Unlock hundreds more features
Save your Quiz to the Dashboard
View and Export Results
Use AI to Create Quizzes and Analyse Results

OR
Sign inSign in with Facebook
Sign inSign in with Google
Quizzes > Society & Culture > Philosophy & Ethics

Logical Fallacy Game: Test Your Critical Thinking

Ready to identify logical fallacies? Take this fun logical fallacy quiz!

Difficulty: Moderate
2-5mins
Learning OutcomesCheat Sheet
Paper art illustration for logical fallacy game quiz on a golden yellow background

This logical fallacy quiz helps you spot flawed arguments like ad hominem, slippery slope, and begging the question. Work through quick questions to practice clear thinking and have a little fun. When you finish, keep practicing with the next quiz and try the challenge round .

Which logical fallacy involves attacking the person making an argument rather than the argument itself?
Straw man
Red herring
Ad hominem
Appeal to authority
Ad hominem occurs when someone attacks the character or traits of the person making an argument instead of engaging with the substance of the argument. This distracts from the key issues and undermines critical discussion. It's a common tactic in debates to divert attention away from the real topic.
Which fallacy misrepresents an opponent's position to make it easier to attack?
Red herring
Straw man
Slippery slope
False analogy
The straw man fallacy occurs when someone distorts or oversimplifies an opponent's argument, attacking this weaker version instead of the original claim. This misleading tactic shifts the focus away from the actual points under discussion. Recognizing a straw man helps maintain honest and productive debates.
Which fallacy occurs when someone relies on an unqualified authority as evidence for a claim?
Appeal to authority
Genetic fallacy
Bandwagon
False cause
An appeal to authority fallacy occurs when someone cites an authority who is not a subject-matter expert or whose credibility is irrelevant to the claim. This shifts the burden of proof away from substantive evidence. Proper evaluation requires verifying an authority's expertise and relevance.
Which fallacy presents only two options as if they are the only possibilities?
Slippery slope
No true Scotsman
False dichotomy
Circular reasoning
A false dichotomy falsely limits the range of options to two extremes, ignoring viable alternatives. It forces a choice between A or B when other possibilities may exist. This oversimplification distorts the complexity of most issues.
Which fallacy suggests that one event will inevitably lead to a chain of related events with a negative outcome?
Slippery slope
Appeal to emotion
Begging the question
Red herring
A slippery slope argument asserts that a relatively small first step will lead to a series of dire consequences without sufficient evidence. It exaggerates the likelihood of negative outcomes to discourage an action. Critical thinking requires assessing each causal link independently.
Which fallacy occurs when the conclusion is assumed in one of the premises, resulting in circular reasoning?
Begging the question
Appeal to tradition
False cause
Equivocation
Begging the question is a form of circular reasoning where the conclusion is implicitly or explicitly presumed in the premises. This fails to provide independent support for the argument's conclusion. Identifying this fallacy helps ensure arguments are properly substantiated.
Which fallacy draws a general conclusion from a small or unrepresentative sample?
Appeal to emotion
Hasty generalization
False analogy
Genetic fallacy
A hasty generalization occurs when a broad conclusion is made based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence. It overlooks variability and complexity within the full data set. Sound reasoning requires adequate and relevant examples.
Which fallacy attempts to manipulate emotions instead of presenting valid arguments?
Red herring
Appeal to authority
Bandwagon
Appeal to emotion
An appeal to emotion fallacy seeks to sway the audience by exploiting feelings rather than logic or evidence. This tactic distracts from the strength of the actual argument. Recognizing it safeguards rational decision-making.
Which fallacy assumes that because one event followed another, the first event must have caused the second?
Appeal to nature
Circular reasoning
Straw man
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
The post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy mistakes sequential order for causation, claiming that because event A preceded event B, A must have caused B. This overlooks other potential causes and coincidences. Valid reasoning requires independent evidence of a causal link.
Which fallacy distracts from the main issue by introducing an irrelevant topic?
Red herring
False dichotomy
Appeal to pity
Loaded question
A red herring diverts attention from the central issue by bringing in an unrelated argument or detail. This makes it harder to address the original point directly. Identifying red herrings keeps discussions focused on relevant evidence.
Which fallacy claims a proposition is true because many people believe it?
Appeal to authority
No true Scotsman
Middle ground
Bandwagon
The bandwagon fallacy (argumentum ad populum) asserts that a claim is valid simply because it is popular. Popularity does not guarantee truth and this argument ignores evidence. Critical thinking requires independent evaluation of claims.
Which fallacy argues that a claim is correct because it is traditional or has always been done that way?
Slippery slope
False analogy
Appeal to novelty
Appeal to tradition
An appeal to tradition (argumentum ad antiquitatem) claims something is right or better simply because it is established or customary. This overlooks whether the tradition is justified by reason and evidence. Evaluating traditions requires current relevance and justification.
Which fallacy dismisses counterexamples by changing the definition of a group to exclude them?
Special pleading
No true Scotsman
Equivocation
Genetic fallacy
The no true Scotsman fallacy redefines a group in an ad hoc way to protect a universal generalization from counterexamples. It shifts criteria without justification whenever evidence contradicts the claim. This tactic insulates the argument from legitimate criticism.
Which fallacy attempts to discredit an opponent's argument by pointing out hypocrisy or inconsistency?
Ad hominem
Tu quoque
Straw man
Red herring
