Unlock hundreds more features
Save your Quiz to the Dashboard
View and Export Results
Use AI to Create Quizzes and Analyse Results

OR
Sign inSign in with Facebook
Sign inSign in with Google
Quizzes > Personality & Relationships

Am I Polyamorous Quiz: Find Your Relationship Style

Quick, free polyamorous test with instant results and simple insights.

Editorial: Review CompletedCreated By: Ray WatkinsUpdated Aug 23, 2025
2-5mins
Profiles
Paper art illustration for polyamory personality quiz on a teal background

This quiz helps you check if polyamory suits you and understand your relationship style. Answer honest questions about boundaries, jealousy, and communication, then see your results instantly. For more insight into how you connect, try our partner type quiz, explore orientation with the am i demiromantic quiz, or map attraction with the attraction type test.

On a Sunday with no plans, how do you most want your romantic life to feel?
Juggling joyful plans with more than one partner, all in the know
Open to whatever fits today, from solo time to one date to a group hang
Curled up with my one person, fully present together
Spontaneous, label-free connection with whoever feels aligned
undefined
Your ideal approach to scheduling and calendars is:
Shared calendars and regular check-ins keep everyone cared for
I adapt the system to the relationship; sometimes structured, sometimes loose
Simple and predictable plans with my one partner
Minimal scheduling; let autonomy and consent guide the flow
undefined
When you hear a partner had a wonderful date with someone else, your first instinct is:
I feel or cultivate compersion and want to celebrate with them
I check in with myself; response varies with context and agreements
I would struggle and prefer our joy to be exclusive
I am happy they followed their truth; no hierarchy needed to validate mine
undefined
In conversations about boundaries, you prefer to:
Document agreements so multiple connections can thrive transparently
Adjust boundaries as the relationship evolves, case by case
Set clear, exclusive boundaries that protect a single bond
Co-create boundaries without default scripts or ranks
undefined
How do you feel about meeting a partner's other partners (metamours)?
I enjoy it; it supports trust, care, and compersion
Open if it serves comfort for everyone; flexible either way
I would rather not; my focus is our exclusive relationship
No obligation; connection is optional and non-hierarchical
undefined
A new connection asks what role you see them playing in your life.
Potentially one of several loved partners, with clear communication
Let us discover together; I can be mono or poly depending on us
My one and only, if we choose each other fully
No predefined roles; let authenticity shape the bond
undefined
Your stance on relationship hierarchy is best described as:
Some structure is helpful, but everyone stays informed and respected
It depends; I can align with or without hierarchy based on fit
I prefer a primary partnership with clear priority
No ranking; each bond stands on its own terms
undefined
When jealousy arises, your go-to response is:
Name it, seek reassurance, and practice compersion-building skills
Assess the context and renegotiate agreements if needed
Refocus on deepening our exclusive bond and shared rituals
Explore the feeling without imposing rules or ranks on others
undefined
Sexual health practices across connections should be:
Transparent, scheduled testing, and disclosed to all affected partners
Aligned with the specific relationship; we set what fits our context
Simple between two committed partners with mutual exclusivity
Decided collaboratively without defaulting to prescriptive rules
undefined
Kitchen-table vs. parallel dynamics, you lean toward:
Kitchen-table when possible; shared warmth supports many ties
Either can work; I match the vibe and needs of people involved
Neither; I want one-to-one exclusivity instead
No labels required; each bond defines its own table
undefined
Holiday planning with partners feels best when:
We co-create a visible plan so everyone feels included and considered
We stay flexible, adjusting as family and partner needs shift
We split or share time as a duo, prioritizing our bond
Traditions can be remixed; no partner is automatically central
undefined
You discover you have limited emotional bandwidth this month.
I communicate early so multiple partners can adjust together
I recalibrate the structure; maybe narrow focus for now, revisit later
I double down on one relationship and simplify commitments
I honor autonomy and let each connection breathe without default pivots
undefined
Sharing relationship status with friends and family, you prefer:
Open about multiple loves, centering honesty and consent
Case-by-case disclosure depending on safety and context
Share as a couple when and how we decide together
Resist labels; I will not justify my bonds for social approval
undefined
A partner requests veto power over your other connections.
Not my style; I prefer consent-based conversations over vetoes
I would only consider it temporarily and with clear review points
That aligns with my preference for exclusive commitment
No hierarchy or ownership; vetoes contradict my values
undefined
Living arrangements you gravitate toward:
Possibly cohabiting with one partner while honoring others transparently
Flexible; cohabit, live apart, or change over time as needed
Cohabiting with my one committed partner
Decentralized; no default nesting, each bond chooses its rhythm
undefined
Conflict repair after a misunderstanding looks like:
Group-aware check-ins if needed, plus direct repair in each bond
Tailor the repair to the relationship; no one-size-fits-all script
Focused dyadic repair and recommitment to us two
Authentic dialogue without imported roles or hierarchies
undefined
On labels like partner, boyfriend, primary, comet, your take is:
Labels help coordinate care across multiple bonds
Use labels when helpful; drop them when not
I prefer the simplicity of one partner and one label
Labels often constrain; I co-create language per connection
undefined
Financial entanglement across relationships should be:
Possible with clear agreements that honor all affected partners
Handled according to each bond; sometimes separate, sometimes shared
Primarily within one committed partnership
Decentralized and consent-based without default primacy
undefined
If a partner wants exclusivity and another wants openness, you would:
Seek a solution honoring all, possibly restructuring with transparency
Evaluate fit; I can move toward either structure by consent and timing
Prioritize a single relationship that aligns with exclusivity
Decline default rules; each bond can exist without forcing sameness
undefined
How do you imagine celebrating a partner's milestone (promotion, art show, etc.)?
Coordinate with others to uplift them collectively and transparently
Choose the celebration style that best fits the moment and the bond
Create an intimate two-person ritual to honor the win
Support them in a way that resists status comparisons
undefined
Long-distance dynamics feel most sustainable when:
Multiple steady bonds offer support while apart, with clarity for all
I flex between intensity and openness as circumstances change
We pour into one connection with dependable rituals and plans
We avoid implying rank; distance does not define importance
undefined
Aftercare following intense emotional moments looks like:
Coordinated care if multiple relationships are impacted
Choose what soothes this bond now; we can change later
Quiet, reliable presence with my one person
No standard protocol; we listen and respond without hierarchy
undefined
Your ideal approach to anniversaries or relationship markers is:
Multiple meaningful markers across different bonds, clearly honored
Define or retire markers as each relationship prefers
One shared anniversary we celebrate deeply together
Reject conventional milestones; create bespoke meaning per bond
undefined
Breakup philosophy resonates most when it:
Considers the wider web of care and keeps channels respectful
Allows graceful pivots; endings can become new forms of connection
Is clean and focused on closing one exclusive chapter
Rejects status ladders about who deserves closure first
undefined
A partner requests a Dont Ask, Dont Tell arrangement.
Not for me; I value transparency across affected relationships
Maybe, if it truly serves safety and we revisit regularly
I prefer no outside partners, so DADT is unnecessary
I resist secrecy as a rule; autonomy and consent come first
undefined
Relationship escalation scripts (dates -> exclusive -> cohabitation) feel:
Optional; I prefer explicit agreements that suit multiple bonds
Sometimes useful, sometimes limiting; depends on us
Comforting; I want the classic path with one partner
Constraining; I prefer to write our own map without hierarchy
undefined
True love is a limited resource that must be reserved for one person.
True
False
undefined
Honest nonmonogamy requires informed consent from everyone affected.
True
False
undefined
Relationship anarchy requires ranking partners by seniority.
True
False
undefined
Monogamy can be a conscious, values-aligned choice rather than a default.
True
False
undefined
0

