Unlock hundreds more features
Save your Quiz to the Dashboard
View and Export Results
Use AI to Create Quizzes and Analyse Results

OR
Sign inSign in with Facebook
Sign inSign in with Google
Quizzes > Business & Finance

Facilitator Feedback Survey: Quick Evaluation Quiz

Quick, free facilitator evaluation quiz. Instant results to improve training.

Editorial: Review CompletedCreated By: Emma SmithUpdated Aug 27, 2025
2-5mins
Profiles
Paper art quiz illustration on coral background showing facilitator survey feedback icons and challenge elements

This quiz helps you plan and run a facilitator feedback survey that gathers clear, actionable input from learners and SMEs. You will check what to ask about goals, delivery, and results to improve each session. After you finish, explore the facilitator skills assessment, try a workplace training assessment, and build rapport with our interpersonal communication skills test.

How clearly did you understand the session objectives explained by the facilitator?
I suggested ways to refine and improve the stated objectives.
I considered if the objectives balanced breadth and depth appropriately.
I highlighted whether the objectives covered important topics thoroughly.
I commented on how engaging the objectives sounded to participants.
I evaluated if the objectives were communicated clearly and understandably.
How engaged did you feel with the facilitator's methods during this training session?
I noted how straightforward the methods were to follow.
I focused on how energized and involved I felt during activities.
I reflected on whether methods balanced presentation and interaction well.
I proposed enhancements to boost participant involvement.
I analyzed whether the methods offered deep exploration of key concepts.
How relevant were the facilitator's examples to your work and experiences?
I checked if the examples were clear and easy to understand.
I observed if the examples sparked greater participant interest.
I recommended adjustments to make examples more applicable.
I assessed whether examples struck a good balance of contexts.
I examined how thoroughly the examples connected to subject details.
How comfortable did you feel asking questions and receiving feedback from the facilitator?
I judged how clear and concise the feedback interactions were.
I gauged whether I felt supported and engaged during feedback.
I measured the overall balance between feedback depth and clarity.
I suggested ways to improve approachability in question periods.
I assessed if feedback sessions delved into detailed topic aspects.
How effectively did the facilitator manage the session's time and pace?
I judged whether timing instructions were clear and consistent.
I noted if pacing kept energy levels high throughout.
I recommended time management tweaks for smoother flow.
I evaluated if time distribution felt balanced across topics.
I inspected time allocation for in-depth discussion segments.
How useful were the instructional materials the facilitator provided for your learning?
I suggested improvements to increase material effectiveness.
I judged whether the materials were clear and easy to follow.
I reflected on how well materials balanced visuals and text.
I evaluated material depth and comprehensive content coverage.
I observed if materials enhanced engagement and interactivity.
How well did the facilitator encourage interaction among participants?
I analyzed interaction design for depth of peer learning.
I noted clarity of instructions for interactive segments.
I considered if interactions balanced structure and spontaneity.
I commented on how lively and engaging discussions became.
I proposed methods to boost participant collaboration.
How satisfied are you with the facilitator's ability to handle diverse skill levels?
I recommended strategies to address skill gaps more effectively.
I gauged if adjustments balanced complexity and accessibility.
I focused on whether learners felt motivated at every level.
I assessed if explanations were clear for varying backgrounds.
I examined how well content catered to advanced topic nuances.
How clear were the instructions given by the facilitator for activities?
I evaluated if instruction detail balanced brevity and completeness.
I delved into detail to ensure instructions covered all nuances.
I suggested clarifications to prevent any confusion.
I judged whether steps were communicated plainly and coherently.
I observed if instructions fostered participant enthusiasm.
How responsive was the facilitator to unexpected challenges during the training?
I reflected on if the facilitator balanced speed and quality in responses.
I proposed ideas to improve agile handling of issues.
I noted how quickly the facilitator re-engaged participants.
I assessed whether responses were communicated clearly and calmly.
I analyzed the depth of solutions offered under pressure.
How well did the facilitator align the content with your learning objectives?
I assessed clarity of linkage between content and objectives.
I evaluated if alignment balanced scope and learner needs.
I recommended tweaks to better match learner goals.
I examined alignment details for in-depth subject relevance.
I commented on how motivating the content felt overall.
How balanced was the facilitator's mix of lecture and interactive activities?
I noted how engaging the overall format remained.
I judged if the blend was communicated clearly ahead of time.
I considered if the balance maintained consistent momentum.
I analyzed whether the mix supported thorough concept exploration.
I suggested adjustments to optimize the lecture-activity ratio.
How confident do you feel applying what you learned from the facilitator?
I evaluated depth of my understanding for practical application.
I judged clarity of instructions supporting confident application.
I assessed if confidence stemmed from a balanced learning approach.
I reflected on how excited I feel to use new skills.
I proposed ways to reinforce comfort before practical use.
How approachable was the facilitator when you needed additional support?
I considered if support channels were balanced and accessible.
I suggested improvements to increase facilitator approachability.
I commented on how welcomed and engaged I felt seeking help.
I detailed the depth of guidance offered during support requests.
I judged whether support availability was communicated clearly.
How likely are you to recommend this facilitator to a colleague?
I suggested ways to improve areas before I recommend.
I focused on how enthusiastic I felt about recommending.
I considered how many in-depth strengths existed to endorse.
I reflected on whether pros and cons felt balanced in endorsement.
I assessed if recommendation criteria were clear and justified.
{"name":"How clearly did you understand the session objectives explained by the facilitator?", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"How clearly did you understand the session objectives explained by the facilitator?, How engaged did you feel with the facilitator's methods during this training session?, How relevant were the facilitator's examples to your work and experiences?","img":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/3012/images/ogquiz.png"}

Profiles

  1. The Engaging Maestro -

    You recognize a facilitator who excels at keeping learners active and interested, demonstrating mastery in interactive methods. Your detailed input on facilitator survey questions can help them refine session dynamics - suggest new interactive tools in your facilitator feedback form to elevate engagement.

  2. The Precision Analyst -

    Your evaluation zeroes in on clarity, structure, and pacing, showing you value a tightly organized session. Use your insights from the SME facilitator questionnaire to highlight where objectives align or drift, ensuring every learning outcome is met with precision.

  3. The Constructive Coach -

    You deliver balanced feedback that acknowledges strengths while pinpointing improvement areas, making you a trusted partner in training facilitator evaluation. In your next facilitator review questions, pair every critique with a concrete suggestion to drive actionable growth.

  4. The Strategic Partner -

    You focus on aligning session goals with business outcomes, offering high-level insights into curriculum relevance and impact. Leverage your perspective in the facilitator feedback form to recommend strategic tweaks that enhance ROI and learner satisfaction.

  5. The Insightful Diplomat -

    You blend encouragement with candid observations, fostering a positive yet honest review atmosphere. When filling out facilitator review questions, continue to weave in examples of best practices alongside your constructive remarks to support continuous improvement.

Make a Quiz (FREE) Copy & Edit This Quiz Create a Quiz with AI

Marketing & Management Quizzes

Powered by: Quiz Maker