The tu quoque fallacy deflects criticism by accusing the opponent of the same or similar wrongdoing, rather than addressing the argument itself. It shifts focus to the opponent's behavior instead of the merits of the original claim. Recognizing this fallacy helps maintain focus on logical evidence.
Which fallacy judges an argument based on its origin rather than its merits?
False cause
Genetic fallacy
Ad hominem
Appeal to authority
The genetic fallacy dismisses or accepts a claim based solely on its source, not its actual content. Evaluating arguments requires assessing evidence and reasoning instead of origin. Overcoming this fallacy promotes fair and unbiased analysis.
Which fallacy occurs when the burden of proof is placed on someone else to disprove a claim?
False dichotomy
Shifting the burden of proof
Hasty generalization
Appeal to ignorance
Shifting the burden of proof demands that others disprove a claim rather than the claimant providing evidence. This unfairly places the onus of justification on skeptics. Valid arguments require the proponent to offer support for their assertions.
Which fallacy assumes that what is true of the parts must also be true of the whole?
Middle ground fallacy
Fallacy of composition
Fallacy of division
False analogy
The fallacy of composition infers that because individual components have certain properties, the combined entity must share those properties. This overlooks interactions or emergent characteristics at the group level. Critical evaluation examines group properties independently.
Which fallacy uses a key term in multiple senses, creating ambiguity in the argument?
Amphiboly
Equivocation
Straw man
Appeal to nature
Equivocation occurs when a word or phrase is used with different meanings in the same argument, leading to a misleading conclusion. Recognizing equivocation involves pinpointing shifts in definition. Clarity in language ensures logical consistency.
Which fallacy stems from ambiguous sentence structure that allows multiple interpretations?
False cause
Amphiboly
Equivocation
Circular reasoning
Amphiboly arises when a sentence's grammar or syntax is ambiguous, permitting more than one interpretation. Exploiting this ambiguity can mislead audiences. Precise wording is essential to avoid this fallacy.
Which fallacy draws a comparison between two things that are not sufficiently alike?
False analogy
Slippery slope
Hasty generalization
Straw man
A false analogy asserts that because two items share some characteristics, they must be alike in other respects, overlooking critical differences. It weakens arguments by relying on superficial similarities. Effective analogy demands relevant parallels.
Which fallacy assumes that something is good or right because it is perceived as natural?
Appeal to tradition
Red herring
Appeal to novelty
Appeal to nature
The appeal to nature fallacy argues that natural products or behaviors are inherently superior, ignoring that natural does not always mean safe or ethical. It overlooks scientific evidence and context. Sound judgments consider evidence over mere naturalness.
Which fallacy assumes the middle position between two extremes is always the correct one?
Middle ground fallacy
False compromise
Straw man
False dichotomy
The middle ground fallacy claims that a compromise between two opposing views is inherently valid, regardless of evidence. It ignores scenarios where one side may be clearly correct or where no compromise is possible. Critical reasoning evaluates each position on merit.
Which fallacy appeals to pity in place of a logical argument?
Appeal to emotion
Appeal to pity
Ad hominem
Slippery slope
An appeal to pity (ad misericordiam) tries to win support by eliciting sympathy rather than presenting valid evidence or reasoning. This distracts from the actual merits of the argument. Recognizing it ensures arguments rest on facts, not feelings.
Which fallacy involves making an exception for one's own argument without proper justification?
No true Scotsman
Shifting the burden of proof
Slippery slope
Special pleading
Special pleading occurs when someone applies principles to others while exempting themselves without adequate reasons. It creates arbitrary exceptions to avoid counterarguments. Fair discourse requires consistent application of rules.
Which fallacy rejects a proposed solution because it is not perfect, despite its benefits?
False dilemma
Nirvana fallacy
Appeal to perfection
Red herring
The nirvana fallacy dismisses realistic solutions by comparing them to an idealized, perfect alternative that may not exist. This sets unattainable standards and prevents practical improvements. Recognizing this fallacy helps in seeking workable, evidence-based approaches.
Which fallacy moves the criteria or standards after they have been met, preventing agreement?
Special pleading
Moving the goalposts
Shifting the burden of proof
Tu quoque
Moving the goalposts involves changing requirements for acceptance once they have been satisfied, thus undermining consensus. It unfairly alters the terms of debate mid-discussion. Awareness of this fallacy helps maintain consistent evaluation.
Which fallacy frames a question to assume something unproven, trapping the respondent?
False dilemma
Loaded question
Straw man
Begging the question
A loaded question contains an implicit assumption that has not been proven, forcing the respondent to accept it when answering. This traps the respondent into validating the assumption. Identifying it protects against unfair interrogation tactics.
Which fallacy selectively presents evidence supporting one side while ignoring evidence that contradicts it?
Appeal to authority
Confirmation bias
Hasty generalization
Cherry picking
Cherry picking involves focusing on favorable data and ignoring the full range of evidence. This misleads by presenting a biased subset of information. Robust analysis requires considering all relevant facts.
0
{"name":"Which logical fallacy involves attacking the person making an argument rather than the argument itself?", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"Which logical fallacy involves attacking the person making an argument rather than the argument itself?, Which fallacy misrepresents an opponent's position to make it easier to attack?, Which fallacy occurs when someone relies on an unqualified authority as evidence for a claim?","img":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/3012/images/ogquiz.png"}

