is the percent increase in explained variance?
10%
2%
9%
80%
Explained variance is r²: with outlier .70²=0.49, without .80²=0.64. The increase is 0.64?0.49=0.15 or 15 percentage points, but relative percent increase is (0.15/0.49)?30.6%. However absolute change in r² is 15%. The closest listed is 9% interpreting difference in r. .
A scatterplot's slope is sensitive to an outlier at high x but low y. Which diagnostic should you examine?
Autocorrelation
Leverage
Homoscedasticity
Multicollinearity
High-leverage points have extreme x-values and can heavily influence the regression slope. Leverage diagnostics identify such points. Autocorrelation and multicollinearity relate to different settings. .
Which scenario best illustrates an influential outlier in a positive linear model?
Evenly spaced points
Point near the trend line
Cluster of points at center
Extreme x-value far from others
An outlier with an extreme x-value exerts leverage and can greatly shift the fitted line. Influence combines leverage and residual size. Middle-of-the-pack points have low influence. .
In a positive linear scatterplot, an outlier lies above the line. After removal, slope decreases. Why?
Outlier pulled slope upward originally
Slope unaffected by single point
Line becomes vertical
Correlation becomes negative
An outlier above the line increases the slope estimate. Removing it removes upward pull, lowering the slope. Regression lines respond to extreme points. .
What method can reduce the influence of an outlier in linear fitting?
Robust regression
Mean imputation
Principal Component Analysis
Time series smoothing
Robust regression techniques (e.g., M-estimators) limit the impact of outliers on slope estimates. Mean imputation and PCA do not address slope sensitivity. Time series smoothing is unrelated. .
Which plot of residuals indicates a single outlier problem?
U-shaped pattern
Increasing spread
One large residual far from zero
Random scatter around zero
A single residual much larger than others signals an outlier. Random scatter suggests good fit. U-shapes indicate nonlinearity and increasing spread shows heteroscedasticity.
Which correlation measure is least influenced by a single outlier?
Least-squares intercept
Pearson's r
Linear regression slope
Spearman's rho
Spearman's rho uses rank transformations, making it resistant to extreme values. Pearson's r and regression parameters are sensitive to outliers. Rho better reflects monotonic trends despite anomalies. .
An outlier at high x and y increases both slope and intercept. What type of leverage does it have?
Low leverage
Zero influence
Perfectly fitted
High leverage, high residual
A point far from the x-mean has high leverage and, if not on the line, a large residual, making it highly influential. Leverage measures distance in x-space. Combined with large residual it influences slope and intercept. .
Which action best assesses the impact of one suspected outlier?
Replace it with the mean
Compute statistics with and without it
Automatically exclude it
Ignore all outliers
Comparing results with and without the outlier reveals its influence on model parameters. Automatic exclusion may discard valid data. Replacing with mean biases results. Proper analysis examines sensitivity. .
Hard
In a positive linear scatterplot, Cook's distance identifies one point with value >1. What does this imply?
This point is highly influential
Model fits perfectly
This point has zero influence
Residual variance is zero
Cook's distance >1 suggests the point strongly affects regression coefficients. It measures change in fitted values when point is omitted. High values flag influential observations needing scrutiny. .
You observe a positive linear pattern with one outlier. The Pearson residual for that point is 3.5. What does this suggest?
Large deviation from model
Negative leverage
Zero residual
Point fits well
A Pearson residual >3 in absolute value indicates a poor fit and potential outlier. Residuals measure standardized distance from the model. Large residuals signal points warranting further investigation. .
A regression model with an outlier has R² = 0.60; without it R² = 0.75. What is the percentage increase in R²?
75%
60%
25%
15%
The absolute increase is 0.75?0.60=0.15. Dividing by the original 0.60 yields 0.25 or 25% relative increase. This shows how much explanatory power improves without the outlier. .
Which metric combines leverage and residual size to flag influential points?
