Unlock hundreds more features
Save your Quiz to the Dashboard
View and Export Results
Use AI to Create Quizzes and Analyse Results

OR
Sign inSign in with Facebook
Sign inSign in with Google
Quizzes > Society & Culture

Am I a Nazi Quiz: Reflect on Your Beliefs

Quick, free nazism test to reflect on your views. Instant results.

Editorial: Review CompletedCreated By: Zyrhya ThomasUpdated Aug 27, 2025
2-5mins
Profiles
Paper art illustration of a computer monitor with quiz icons and colorful confetti on a dark blue background.

This Am I a Nazi quiz helps you reflect on your views and see how they compare with Nazi ideology. Use the results as a starting point for self-awareness; you might also explore how you handle influence with our naive test, check your ethics in the am i evil quiz, or look at everyday behavior with an are you a jerk quiz.

You see a post blaming a whole minority group for a city's crime spike. What do you do first?
Look for broader data and multiple sources before forming an opinion
Consider whether long-standing community rules have been ignored and check official crime reports
Share the post to alert your group and support stronger policing right away
Accept the claim as proof that harsh measures against that group are needed
undefined
Your town plans a new cultural festival alongside a cherished traditional parade. How do you respond?
Support both, and ask how to include everyone respectfully
Keep the parade's core customs while adding carefully vetted new elements
Limit the new festival to avoid confusion and focus on clear, unified messaging
Scrap the new festival because mixing cultures weakens the community
undefined
A leader proposes broad surveillance to restore safety after unrest. Your stance?
Ask how it impacts civil liberties and vulnerable groups, and seek narrower options
Consider temporary, accountable measures within the rule of law and oversight
Back firm surveillance to deter troublemakers and signal control
Approve sweeping surveillance targeting suspect groups to cleanse disorder
undefined
A viral meme perfectly flatters your side but lacks a source. What's your move?
Hold off and verify with reputable outlets across perspectives
Check if authoritative institutions or records support the claim
Share it because it boosts unity and morale for your group
Spread it widely to expose opponents, accuracy is secondary to loyalty
undefined
A friend uses dehumanizing language about a group during a heated chat. How do you respond?
Name the harm, invite reflection, and refocus on shared human dignity
Remind them of community standards and the importance of respectful speech
Let it slide because confronting it could divide the group further
Agree and escalate with harsher labels to strengthen in‑group bonding
undefined
Different outlets report wildly different protest sizes. What's your best practice?
Compare methods, look for independent counts, and weigh uncertainty openly
Check official permits and police logs for baselines, then adjust cautiously
Trust the outlet aligned with your side for clarity and consistency
Assume exaggeration by enemies and suppression by traitors; numbers don't matter
undefined
A neighbor's religious attire becomes a topic in your HOA forum. Your approach?
Affirm their right to expression and ask how to keep the forum welcoming
Refer to established HOA rules, ensuring they protect freedom without disruption
Push for a clear uniform policy to avoid controversy altogether
Argue that such attire is a threat and should be banned outright to protect us
undefined
A nostalgic post romanticizes a "pure" past that excluded certain groups. How do you react?
Question who was left out and highlight stories of those harmed or silenced
Acknowledge heritage while noting legal and moral progress since then
Agree that stricter norms kept order and society should re‑tighten rules
Endorse returning to that purity by force if needed to remove corrupting elements
undefined
You encounter a thread claiming a secret cabal controls everything. What next?
Probe for evidence, check expert debunks, and ask who benefits from the claim
Look for institutional transparency reports and credible investigative journalism
Accept it if it aligns with your group's worldview; loyalty matters more than proof
Share it as a rallying cry against the enemy elite; truth is less important than action
undefined
A candidate blames a single out‑group for all economic woes. Your evaluation?
Seek policies that help across groups and reject scapegoating rhetoric
Ask for data, legal feasibility, and safeguards against discrimination
Prefer their tough talk as a sign of decisive leadership in hard times
Applaud punishing that group to restore national strength, whatever it takes
undefined
Family lore conflicts with current research about a controversial policy. You will...
Listen to relatives' experiences and compare with diverse, credible studies
Respect traditions while accepting updated evidence where warranted
Stick with the family line because it keeps us unified and confident
Reject the research as propaganda meant to erase our people's truth
undefined
A colleague vents about a diversity initiative. How do you engage?
Ask open questions, seek common goals, and discuss evidence of outcomes
Review the policy against company standards and laws, improving where needed
Back the loudest position to prevent internal division and keep order
Denounce dissenters as enemies and push to remove them from the workplace
undefined
Parents petition to remove a book about a marginalized group from the school library. Your position?
Advocate inclusive access with age-appropriate guidance and dialogue
Follow transparent review policies rooted in law and educational standards
Support removal to keep a clear, uncontested set of materials for unity
Demand purges of all materials that challenge your group's worldview
undefined
An online community debates strict moderation rules. Where do you land?
Promote rules that curb harassment while protecting viewpoint diversity
Favor consistent, transparent enforcement grounded in clear norms
Prefer aggressive removals to keep messaging crisp and aligned with the core group
Push to silence or dox opponents as a show of strength and dominance
undefined
After a disaster, a rumor says "outsiders" are looting. Your reaction?
Verify with local officials and reporters; avoid stereotyping disaster victims
Check emergency communications and established protocols before sharing
Share immediately to mobilize neighborhood patrols and protect property
Assume the rumor proves outsiders are predators who must be driven out by force
undefined
A short, shocking video of alleged police misconduct trends. What is your first step?
Acknowledge possible harm, then seek full context and credible follow-ups
Check departmental policy, oversight records, and official statements
Back the institution publicly to prevent chaos and second-guess later if needed
Declare the targets subhuman and call for retaliation, facts aside
undefined
Athletes kneel during the anthem to protest injustice. How do you interpret it?
As a nonviolent appeal to shared values; listen and discuss substance
As protected expression to be weighed against team rules and public norms
As a breach of unity; prefer firm policies that keep demonstrations out of sports
As treasonous; demand punishment to make an example of them and their supporters
undefined
Your feed only shows news that mirrors your views. What do you do?
Intentionally add credible sources with different perspectives
Opt for balanced outlets with editorial standards and ombuds oversight
Stick with aligned sources to maintain clarity and morale
Block opposing outlets as enemies spreading poison to our people
undefined
A friend shares a satire article as if it were real. Your reply?
Kindly note it's satire, share a source, and discuss why it felt believable
Point to the site's disclosure and suggest checking publisher info next time
Ignore the mistake to avoid confusion; better to keep the group aligned
Double down on the claim since it hurts the other side, truth aside
undefined
Debating immigration, someone says newcomers are inherently criminal. You...
Challenge the stereotype with data and human stories, seeking practical fixes
Discuss enforcement and integration policies within constitutional limits
Support firm borders first; details and exceptions risk undermining order
Agree criminals come from specific groups and should be expelled as a class
undefined
A proposed school rule would ban all political symbols. Your view?
Prefer content-neutral guidance that protects student rights and dialogue
Support a carefully drafted, lawful policy for fairness and predictability
Back a strict ban to keep order and avoid any controversy in school spaces
Demand a ban targeting symbols of out-groups while exempting ours
undefined
A neighbor suggests armed patrols to stop perceived "outsider" graffiti. Your response?
Urge nonviolent solutions, community art projects, and evidence-based prevention
Propose neighborhood watch with training and coordination with local law within legal bounds
Support visible patrols to project strength and deter any challengers
Endorse targeting suspected groups to teach them a lesson and reclaim space
undefined
A coworker from an opposing political camp invites you to coffee. You feel...
Curious to learn their story and compare notes respectfully
Willing, if you can set norms for civil conversation and time limits
Reluctant; better to keep distance and avoid confusing messages about loyalty
Hostile; you'd rather expose and humiliate them publicly to deter others
undefined
A proposal would give a council emergency powers with strict time limits. You think...
Safeguards and community input are essential; prioritize rights and transparency
Time‑bound powers with audits can preserve order while respecting law
Grant broad authority; strong hands prevent chaos and second-guessing
Make powers indefinite and target dissenters to cleanse disloyal elements
undefined
A charity campaign centers the voices of people affected by a conflict. You...
Listen to diverse firsthand accounts and support aid that protects civilians
Check the charity's compliance, governance, and impact evaluations
Prefer organizations endorsed by your group; alignment is the key filter
Support only groups that aid our side and deny help to the other as punishment
undefined
A public figure admits past mistakes after hearing affected communities. Your reaction?
Value the humility and ask how accountability turns into better policy
Assess sincerity against a track record and institutional checks
Prefer unwavering certainty; apologies signal weakness and invite disorder
Dismiss apologies as betrayal unless they target out‑groups more harshly
undefined
A neighbor from a different background helps you during a tough time. You later...
Reflect on how this challenges stereotypes and look for ways to reciprocate
Thank them and suggest a block meeting to strengthen norms of mutual aid
Appreciate the help but keep distance to avoid mixed signals about loyalty
Deny the event matters; outsiders remain untrustworthy regardless of deeds
undefined
A bill would require ID checks for online accounts to reduce abuse. You say...
Balance safety with privacy; consider targeted verification and appeal channels
Support measured rules with clear due process and audits to prevent overreach
Favor universal ID checks for clarity and discipline across platforms
Cheer full tracking to identify and punish dissidents who oppose your in‑group
undefined
A community forum asks for ideas to reduce political tension. You propose...
Story exchanges, joint service projects, and ground rules for respectful debate
Civics workshops on law, rights, and responsibilities with neutral facilitation
Clear codes of conduct with strict penalties to prevent dissent from derailing meetings
Excluding opposing groups entirely to keep the forum pure and energized
undefined
Violence against civilians can be justified if your side is provoked.
True
False
undefined
0