Study Outcomes

  1. Analyze Common Fallacies -

    After playing our logical fallacy game, you'll learn to distinguish between ad hominem, begging the question, and more to sharpen your analytical eye.

  2. Identify Fallacies in Real Arguments -

    Engage with our free logical fallacy quiz and practice spotting flawed reasoning in everyday discussions and debates.

  3. Apply Critical Thinking Strategies -

    Use methods from the fallacy identification game to assess evidence, uncover hidden assumptions, and strengthen your logical evaluation.

  4. Evaluate Argument Structures -

    Break down argument components to recognize patterns of critical thinking fallacies and assess the validity of presented claims.

  5. Enhance Persuasive Communication -

    Learn to avoid committing logical fallacies in your own writing and speech by understanding how flawed arguments undermine persuasion.

  6. Track Progress and Boost Confidence -

    Monitor improvements throughout the identify logical fallacies quiz and build confidence in your critical thinking and argument skills.

Cheat Sheet

  1. Ad Hominem Fallacy -

    This fallacy attacks the person instead of engaging with their argument, for example, "Don't listen to her opinion - she's inexperienced." Spotting it in your logical fallacy game keeps you focused on reasoning, not personalities (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). To practice, reframe critiques to challenge the argument itself rather than the arguer.

  2. Begging the Question (Circular Reasoning) -

    Begging the question occurs when a conclusion is assumed in its premises, like "Ghosts exist because I've seen a ghost." Identifying this in a logical fallacy quiz trains you to demand independent support for each claim (Purdue OWL). A handy trick is to ask, "How do I know that?" - if the answer refers back to the claim, you've caught circularity.

  3. Straw Man Fallacy -

    The straw man distorts an opponent's argument into an exaggerated or misrepresented version, e.g., "You want school uniforms; you hate self-expression." In a fallacy identification game, spotting straw men strengthens genuine debate (University of North Carolina). Always restate the original case in your own words before critiquing to ensure accuracy.

  4. False Cause Fallacy (Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc) -

    This error assumes that because Event B follows Event A, A must have caused B, such as "I wore my lucky socks and passed the test." Recognizing it in critical thinking fallacies prevents unwarranted causal leaps (American Psychological Association). A quick check: look for confounding factors or alternative explanations.

  5. SPOT Mnemonic for Fallacy Detection -

    Use SPOT - Simplify the claim, Pinpoint the flaw, Outline supporting evidence, Test alternatives - to streamline identifying fallacies in a fallacy identification game. This four-step approach comes from teaching guides at the University of Oxford's Critical Thinking program. With SPOT in your toolkit, you'll ace any logical fallacy quiz with confidence.

Make a Quiz (FREE) Copy & Edit This Quiz Create a Quiz with AI

Philosophy & Ethics Quizzes

Powered by: Quiz Maker