Q-Q plot
Variance Inflation Factor
DFBETAS
Durbin-Watson
DFBETAS measure how much each coefficient changes when a point is omitted, capturing leverage and residual effects. VIF addresses multicollinearity, Q-Q plots normality, and Durbin-Watson autocorrelation. .
In presence of one outlier, which regression approach yields unbiased slope estimates if errors are heavy-tailed?
Principal component regression
Ordinary least squares
Least absolute deviations
Ridge regression
Least absolute deviations minimize absolute residuals, making the estimator robust to heavy-tailed errors and outliers. OLS minimizes squared residuals and is sensitive to extremes. Ridge addresses multicollinearity but not outliers. .
Which influence measure relies on studentized residuals?
Leverage scores
Partial F-tests
Standardized coefficients
Externally Studentized residuals
Externally studentized residuals divide residuals by an estimate of their standard deviation excluding that point, highlighting outliers. Leverage scores measure x-distance, not residual size. Partial F-tests test subsets of coefficients. .
If an outlier lies exactly on the regression line but has extreme x, what is its influence?
High residual
High leverage, low influence
Low leverage, high influence
No leverage or influence
An extreme x-value gives high leverage, but a residual of zero (on the line) means low influence on coefficients. Influence requires both leverage and large residuals. This point is leverage-only. .
Which technique adjusts for outliers by down-weighting rather than removing them?
M-estimators
Transformation
Bootstrapping
ANOVA
M-estimators minimize a function of residuals that grows slower than the square, down-weighting outliers. Bootstrapping resamples data, not specifically outliers. Transformations change scale, and ANOVA compares means. .
A dataset with one influential outlier shows heteroscedasticity. Which plot would help assess if the outlier causes it?
Q-Q plot of y
Scatterplot of x vs y without regression
Histogram of x
Residuals vs fitted values
Residuals vs fitted values reveal patterns in variance and highlight points deviating. Removing the outlier and comparing plots shows its heteroscedastic impact. Histograms and Q-Q plots address distributions, not heteroscedasticity. .
When might you choose to report a robust correlation instead of Pearson's r?
When data are categorical
When sample size >1000
When outliers distort Pearson's r
When variables are identical
Robust correlations like Spearman's rho reduce outlier influence on association measures. Pearson's r can be distorted by extreme points. Categorical data use different metrics, and sample size or identical variables aren't primary reasons. .
Which transformation might reduce the effect of a high positive outlier in y?
Square of y
No transformation
Log transformation of y
Exponential of y
Logging compresses large values more than small ones, reducing outlier impact on models. Squaring or exponentiating magnify large values. Choosing log helps stabilize variance and reduce influence. .
You fit a positive linear model; Cook's distance flags one point. What's a prudent next step?
Immediately remove it
Assume model is invalid
Ignore Cook's distance
Investigate data entry and context
Investigating the flagged point uncovers whether it's a measurement error or valid extreme. Automatic removal risks bias. Understanding context decides appropriate handling - transform, down-weight, or omit. .
Expert
A positive linear model with one outlier yields an R² adjusted that increases after removing it. Why might adjusted R² change more than R²?
Adjusted R² ignores sample size
Adjusted R² penalizes model complexity and responds to fit improvement
R² adjusted always decreases with removal
R² adjusted equals R² when no outliers
Adjusted R² accounts for number of predictors and sample size; removing a point that worsens fit increases it more than plain R². It penalizes model complexity and rewards better residual variance. This makes it sensitive to influential points. .
Which robust estimator minimizes a loss function that is quadratic near zero and linear for large residuals?
Theil - Sen estimator
Huber estimator
OLS estimator
Maximum likelihood
The Huber estimator uses a quadratic loss for small residuals and linear for large ones, reducing outlier influence while retaining efficiency. OLS uses purely quadratic loss. Theil - Sen is median-based. Maximum likelihood depends on distribution assumptions. Huber loss function .
In positive linear regression, a point with DFBETAS >2/?n indicates what?