Profiles

  1. The Balanced Observer -

    You scored low on extremist beliefs in this nazism test and demonstrate open-minded, analytical thinking. You recognize multiple viewpoints and question assumptions like "am I related to Hitler?" Tip: Keep challenging your biases with trusted history sources and continue fostering respectful dialogue.

  2. The Heritage Seeker -

    Your results suggest curiosity about your roots without embracing extremist ideologies. You might wonder "am I related to Hitler?" but you approach the question with academic interest rather than fanaticism. Quick action: Explore reputable genealogy tools and context-rich histories to satisfy your quest responsibly.

  3. The Order-Focused Traditionalist -

    You show moderate agreement with hierarchical values common in a fascism ideology test but remain critical of absolute authority. Your respect for structure can tip toward rigidity if unchecked. Tip: Balance order with empathy - read up on democratic principles and take a follow-up extremist beliefs quiz to track your progress.

  4. The Authoritarian Sympathizer -

    Your answers align with several authoritarian themes in this nazi personality quiz, like strong leadership preference and in-group loyalty. While not fully extremist, you're at risk of sliding toward more radical views. Next step: Engage in open debates, study the consequences of totalitarian regimes, and retake the fascism ideology test after reflection.

  5. The Extremist Risk Alert -

    You scored highest on extremist beliefs in the extremist beliefs quiz component of our nazism test, indicating a strong affinity for radical ideologies. Immediate action: Seek professional insight - contact a counselor or join an educational forum on democratic values to de-escalate extremist tendencies.

Make a Quiz (FREE) Copy & Edit This Quiz Create a Quiz with AI

Politics & Civics Quizzes

Powered by: Quiz Maker