TOEFL Experts Reading Practice 38

 
Reading Section
 
 
This section measures your ability to understand academic passages in English. You can skip questions and go back to them later as long as there is time remaining.
 
 
 
 
Now begin the Reading section.
 
Reading Section
 
 
This section measures your ability to understand academic passages in English. You can skip questions and go back to them later as long as there is time remaining.
 
 
 
 
Now begin the Reading section.
Southwestern Water Rights
 
desert-with-blue-sky

  Over the past century, the states of Utah, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, and California, forming the Southwestern United States, have experienced tremendous population growth. In the 1910 census, these five states accounted for less than 4 percent of the domestic population. In 2010, this figure was greater than 16 percent. Population growth in the Southwest continues to outstrip growth in the rest of the country, as the region receives positive net migration from other states as well as substantial immigration from foreign countries. Part of the appeal is the pleasant weather, with mild to hot temperatures all year, and low precipitation. However, therein lies the crux of a major problem—the ecosystems of the Southwest are not equipped to sustainably provide enough water for the increasing number of people that live there.

  All five Southwestern states rely greatly on external water sources, plus groundwater sources, which are large but finite. Per-capita water consumption is also higher than the national average for two reasons. First, these states have a drier climate, so more water is needed for the watering of lawns and gardens. Second, all five states have a substantial farming industry and are exporters of agricultural products domestically and abroad. These states therefore use much more water for irrigation per person than the rest of the United States.

  Water use has become much more efficient across the United States in recent decades. Since 1980, per-capita usage has fallen by about 40 percent. This decline is even more pronounced in the Southwest. However, it is counterbalanced by a comparable growth in population, such that the total amount of water being consumed annually in the Southwest is basically unchanged. This level of usage is not sustainable over the long term.

  The Southwestern states consumed a total of 61 million acre-feet1 of water in 2010. About 35 percent of this water comes from groundwater, and the rest comes from surface water, such as lakes and streams. Most of the groundwater being used is not fully replenished. In California alone, the net withdrawal of groundwater, after replenishment from precipitation and surface water, is currently around 10 million acre-feet per year. At this rate, California’s known usable groundwater supplies will be exhausted by the year 2060.

  For surface water, these five states are heavily reliant on various sources. California has ample native freshwater supplies in the northern and central portions of the state. Excluding California, however, over half of the freshwater needs of the Southwest are met from a single source: the Colorado River. This river originates in the Rocky Mountains and meanders through Utah and Arizona before forming the border of Arizona and Nevada, plus parts of the Arizona–California border. The river then continues into Mexico. 

  Allocation of rights to this water has been a political flash point among the Southwestern states since the original Colorado River Compact, drafted in 1922. According to the present version of the Compact, 15 million acre-feet per year are allocated to seven Western states, of which the five Southwestern states receive about 10 million—Wyoming and Colorado receive the rest. Mexico also has an annual allotment of 1.5 million acre-feet. The river is dammed at various places, with the Hoover Dam on the border of Arizona and Nevada, forming Lake Mead, being the most well-known.

  There are several problems with this allocation. First, the estimates for annual water flow in the Colorado River were based on a survey that occurred during a period of relatively heavy rainfall. It is unlikely that the Colorado River can continue to produce enough water to fill these allocations indefinitely. Evidence of this is seen by the water levels in Lake Mead, which are currently more than 150 feet below peak. Second, the agreement is a zero-sum game: any increase in allocation to one state must necessarily come at the expense of another. This puts pressure on high-growth states like Arizona and Nevada. Finally, there is the problem of the ongoing drought in the region. The drought puts pressure on all water sources, and the Colorado River is no exception. If the drought remains unabated, Lake Mead could eventually become unusable, and hydroelectric generating capacity in the Southwest could fall below minimum requirements as early as the year 2020.