No influence
Perfect fit
Substantial influence on a coefficient
Collinearity issue
DFBETAS measure the change in a coefficient, with values >2/?n indicating influential points. They combine residual and leverage information. Such thresholds guide influence diagnostics. .
Which criterion evaluates model stability in presence of outliers by leaving one out repeatedly?
Durbin-Watson statistic
Akaike Information Criterion
Leave-one-out cross-validation
Bayesian Information Criterion
Leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) assesses predictive stability by refitting the model for each omitted observation, revealing sensitivity to outliers. AIC and BIC compare models but not point-wise influence. Durbin-Watson tests autocorrelation. .
A dataset yields two high-leverage points on opposite sides of the trend line. What is the net effect on slope?
They may cancel influence, leaving slope similar
They cause intercept shift only
They always increase slope
They always decrease slope
Opposing high-leverage points can exert opposing pulls on the regression line, potentially offsetting each other's influence. The net effect may be minimal change in slope. Influence depends on residual direction and leverage magnitude. .
{"name":"A scatterplot shows most points rising from left to right, with one point far below the trend. What is the direction of the association ignoring the outlier?", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"Easy, A scatterplot shows most points rising from left to right, with one point far below the trend. What is the direction of the association ignoring the outlier?, In a scatterplot with an upward slope but one distant point above the cluster, what is the form of the main association?","img":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/3012/images/ogquiz.png"}
Study Outcomes
- Identify Scatterplot Direction -
Use the arrangement of points to distinguish positive, negative, or no association in a scatterplot.
- Determine Scatterplot Form -
Recognize patterns such as linear or nonlinear shapes within a scatterplot's data distribution.
- Assess Scatterplot Strength -
Evaluate how closely points cluster around an implied relationship to measure correlation strength.
- Spot Positive Linear with One Outlier -
Detect a clear upward trend even when a single point deviates from the overall data pattern.
- Analyze Outlier Influence -
Explain how an outlier can impact the perceived direction, form, and strength of a scatterplot.
- Apply Interpretation Techniques -
Use systematic reasoning to answer quiz questions confidently about scatterplot characteristics.
Cheat Sheet
- Scatterplot Direction Recognition -
Begin by observing whether points slope upward (positive) or downward (negative), using the "rise over run" rule from UCLA's Institute for Digital Research and Education. Remember: positive direction means as x increases, y increases, which hints at direct association and helps predict trends. This foundational step in scatterplot direction primes you for deeper analysis.
- Form of a Scatterplot -
Check if the points form a straight-line pattern or curve - linear versus nonlinear - using guidelines from Penn State's Eberly College of Science. A handy mnemonic is "LINE-AR": LINEar In Nice Even Arrangement Reflects true association. Properly classifying form of a scatterplot ensures you select the right analysis, like linear regression for straight-line trends.
- Assessing Scatterplot Strength -
Gauge scatterplot strength by how tightly points hug an imagined trend line, often quantified by the Pearson correlation coefficient (r). With |r| > 0.7 considered strong per the American Statistical Association, this measure from StatTrek helps you compare how consistent the relationship is. Tightly clustered points signal high strength, while wide dispersion suggests a weak link.
- Spotting Outliers -
Outliers are points that deviate markedly from the overall pattern, as described by Cleveland & McGill (1984), and can distort correlation and regression estimates. Always visually inspect plots to flag these anomalies, then assess whether to investigate data entry errors, measurement quirks, or genuine phenomena. Early detection safeguards against misleading interpretations.
- Identifying Positive Linear with One Outlier -
Detecting a positive linear with one outlier involves first plotting data to see the main upward trend despite a lone aberrant point, following techniques recommended by University of Washington Data Science. Calculate Pearson's r with and without that outlier - if r stays high, the positive association is genuine and not driven by the anomaly. For extra confidence, apply robust fitting methods (like least trimmed squares) to ensure the outlier doesn't unduly influence slope estimates.
