Practice Property Midterm
Property Law Midterm Quiz
Test your knowledge of property law with this engaging midterm quiz designed for students and enthusiasts alike. Navigate through various hypothetical scenarios related to property rights, adverse possession, and more.
- 10 thought-provoking questions
- Multiple choice format
- Challenge your understanding of property law principles
While sitting in his backyard, Noah noticed a squirrel (whose nest was in a neighboring yard) slowly moving over his grass looking for nuts. Suddenly, a stranger, Ava, jumped over Noah’s fence, grabbed the squirrel, and ran away. If Noah sues Ava to recover the squirrel, who will win?
A. Ava, because she was the first to gain certain control of the squirrel.
B. Ava, because the squirrel did not live on Noah’s property.
C. Noah, because Ava was a trespasser.
D. Noah, because the rule of capture requires the animal be on unowned property.
Elsie finds an unoccupied one-acre tract of rural land. She buys a used mobile home, which she places near one of the front corners of the tract. Elsie uses the mobile home as her residence, living there continually with the exception of infrequent, short vacations. Immediately adjacent to the home she plants a small area with grass and flowers, which she thereafter maintains in a neat and attractive condition. Elsie has two dogs, which she lets run loose whenever she lets them outside her home. They wander throughout the one-acre tract. Elsie notices that along the rear boundary of the tract there are wild blackberry bushes. They bear fruit annually, and each year she picks berries, which she eats and shares with friends and relatives. Assuming that Elsie’s activities continue for a period longer than the relevant statute of limitations, Elsie may obtain title by adverse possession to the following part of the tract:
A. None of the tract.
B. The area on which the mobile home rests.
C. The area on which the mobile home rests and the area with grass and flowers.
D. The area on which the mobile home rests, the area with grass and flowers, and the area with the blackberry bushes.
E. All of the tract.
Bob holds title to Redacre, a 100-year-old mansion. Over the objection of his family and his neighbors, Bob plans to demolish Redacre in a week. A group of Bob’s neighbors file suit, seeking a court order to prevent the demolition. What is the most likely basis for obtaining such an order?
A. Demolition of Redacre would lower the value of the neighbors’ houses.
B. Redacre is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
C. Demolition of Redacre would leave Bob penniless.
D. Demolition of Redacre would release asbestos particles that endanger public health.
In 2000, Joe purchased a two bedroom condominium, intending to move into the unit when he retired. The condominium was located in a state far from his current residence. Unbeknownst to Joe, Skyla occupied Joe’s condominium unit for three years, beginning in 2001. Skyla knew that someone else owned the unit, and often commented to her friends, “Hey, if the owner isn’t going to use it, I might as well use it.” When Skyla needed to leave the unit in 2004 because of a job transfer, she conveyed all interest she had in the condominium unit as well as all her furniture to a coworker, Danica, for $175,000. Danica occupied the unit for nine more years, at the end of which Joe appeared, having recently retired. The jurisdiction has a ten year statutory period for adverse possession and applies the modern rule re intent. In a suit to quiet title, how should a court rule?
A. Joe owns the condominium unit because Skyla knew she did not own the unit.
B. Joe owns the condominium unit because neither Skyla nor Danica met the ten year statutory period.
C. Danica owns the condominium unit because there was privity between Danica and Skyla.
D. Danica owns the condominium unit because awarding her the title furthers adverse possession’s goal of encouraging the productive use of land.
Catalina owned Desertacre in 2000 when Mira took possession. Catalina was mentally incompetent at the time Mira began her occupancy. In 2002, Catalina died intestate never having regained mental capacity. Her sole heir was her brother Felipe who was also mentally incompetent. Felipe regained mental competency in 2020. The statutory period in this jurisdiction in ten years. A statute in this jurisdiction also provides: “If a person entitled to bring an action in adverse possession is, at the time the cause of action accrues, within the age of minority or of unsound mind, the person, after the expiration of ten years from the time of the cause of action accrues, may bring the action within five years after the disability is removed.” When is the earliest that Mira can perfect title by adverse possession?
A. 2007
B. 2010
C. 2015
D. 2025
Ella owned Swampacre, a wild and undeveloped tract of wetlands spanning 1,500 acres, which she used for hunting wild ducks a few weeks each year with her son Fred. When Ella died, Fred assumed that he had inherited Swampacre, because Ella had always promised to leave it to him. But instead her valid will transferred Swampacre to a local church. Fred never read the will; nor did anyone tell him that the church owned Swampacre. For the next 10 years, no one visited Swampacre except for Fred, who hunted ducks on every part of the land during duck season for two weeks each year. Fred built three small “duck blinds” on the land; each one consisted of a wooden floor surrounded by reed-like camouflage to hide Fred from passing ducks. Fred’s hunting on the land was quite successful; each year, he was able to kill the maximum number of ducks allowed by law, though many of his shots missed their intended targets. Last week, a representative of the church visited Swampacre for the first time, saw Fred hunting there, and shouted: “Get off the church’s land!” The period for adverse possession in the jurisdiction is 10 years. Who owns Swampacre in most jurisdictions?