Southwestern Water Rights
 
desert-with-blue-sky

  Over the past century, the states of Utah, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, and California, forming the Southwestern United States, have experienced tremendous population growth. In the 1910 census, these five states accounted for less than 4 percent of the domestic population. In 2010, this figure was greater than 16 percent. Population growth in the Southwest continues to outstrip growth in the rest of the country, as the region receives positive net migration from other states as well as substantial immigration from foreign countries. Part of the appeal is the pleasant weather, with mild to hot temperatures all year, and low precipitation. However, therein lies the crux of a major problem—the ecosystems of the Southwest are not equipped to sustainably provide enough water for the increasing number of people that live there.

  All five Southwestern states rely greatly on external water sources, plus groundwater sources, which are large but finite. Per-capita water consumption is also higher than the national average for two reasons. First, these states have a drier climate, so more water is needed for the watering of lawns and gardens. Second, all five states have a substantial farming industry and are exporters of agricultural products domestically and abroad. These states therefore use much more water for irrigation per person than the rest of the United States.

  Water use has become much more efficient across the United States in recent decades. Since 1980, per-capita usage has fallen by about 40 percent. This decline is even more pronounced in the Southwest. However, it is counterbalanced by a comparable growth in population, such that the total amount of water being consumed annually in the Southwest is basically unchanged. This level of usage is not sustainable over the long term.

  The Southwestern states consumed a total of 61 million acre-feet1 of water in 2010. About 35 percent of this water comes from groundwater, and the rest comes from surface water, such as lakes and streams. Most of the groundwater being used is not fully replenished. In California alone, the net withdrawal of groundwater, after replenishment from precipitation and surface water, is currently around 10 million acre-feet per year. At this rate, California’s known usable groundwater supplies will be exhausted by the year 2060.

  For surface water, these five states are heavily reliant on various sources. California has ample native freshwater supplies in the northern and central portions of the state. Excluding California, however, over half of the freshwater needs of the Southwest are met from a single source: the Colorado River. This river originates in the Rocky Mountains and meanders through Utah and Arizona before forming the border of Arizona and Nevada, plus parts of the Arizona–California border. The river then continues into Mexico. 

  Allocation of rights to this water has been a political flash point among the Southwestern states since the original Colorado River Compact, drafted in 1922. According to the present version of the Compact, 15 million acre-feet per year are allocated to seven Western states, of which the five Southwestern states receive about 10 million—Wyoming and Colorado receive the rest. Mexico also has an annual allotment of 1.5 million acre-feet. The river is dammed at various places, with the Hoover Dam on the border of Arizona and Nevada, forming Lake Mead, being the most well-known.

  There are several problems with this allocation. First, the estimates for annual water flow in the Colorado River were based on a survey that occurred during a period of relatively heavy rainfall. It is unlikely that the Colorado River can continue to produce enough water to fill these allocations indefinitely. Evidence of this is seen by the water levels in Lake Mead, which are currently more than 150 feet below peak. Second, the agreement is a zero-sum game: any increase in allocation to one state must necessarily come at the expense of another. This puts pressure on high-growth states like Arizona and Nevada. Finally, there is the problem of the ongoing drought in the region. The drought puts pressure on all water sources, and the Colorado River is no exception. If the drought remains unabated, Lake Mead could eventually become unusable, and hydroelectric generating capacity in the Southwest could fall below minimum requirements as early as the year 2020.

(P1)  Over the past century, the states of Utah, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, and California, forming the Southwestern United States, have experienced tremendous population growth. In the 1910 census, these five states accounted for less than 4 percent of the domestic population. In 2010, this figure was greater than 16 percent. Population growth in the Southwest continues to outstrip growth in the rest of the country, as the region receives positive net migration from other states as well as substantial immigration from foreign countries. Part of the appeal is the pleasant weather, with mild to hot temperatures all year, and low precipitation. However, therein lies the crux of a major problem—the ecosystems of the Southwest are not equipped to sustainably provide enough water for the increasing number of people that live there.