Profiles

  1. Mono-Leaning -

    You appreciate deep, exclusive bonds and often find comfort in monogamy, even if you sometimes ask "am I polyamorous?" Your clear boundaries and focus on one partner guide your relationship style. Tip: Reflect on your core needs and communicate openly with loved ones to confirm what feels most authentic.

  2. Poly Curious Explorer -

    You're intrigued by the idea of multiple meaningful connections and often find yourself taking an "am I poly?" approach to dating. You're open to new experiences but prefer to learn at your own pace. Tip: Start by mapping your emotional needs and using our polyamory quiz to track your evolving comfort levels.

  3. Ethical Poly Enthusiast -

    You resonate strongly with polyamory, embracing multiple relationships built on trust, transparency, and compersion. Your honest communication and respect for boundaries empower you to nurture several partnerships responsibly. Tip: Keep refining your agreements and check in regularly to sustain healthy connections.

  4. Hierarchical Harmonizer -

    You enjoy having a primary partnership alongside secondary relationships, valuing both depth and variety. Clear roles and agreements help you balance emotional investment across connections. Tip: Schedule consistent check-ins with each partner to ensure all voices are heard and respected.

  5. Relationship Anarchist -

    You reject predefined structures and prefer fluid, self-determined connections without imposed hierarchies. Autonomy and mutual respect guide your diverse relationship network. Tip: Co-create boundaries through open dialogue to maintain trust and personal freedom for everyone involved.

Make a Quiz (FREE) Copy & Edit This Quiz Create a Quiz with AI

Personality Quizzes

Powered by: Quiz Maker