A. Church, because Fred’s possession was not adverse and hostile.
B. Church, because Fred’s possession was not continuous.
C. Church, because Fred’s possession was not open and notorious.
D. Fred, because the adverse possession elements are satisfied.
Tripp was walking along a trail on unowned land when he noticed a shiny object on the ground. He picked up the object, which turned out to be a lost Rolex watch. Noticing that the Rolex was not working, Tripp took it to a local jeweler to be repaired and explained to the jeweler that he found the lost watch while on his daily walk. The next day Tripp went to the jeweler to retrieve the watch. The jeweler refused to return the Rolex, simply saying “Hey, it isn’t your watch.” Tripp brings an action in replevin. Which statement is correct?
A. Tripp is the owner of the watch because he was first to find the lost item.
B. Tripp will be successful in his suit although he is not the owner of the item.
C. Tripp incorrectly sued in replevin. He should have sued in trover if he wanted the watch returned.
D. The jeweler has better possessory rights to the watch since Tripp was not the true owner and the watch is now in the jeweler’s possession.
Justin was a renowned movie star. Because Justin’s fame and high visibility made him and his home a common target of overzealous fans, Justin employed Brent as his private security guard. One day while making his daily security sweep around Justin’s estate, Brent found a small paper bag in the middle of a patch of tall grass. Brent picked up the bag and discovered a gold pendant inside. Both Brent and Justin now claim the pendant. Both have stipulated that the pendant was a lost item. Who has the better property right to the pendant, Brent or Justin?
A. Brent, because he found the pendant.
B. Brent, because the item was lost property, not mislaid property.
C. Justin, because the pendant was found on his property.
D. Justin, because Brent found the pendant in the course of his employment.
Jay owned an expensive gold pen. When Jay became seriously ill, he wrote a will leaving all his property to his wife, Gene. Jay then summoned Aya to his bedside and handed her his pen, saying: “Take this. I want you to have it to remember me by.” Aya took the pen and Jay died shortly thereafter. Who has the better claim to the pen?
A. Gene because Jay left all of his property to her.
B. Gene because Jay did not have a present intent to give the pen to Aya.
C. Aya because she has present possession of the pen.
D. Aya because Jay made a valid gift causa mortis.
In which of the following situations do you think a court is most likely to find that an owner of goods has abandoned ownership?
A. Suzie, a university student, had her backpack stolen while she was in the main library. In the backpack was a pearl necklace valued at $200. She reports the theft to the university police but takes no other measures to recover the necklace. Six years have passed since the theft.
B. Tommy owns a condominium in a beach community, which he rents out to vacationers. The condominium is fully furnished. Three years ago one of the guests took a copper kettle from the kitchen. Although Tommy visits the condominium on occasion to check its condition and make repairs, he has not noticed that the kettle is missing.
C. In March Ron, a college freshman, lends his DVD of the movie Inception to a classmate, asking her to return it to him by the end of the semester. She hasn’t returned the movie to Ron, and Ron hasn’t asked for it back. It’s now two years later, and they are still acquaintances at the same college.
D. Forty years ago, Isaiah, a newly wed husband, lost his wedding ring in the ocean surf while vacationing with his wife. Last week a person strolling along the beach found the ring and posted a description of the ring’s engraving on Facebook.
{"name":"Practice Property Midterm", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"Test your knowledge of property law with this engaging midterm quiz designed for students and enthusiasts alike. Navigate through various hypothetical scenarios related to property rights, adverse possession, and more.10 thought-provoking questionsMultiple choice formatChallenge your understanding of property law principles","img":"https:/images/course7.png"}
More Quizzes
LIA2005 LAND LAW I TUTORIAL QUIZ [Q8]
10549
CYCLE 2 LAND
1168
Indian Contract Law Quiz
52592
48-59 roman law
10590
English mindfuck
231225
MCQ TEST 3
10516
Legal Maxims-1
105110
Business Law Study Test
53260
Oblicon by Operario
11616
Indian Contract-Nature of Contract
105298
Torts Practice questions
29140
CYCLE 1 LAND
1589