Q:  According to paragraph 1, which of the following is true of population growth in the Southwestern United States?
A central reason for migration to the Southwest is the abundance of natural resources such as water and fertile soil.
Low annual rainfall totals provide a significant reason for people to migrate to the Southwest.
Population growth in the Southwest is driven primarily by foreign immigration.
Net migration from other states is the chief cause of Southwestern population growth.
(P1)  Over the past century, the states of Utah, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, and California, forming the Southwestern United States, have experienced tremendous population growth. In the 1910 census, these five states accounted for less than 4 percent of the domestic population. In 2010, this figure was greater than 16 percent. Population growth in the Southwest continues to outstrip growth in the rest of the country, as the region receives positive net migration from other states as well as substantial immigration from foreign countries. Part of the appeal is the pleasant weather, with mild to hot temperatures all year, and low precipitation. However, therein lies the crux of a major problem—the ecosystems of the Southwest are not equipped to sustainably provide enough water for the increasing number of people that live there.

Q:  The word “crux” in the passage is closest in meaning to
Edge
Answer
Promise
Core
(P2)  All five Southwestern states rely greatly on external water sources, plus groundwater sources, which are large but finite. Per-capita water consumption is also higher than the national average for two reasons. First, these states have a drier climate, so more water is needed for the watering of lawns and gardens. Second, all five states have a substantial farming industry and are exporters of agricultural products domestically and abroad. These states therefore use much more water for irrigation per person than the rest of the United States.

(P3) Water use has become much more efficient across the United States in recent decades. Since 1980, per-capita usage has fallen by about 40 percent. This decline is even more pronounced in the Southwest. However, it is counterbalanced by a comparable growth in population, such that the total amount of water being consumed annually in the Southwest is basically unchanged. This level of usage is not sustainable over the long term.


Q:  According to paragraphs 2 and 3, all of the following statements about water usage in the Southwestern United States are true EXCEPT:
Since 1980, overall water usage in the Southwest has fallen substantially.
More water is consumed per person in the Southwest than in the rest of the United States.
More water is consumed annually in the Southwest than can be naturally replaced.
As net exporters of agricultural products, the Southwestern states use more water per person for farming than most other states.
(P2)  All five Southwestern states rely greatly on external water sources, plus groundwater sources, which are large but finite. Per-capita water consumption is also higher than the national average for two reasons. First, these states have a drier climate, so more water is needed for the watering of lawns and gardens. Second, all five states have a substantial farming industry and are exporters of agricultural products domestically and abroad. These states therefore use much more water for irrigation per person than the rest of the United States.

(P3) Water use has become much more efficient across the United States in recent decades. Since 1980, per-capita usage has fallen by about 40 percent. This decline is even more pronounced in the Southwest. However, it is counterbalanced by a comparable growth in population, such that the total amount of water being consumed annually in the Southwest is basically unchanged. This level of usage is not sustainable over the long term.


Q:  The word finite in the passage is closest in meaning to
Isolated
Limited
Infected
Unending
(P2)  All five Southwestern states rely greatly on external water sources, plus groundwater sources, which are large but finite. Per-capita water consumption is also higher than the national average for two reasons. First, these states have a drier climate, so more water is needed for the watering of lawns and gardens. Second, all five states have a substantial farming industry and are exporters of agricultural products domestically and abroad. These states therefore use much more water for irrigation per person than the rest of the United States.

(P3) Water use has become much more efficient across the United States in recent decades. Since 1980, per-capita usage has fallen by about 40 percent. This decline is even more pronounced in the Southwest. However, it is counterbalanced by a comparable growth in population, such that the total amount of water being consumed annually in the Southwest is basically unchanged. This level of usage is not sustainable over the long term.


Q:  Which of the sentences below best expresses the essential information in the highlighted sentence in paragraph 3? Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or leave out essential information.
Population growth is supported by the decline in water use per person, leading to annually declining water consumption in the Southwest.
The increase in per-person water consumption and population have balanced out the typical water usage in the Southwest.
Declines in per-person water use have stunted population growth in the Southwest.
The population has grown enough to offset the decline in per-capita water use, so the total amount of water used each year in the Southwest has remained about the same.
→(P4)  The Southwestern states consumed a total of 61 million acre-feet1 of water in 2010. About 35 percent of this water comes from groundwater, and the rest comes from surface water, such as lakes and streams. Most of the groundwater being used is not fully replenished. In California alone, the net withdrawal of groundwater, after replenishment from precipitation and surface water, is currently around 10 million acre-feet per year. At this rate, California’s known usable groundwater supplies will be exhausted by the year 2060.

Q:  According to paragraph 4, excessive use of groundwater in parts of the Southwest is noteworthy because
The groundwater draws in contaminants from surface water, its ultimate source
Groundwater provides more than half of the water consumed in these regions
Groundwater will run out eventually if incomplete replenishment continues
A high level of groundwater use is now illegal in certain areas
→(P4)  The Southwestern states consumed a total of 61 million acre-feet1 of water in 2010. About 35 percent of this water comes from groundwater, and the rest comes from surface water, such as lakes and streams. Most of the groundwater being used is not fully replenished. In California alone, the net withdrawal of groundwater, after replenishment from precipitation and surface water, is currently around 10 million acre-feet per year. At this rate, California’s known usable groundwater supplies will be exhausted by the year 2060.

Q:  The word “exhausted” in the passage is closest in meaning to
Expended
Lessened
Ejected
Tainted
→(P5)  For surface water, these five states are heavily reliant on various sources. California has ample native freshwater supplies in the northern and central portions of the state. Excluding California, however, over half of the freshwater needs of the Southwest are met from a single source: the Colorado River. This river originates in the Rocky Mountains and meanders through Utah and Arizona before forming the border of Arizona and Nevada, plus parts of the Arizona–California border. The river then continues into Mexico. 

Q:  According to paragraph 5, one difference between water sources in California and the rest of the Southwestern United States is that
California groundwater resources are being depleted at an alarming rate
The Colorado River runs through or along all the Southwestern states except for California
California uses surface water supplies, while the rest of the Southwest mostly relies on salt water from the ocean
The states other than California depend largely on a particular river, whereas California does not
→(P6)  Allocation of rights to this water has been a political flash point among the Southwestern states since the original Colorado River Compact, drafted in 1922. According to the present version of the Compact, 15 million acre-feet per year are allocated to seven Western states, of which the five Southwestern states receive about 10 million—Wyoming and Colorado receive the rest. Mexico also has an annual allotment of 1.5 million acre-feet. The river is dammed at various places, with the Hoover Dam on the border of Arizona and Nevada, forming Lake Mead, being the most well-known.

Q:  Which of the following can be inferred from paragraph 6 about the Colorado River Compact?
All of the water from the river is allocated to the Southwestern states.
Most of the water from the river is allocated on an annual basis to Mexico.
The original Compact did not fully resolve the political issues related to water rights.
Among the seven Western states, Colorado is the largest recipient of Colorado River water rights.
→(P7)  There are several problems with this allocation. First, the estimates for annual water flow in the Colorado River were based on a survey that occurred during a period of relatively heavy rainfall. It is unlikely that the Colorado River can continue to produce enough water to fill these allocations indefinitely. Evidence of this is seen by the water levels in Lake Mead, which are currently more than 150 feet below peak. Second, the agreement is a zero-sum game: any increase in allocation to one state must necessarily come at the expense of another. This puts pressure on high-growth states like Arizona and Nevada. Finally, there is the problem of the ongoing drought in the region. The drought puts pressure on all water sources, and the Colorado River is no exception. If the drought remains unabated, Lake Mead could eventually become unusable, and hydroelectric generating capacity in the Southwest could fall below minimum requirements as early as the year 2020.

Q:  All of the following are mentioned in paragraph 7 as problems with the Colorado River Compact allocation EXCEPT:
The allocations seem to be larger than the average amount of water carried by the river over time.
If more water is allocated to one state, less must be allocated to another state.
Changes in the compact itself are being driven by just a few high-growth states, such as Arizona and Nevada.
The region is currently experiencing a period of significantly less precipitation than normal.
→(P7)  There are several problems with this allocation. First, the estimates for annual water flow in the Colorado River were based on a survey that occurred during a period of relatively heavy rainfall. It is unlikely that the Colorado River can continue to produce enough water to fill these allocations indefinitely. Evidence of this is seen by the water levels in Lake Mead, which are currently more than 150 feet below peak. Second, the agreement is a zero-sum game: any increase in allocation to one state must necessarily come at the expense of another. This puts pressure on high-growth states like Arizona and Nevada. Finally, there is the problem of the ongoing drought in the region. The drought puts pressure on all water sources, and the Colorado River is no exception. If the drought remains unabated, Lake Mead could eventually become unusable, and hydroelectric generating capacity in the Southwest could fall below minimum requirements as early as the year 2020.

Q:  The word “unabated” in the passage is closest in meaning to
Persistent
Uncontested
Undiscussed
Uneven
→(P7)  There are several problems with this allocation. First, the estimates for annual water flow in the Colorado River were based on a survey that occurred during a period of relatively heavy rainfall. It is unlikely that the Colorado River can continue to produce enough water to fill these allocations indefinitely. Evidence of this is seen by the water levels in Lake Mead, which are currently more than 150 feet below peak. Second, the agreement is a zero-sum game: any increase in allocation to one state must necessarily come at the expense of another. This puts pressure on high-growth states like Arizona and Nevada. Finally, there is the problem of the ongoing drought in the region. The drought puts pressure on all water sources, and the Colorado River is no exception. If the drought remains unabated, Lake Mead could eventually become unusable, and hydroelectric generating capacity in the Southwest could fall below minimum requirements as early as the year 2020.

Q:  What is the author’s purpose in presenting the information in paragraph 7?
To illustrate the importance of having enough water reserves for hydroelectricity generation
To highlight the problems with the Colorado River Compact and the scarcity of water sources in the Southwest
To advocate for reduced per-capita water consumption in the Southwest
To suggest that some residents of the Southwest consider moving to a different region of the country
In paragraph 6 of the passage, there is a missing sentence. The paragraph is repeated below and shows four letters [A], [B], [C], and [D] that indicate where the following sentence could be added.
 
Among other things, this agreement somewhat naively divided the river region into two distinct basins—the Upper Basin and the Lower Basin—and attempted to allocate water to the two basins equally.

 
Where would the sentence best fit?

→(P6)   Allocation of rights to this water has been a political flash point among the Southwestern states since the original Colorado River Compact, drafted in 1922.[A] According to the present version of the Compact, 15 million acre-feet per year are allocated to seven Western states, of which the five Southwestern states receive about 10 million—Wyoming and Colorado receive the rest.[B] Mexico also has an annual allotment of 1.5 million acre-feet.[C] The river is dammed at various places, with the Hoover Dam on the border of Arizona and Nevada, forming Lake Mead, being the most well-known.[D]
Directions: An introductory sentence for a brief summary of the passage is provided below. Complete the summary by selecting the THREE answer choices that express the most important ideas in the passage. Some sentences do not belong in the summary because they express ideas that are not presented in the passage or are minor ideas in the passage. This question is worth 2 points

 
  • The immense population growth enjoyed by the states of the Southwestern United States has stressed water resources in the region.
Immigration from other countries contributes to population growth in the Southwest.
About one-third of the water allocation from the Colorado River Compact goes to states not considered part of the Southwest.
Low rainfall in the area leads to both scarce water supplies and attractive weather, which drives population growth and further strain on those supplies.
Groundwater sources can continue to be used sustainably to meet water demand in the Southwest.
Allocation of surface water in the Southwest is a point of ongoing political contention, particularly with regard to the Colorado River.
Despite declining per-capita water consumption, unchecked demand for water in the region can and will lead to severe consequences.
{"name":"TOEFL Experts Reading Practice 38", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"Reading Section This section measures your ability to understand academic passages in English. You can skip questions and go back to them later as long as there is time remaining. Now begin the Reading section.","img":"https://cdn.poll-maker.com/29-1043861/01-male-bird-shutting-up-female-bird.jpg?sz=1200-00000009211000005300"}
Powered by: Quiz Maker